Thoughts on the Colorado Springs shooter
Excuse me, #nonbinary, not #bisexual:
If the #ColoradoSprings shooter is actually #nonbinary, that does not make them #liberal. It makes them a victim of #selfhate. #Liberalism does not make one self-hating, #Conservative bullying does that.
Thoughts on the Colorado Springs shooter
Excuse me, #nonbinary, not #bisexual:
If the #ColoradoSprings shooter is actually #nonbinary, that does not make them #liberal. It makes them a victim of #selfhate. #Liberalism does not make one self-hating, #Conservative bullying does that.
Thoughts on the Colorado Springs shooter
If the #ColoradoSprings shooter is actually #bisexual, that does not make them #liberal. It makes them a victim of #selfhate. #Liberalism does not make one self-hating, #Conservative bullying does that.
Most of the large accounts I follow on 🐦 have migrated to 🐘 . If I can just persuade a few more of the small ones to do #TwitterMigration, I can abandon #birdsite.
There is a well known phenomenon typically associated with the Right.
*Moral Panic*
It happens on the Left too, as we are seeing. Members of the community are primed to react in prescribed ways to certain triggers, and spread the #MoralPanic to others they are networked with.
And no one wants to be the first to stop clapping. #Moderators are operating out of either ignorance or fear.
The only problem with this, as with all things, is human nature. Like people in all positions of power, they will not admit when wrong. This is especially true in a situation like this. He caved to the few, based off of lies. To reverse that mistake would be admitting he is wrong and would open other decisions made in the past and future up to more scrutiny. In his mind, consciously or subconsciously, it would be better to ignore this. With this mentality its always easy to take action on an issue, but reversing the action nearly never happens.
Politicians, CEOs, and other people in power will make decisions to fix a problem, real or not, but when is the last time you have ever seen a person in this type of position REVERSE a decision. Almost never. I say almost because there might be an occasion I don't know about, but I can't think of any.
Reversing his action won't happen, because its an admission he made the wrong choice, and that takes courage.
As always, my opinion doesn't mean shit, and I hope I'm wrong.
a) We need to scale content moderation. A LOT. Corporate social network sites (SNS) do this by using armies of poorly paid, outsourced contractors. The #Fediverse should do it better. Perhaps by organizing a worker-owned content moderation cooperative?
Some quick notes on how we might build some of the essential infrastructure and governance processes that will be needed if #Mastodon is really going to be sustainable and viable as a mass-adoption social network (1/n):
RT @dburbach@twitter.com
He's not hiding it folks, and it's not just Elon flailing. There is a political agenda being pursued, not just GOP vs Dem but broadly including shutting down journalists and activists who might challenge the billionaires.
That and normalizing the alt-right
quality twitter cross-post
~
---
RT @lukeisamazing
Mastodon isn’t complicated, but if you’d till need help, here’s a quick explainer for navigating the site:
https://twitter.com/lukeisamazing/status/1594448434861604865
meta mastodon moderation / blocking
Wow - this is awesome. Now, I'm old enough to have been a moderator on Fidonet. And on IRC. Both the regular IRC and the one that ran as a backend to a huge social network (Sweden only) that was a bit like Facebook but long before Facebook. And some other things.
But the discussions on #fediblock regarding defederation are definitely bringing up a completely new aspect to network moderation I haven't really seen in this light before.
(1/n)
meta mastodon moderation / blocking
So, back to the original list. I think we're fine with instances blocking other instances because that specific instance has an opinion. It'll lead to a lot of user support (and I think muting should be the first option instead of defederation) but ok.
3 is stranger. When it's about specific accounts, block those - not instances.
And then we have 2 - defederating because other instances federate with those you block:
(4/n)
meta mastodon moderation / blocking
That's dangerous. It's a "you should do as I want you to otherwise I will punish you" action. It's authoritarian. It's the very opposite to the whole point of decentralization.
And the effect it will have is the full network type split - but not just between "alt-right" and "the rest" - but anything where two people can be of different opinions.
Which is everything.
And that will lead to the fediverse ending up as a few large _unconnected_ instances.
(5/5)
meta mastodon moderation / blocking
Disregard the headline, which I think is over the top. Pretend it's "Eugen caves to populist pressure" instead. I think the story of #qoto (which I didn't know of when I wrote the thread yesterday) is a very good example of a few of the things I brought up.
https://jeffreyfreeman.me/eugen-rochko-ceo-of-mastodon-found-to-support-nazis-agenda/
(I have no opinions on Qoto myself - I know nothing more than that it used to be listed, I have friends who signed up on it when moving from Twitter due to it's STEM focus)
Interested in #PlanetaryScience, #Exoplanets, #Astrochemistry, #Astrophysics, and #ClimateScience.
Sometimes send curated cross-posted content from my Twitter acct, #𓅪𐃘𓃰