read about twitter aspiration to federate. BlueSky, pie in the sky? #xp
---
RT @neqone
As a big advocate of the #fediverse to get out of the walled gardens like Facebook, and ironically Twitter, I think it'd do a lot of good for them to be involved in ActivityPub (the W3C standardized lingua franca of the federated social media platforms).…
https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/12/21012553/twitter-bluesky-decentralized-…
https://twitter.com/neqone/status/1205483095635439619
@design_RG @neqone I hope they pick #Mastodon.
Would you want to federate with Twitter? #fediverse is alight with this.
Most say No way, José. Me included, stay away please.
I'm not sure I see any issue with federating with them. People can block the instance if they wish. But I have no moral objection to being able to hear or interact with a twitter user.
Two benefits I see with Twitter federating:
1) Easier for Tweeters to leave Twitter for another instance
2) Greater reach and engagement ability to and from politicians.
I agree with the need to document instances. What we need is a good database that looks at various moderation properties and listing if the instance has or does not have a specific moderation feature. This could be used for instances to define what instances they federate with or not as well.
The other points I dont agree with so much. The fediverse is just any server that provides the ActivityPub standard. I dont see it as a walled kingdom or even as a discrete entity. Just a way for servers to talk to eachother.