Show newer

@nergal @BradleySmall @malin I think I meant that multiple accounts on multiple services might already be established. It is always easier to start from a White room. A new broom sweeps clean. But no one wants to lose their investment in the existing system. If all my contacts are on Blurf.com and I think fluff.com is a better system, I either lose my friends if they don't come with or keep both

@peterdrake maybe that is slightly better than L. Ron Hovercraft .... Maybe :)

@nergal @BradleySmall @malin there is a benefit to keeping protocols closed. That way you own your users and can capture their data and sell it in one way or the other. People in general want convenience and not to have to think about the geeky side of technology. They want toasters. Nobody cares about protocols. They care about the things protocols do for them. It is not suicide, it is just technical laziness.

@ivesen okay, I'll give you that. But, not really my business anyway, you didn't ask for review. Occupational hazard. Forget I said anything.

@ivesen argc will be 1 to account for argv[0]. argv[argc] likewise should always be NULL or actually out of bounds depending on the compiler implementation since the last thing on the CMD line will be argv[argc-1]...

@ivesen you should check argc before dereferencing argv or you risk dereferencing NULL ...

@kezzbracey@linuxrocks.online I especially liked the way it allowed voiceover.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.