Show newer

@0 lol Jeff owns the media they might write articles praising his company decision to cut off excess staff!

Void Abyss boosted
Void Abyss boosted

@adam
@Johncdvorak
This is massive by big pharma pushing for abortions by bogus prenatal tests!

:verified:  
CW Long post. Original content The deadly inaccuracy of many prenatal tests Prenatal tests are a vital part of the thriving eugenics industry wher...

@angelobottone Wow this is insane! Thank you posting this out, I came across your post totally random and my mind is blown out! I don't know what explains this total madness, I but i just curious what happens to aborted babies? I think there must a money incentive driving those evil health care staff to push parents to abort their baby, they must profit some how selling aborted babies stem cells or whatnot? I don't have proof of that so I am not sure.

Void Abyss boosted

CW Long post. Original content

The deadly inaccuracy of many prenatal tests

Prenatal tests are a vital part of the thriving eugenics industry whereby unborn children with genetic defects are not considered fit for life and are aborted instead. But a report in The New York Times (not a pro-life paper) confirms that the tests for certain foetal abnormalities are often unreliable as they give too many false positive results.

Even if advertised as highly accurate, for some conditions positive test results were incorrect more than 90pc of the time.

We highlighted the problem of the inaccuracy of foetal tests in a previous blog three years ago.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is used to screen the probability that chromosomal abnormalities, such as Down Syndrome, are present. These tests are now offered for more and more conditions. A positive screening test should be followed by a diagnostic test, to confirm the presence of the abnormal condition. Unfortunately, many do not wait for the follow-up test and abort their babies, not knowing that those screening tests are often wrong, as the New York Times article showed. With rare conditions, the probability of mistakes grows.

In Ireland we saw the tragic case of a baby who was aborted in Holles Street National Maternity Hospital at 19 weeks after his parents were incorrectly told that he suffered from Edwards Syndrome, a condition that is usually fatal.

But this is not a one-off case. It is likely that many healthy babies are aborted on the false presumption that they are disabled or will not live long after birth.

Ten of the 17 brochures given to parents by prenatal tests services and reviewed by the New York Times never mention that a false positive can occur and only one mentioned how often positive results are wrong.

The newspaper looked at five conditions, namely DiGeorge Syndrome, 1p36 Deletion, Cri-du-chat Syndrome, Wolf Hirschhorn Syndrome and Prader-Willie and Angelman Syndromes, and found the prenatal tests are wrong almost all the time (81pc, 89pc, 80pc, 86pc and 93pc respectively). This is appalling.

In 2019, the UK Advertising Standard Authority ruled that the ads promoting prenatal screening tests were misleading. For instance, out of 100 tests indicating the presence of Edwards Syndrome, only 37 were correct. Still, the tests were presented as 99pc accurate because if the condition is present, it is detected 99pc of the times. Accurate does not mean correct because often the test mistakenly says it is present. (For a more detailed account see here: ionainstitute.ie/the-inaccurat )
In simple words, those tests are oversensitive as they tend to err on the side of false positives.

Oversensitive NIPT would not be a problem in a society that does not kill those suffering of abnormal conditions. The tests should be used to prepare families and doctors to welcome the newborns and care for them according to their special needs. Moreover, decisions should be made once the diagnosis confirms the screening results.

But oversensitive tests are morally problematic in our society, where abortion is the default outcome of positive testing results. Many do not even wait for the follow-up diagnostic test.

In Ireland, there is no gestational time limit for abortions when the baby is not expected to live longer than 28 days and now campaigners want to extend this possibility also to non-fatal abnormalities. This would only increase the probability that healthy babies are aborted.

Even the most ardent pro-choice campaigners should want everyone told about the literally deadly inaccuracy of many of these tests.

Void Abyss boosted

[AGENDA 2030]

- The Great Reset
- Un gouvernement mondial
- Quatrième révolution industrielle
- Corporatocratie technocratique
- Dépendance totale au système de crédit social de l'État.
- Système de surveillance de l'empreinte carbone
- Revenu de base universel pour les citoyens conformes
- Monnaie numérique de banque centrale programmable
- Dépeuplement
- Vaccins obligatoires pour tous les âges
- Fertilité et reproduction contrôlées
- Lois radicales sur le suicide assisté et l'avortement
- Aliments et sols génétiquement modifiés à 100%
- Interdiction de tous les remèdes et traitements naturels
- Main-d'œuvre robotique
- Internet des objets et Internet des corps
- Micropuces et technologies d'interface cérébrale implantables
- Exposition constante aux CEM et RF non natifs (5G, 6G, 7G)
- Destruction des genres
- Destruction de la maternité et de la paternité
- Rationnement de l'énergie et de toutes les ressources naturelles
- Restrictions des voyages aériens "non essentiels"
- Villes intelligentes
- Drones, caméras de reconnaissance faciale, capteurs de mouvement
- Abolition de la propriété privée
- Contrôle et surveillance de la nature et de la faune
- Accès restreint à la nature sauvage (zones sans humains)
- "Développement durable" du Nouvel Ordre Mondial.

Void Abyss boosted

Allez !! Encore une plante qui guérit le petit Covid. Mais cela n'intéresse surtout personne. Un haut responsable du ministère de l'Union d'Ayush a révélé que parmi les 65 000 patients #covid là-bas qui ont été traités avec l'Ayurveda tout au long de la pandémie, pas un seul n'est mort !
naturalnews.com/2022-12-30-ayu

Is it going viral? Yes, "it" is going more "viral". (Mature audience only) 

@empiricism is still in its infancy as project I bet there are many ways to spam, troll and hack influential accounts.

The good thing about the right now is that it is still a niche/small community, many of the posts and comments you see are genuine it reminds me of the old internet before algos and targeted ads.

Void Abyss boosted
Void Abyss boosted

@empiricism @takvera

>As I've said a few times - only when climate change badly affects many wealthy people's lives - will they start to take it seriously (because they will have run out of choices not to)

Wealthy people feeling the effects of climate change is one thing making the right choices to tacle the problem is another.

The last two decades the hype was around **green** bio fuels (Bio diesel, Bio mass etc..) That turnout to be a more or less a scam.
For the next decade as example the hype is around **Green Hydrogen** hundred of billion of public and private money is pouring in this technology which will turn out to be a scam as well and set back the transition to renewable sustainable energy for another decade or more.

un.org/africarenewal/magazine/

blogs.worldbank.org/ppps/green

Mentions personality problems 

@empiricism @takvera

I didn't accuse any person attending the COP27 of hypocrisy, I don't know their intentions, motivations or conflict of interest.

But I sure want to point out that the should ban one time use plastics from their meetings, workshops and conferences, it a lot easier for them to do and they should lead by example, If they can't manage to do that, then that's a major hypocrisy!

Two minutes image search and here you go, climate change meeting with a table full of plastics!

undp.org/egypt/press-releases/

@takvera You seem like you attended al of this meetings, I hope you point out this hypocrisy for the next conference!

unctad.org/news/un-agencies-co

inb4 > It's just Egypt (third world) they don't know what they are doing.

Ok, so what's the point of these conferences if nothing is leaned from the previous ones?

(I am pretty sure there was a lot of one time use plastics in the previous conferences as well)

@empiricism

@empiricism @takvera it angers me to no end seeing some climate related meetings and there is one time use 8oz plastic water bottles which are basically plastic garbage and should be banned worldwide!

@Albert_Hubble
I know what you mean by "green fuels" I hope a decade from now you see a "Green Hydrogen" powered container ship, but I am as skeptical about It as you are about nuclear energy. 🙂

@empiricism
Thank you for your factual response, I agree with all the statements and arguments you presented and indeed in the long term renewable energy and a smart grid is the definitive solution.
My initial reply was a bit emotional since there are major cold storms going on in the start of this winter season and guilting people for using fossil fuel to heat their homes while in the short term there is no alternative seems to me counter productive.

Sorry if I switch subject this might need its own thread but you mentioned **greenwashing** and recently I had arguments regarding **Green hydrogen** which seems to me one of the biggest scams plaguing the climate movement, I am just curious about your opinion on it or if you have already written about it?

qoto.org/@voidabyss/1095803197

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.