@camwilson I think you can but maybe there's some confusion with regards to the different types of servers in their system.
@yogthos sure, except for all the stuff he said against Nazis in the KKK. Other than all that, though, yeah he's totally a sympathizer.
sigh...
@realTuckFrumper wow, it's authoritarian NOT to exercise authority to harm the population?
Maddow is really jumping the shark on this one.
@adwright I mean I'm sure he will troll again. He does it to get a reaction, you give him a reaction, so he's rewarded, and your reaction is encouraging him to do it again.
He's laughing at you.
@adwright It's the simpler explanation.
All these people saying Elon is not trolling end up rolling out these bizarre conspiracy theories... when It's so much simpler just to say maybe the troll is trolling?
@ricardoharvin I mean the entire US government was set up to be full of obstacles to any president enacting or enabling anything they choose.
This is at the core of the US government. And no, we don't give presidents an option to switch those protections off.
Trump got reelected because the Democratic party officials settled on obviously horrible candidates that handed the election over to him, as was entirely foreseen.
So we saw that the sky didn't fall when Trump was President before. It's not going to fall this time either. Why would it?
The entire system was constructed specifically to keep presidents hindered.
@maleve It's all about trade-offs.
For a lot of us the benefits of a gas range outweighs the decrease in air quality that it produces.
Life's all about weighing pros and cons of different options.
@DavidBHimself I'd even take this a step farther and say that such tagging is really required around here because it's the primary way this platform empowers users to craft their own experiences, whether for understandable reasons related to mental health or simply everyday usage of a platform that we're all trying to get more value out of.
It's just a good habit because it empowers each other, whether a topic might be fraught or not.
Folks, use those hashtags. Especially when the topic might be triggering, but also just in general, because every user of this platform gains from it.
@atomicpoet I think both protocols are valuable, if only to keep each other competitive and showcase different novel approaches to solving problems.
The thing that gets messy with Bluesky is in how things are quantified. There’s actually a decent amount of PDSes out there, but those aren’t the layer at which federation is necessarily happening. Data distribution and federation kind of trickle down from AppViews and Relays, which are prohibitively much more expensive to operate.
Bluesky has some really interesting architectural ideas, but whether or not it allows for decentralization in the manner that ActivityPub or Nostr do remains a matter of debate, and something of an open question.
@atomicpoet when you ask about potential it doesn't make sense to look at where it is today, though. Potential is pretty specifically about what could be, not what is.
I think the design of the AT protocol has a lot more flexibility and so a lot more potential. Development has been surprisingly slow, though, and a lot of people really don't understand it enough to think about developing it farther.
But that doesn't speak to the potential.
@scott for things like these I always emphasize moving the user experience logic to the user interface, including things like controlling which messages the user sees.
Don't control membership to the forum. Let anybody post whatever they want, but just don't show unwanted posts to the person following the forum, based on their own preferences for what they want to see.
Only want regulars or certain registered members contributions to show? Sure! But handle it in the UI so we don't have to go down the road of centralizing content controls.
@igb please no
@londubh so far we see people continuing to refuse to obey illegal commands, so the protections are still in place.
Most recently there was the refusal to recognize the ERA In official government documents. So long as the civil Service in particular is doing its job the protections are there.
@dianathy What? That wasn't a part of this case.
@mhjohnson The problem is those claims about the Chinese government control have been disputed in court.
It begs the question to assume that it's correct.
@dianathy No I'm going to say the DOJ didn't charge Biden because in the US system it works for Biden, so it would have caused a conflict of interest, effectively Biden charging himself. That's why DOJ does not prosecute sitting presidents.
Trump's side admitted that the evidence was not fabricated. Trump's team allowed the evidence into the record as genuine.
@drahardja sounds like you've been pretty misled about stuff that happened during Biden's term.
No, SCOTUS didn't decide that a president is immune from prosecution. Quite the opposite, the ruling specifically called for prosecution to continue as it sent the case to continue in the lower court. So much for immunity, it promoted prosecution!
But what the case did say was that Biden could not act like a fascist prosecuting people for invalid charges. The ruling was against Biden overstepping his power illegally.
When you get the facts of the Biden administration correct, it's a very different picture.
And he was rejected because he abused his powers in office. It's not that Biden should have used his power to stop Trump: it's that Biden did use his position in ways the public rejected setting the stage for a Trump comeback.
@adwright again I'm pointing out that your approach isn't going to convince people who aren't already on your side. It comes across as a nutty conspiracy theory, which I bring up to point out that a whole lot of nutty conspiracy theories are based on literal fact.
There are a whole lot of flat Earth conspiracy kooks out there who correctly point out that they're just stating fact, even though they're jumping from fact to weak conclusions.
All of this musk is a Nazi stuff can be counterproductive, taking the attention off of the guy and his misbehavior and instead putting the attention on the guy yelling Nazi.
@londubh No the US would challenge a hitler-like figure. The US itself was built with protections to guard itself from such a person.
We are not in uncharted territory here. We know exactly how the machine works to address these concerns.
We just have to learn about them and make sure we elect representatives who will put them to use.
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)