Reminder: the seminal article about the source of the 464BC is this one:

Armijo et al. "A possible normal-fault rupture for the 464BC Sparta earthquake", Nature, 1991, doi.org/10.1038/351137a0

Show thread

Today's reading 👇, some historical papers, with the idea to enrich our teaching in the field next year about the Sparta 464BC

A new paper by IPGP and OVPF researchers A. Lavayssière and L. Retailleau:

Capturing ’s deep plumbing system and its spatiotemporal evolution with -

With a beautiful evaluation of location uncertainties

jvolcanica.org/ojs/index.php/v

Today, digging through archives, I found few old papers by Maurice Mattauer – my PhD supervizor looooooong time ago – Paul Tapponnier – with whom I worked for many years here at IPGP – François Proust – One of my teachers when I was an undergraduate – and Jean-Pierre Petit.

I extracted some figures for my blog.

They are about the High Atlas mountains and Tizi n'Test Fault, site of the Morocco 8 Sept and of the ensuing that claimed thousands of lives.

Have a look to my blog post:
tectoldies.mystrikingly.com/bl

That song 👇🏽 for awareness by Pashupati Sharma & Devi Gharti Magar with the words of Dr. Shiba Subedi from at School in 🙏🏽👏🏽❤️

Chorus says "Everyone learns how to prepare to survive an earthquake".

"Seismology at School in Nepal" program has been working to make people aware of earthquakes and their better preparation in Nepal.

youtu.be/ymE-lrAK0TI?feature=s

I try to post in French and English about the Turkish , here and also on the bird site (where I still reach much more people interested in natural hazards). Also responding to French media…

Not enough time to explain everything in detail though… 😕 Don't hesitate to ask, I'll try to answer whenever possible.

Thoughts for the many victims and injured in Turkey and Syria ❤️

Two faults of the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) system ruptured today. First, a Mw7.8 on EAF main strand probably breaking several segments. Second a Mw7.5 to 7.7 on the Sürgü-Çartak Fault (EAF N strand). Both ruptures are outlined by their aftershocks (circles on map), and both are left-lateral.

There are many aftershocks following the two big earthquakes, but the second rupture is rather a triggered earthquake on an adjacent fault belonging to the EAF system.

This reminds us to be wary of possible strong aftershocks or triggered ruptures in the following days-weeks after a big earthquake.

Strong destructive in SE Turkey / N Syria, magnitude Mw~7.8.

Mechanism compatible with left-lateral strike-slip on the southern part of East Anatolian Fault system. Aftershock zone extends for ~250km along that fault system. Complex source time function may suggest rupture on several fault branches. The left-lateral East Anatolian Fault system bounds the Anatolian tectonic microplate to the east.

Sources of maps:
• geoscope.ipgp.fr/index.php/en/
• emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earth
• koeri.boun.edu.tr/new/en

Magnitude Mw~7 north of ( island, Indonesia) in a complex tectonic setting where several micro-plates interact. Quite large discrepancy btw depth estimates (16-46km), complicated source time function. Mechanism is mainly strike-slip.

Source of maps and MT solutions:
emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earth
and
geoscope.ipgp.fr/index.php/fr/

I am totally astounded by what I read when I compare these two texts: Maria Graham's description of the coastal due to the 1822 , versus Charles Darwin's text on very similar phenomena related to the 1835 earthquake.

Read carefully, paying attention to the expressions used. It's like if borrowed Maria Graham's words, but also her interpretation about the accumulation of earthquakes raising the coast on the long term. 🤔
Any comment ?

Both 1822 and 1835 earthquakes happened in Central on the between Nazca and South America . Darwin's description, based on Fitz Roy (Beagle's captain) observations, is considered as seminal.

Thanks @haq for pointing me to the work by Maria Graham.

In my new post I follow up on the 1891 and the seminal article by Bunjiro Kotô published in 1893:

tectoldies.mystrikingly.com/bl

In this article, probably for the first time in the world, B. Kotô makes detailed descriptions of the earthquake surface rupture and offsets, and explicitly linked to faulting.

Kotô gave a beautiful 3D sketch 👇🏼 and an amazing narrative about mole-tracks (a now commonly used term for some specific surface ruptures): “Amongst the extraordinary things done by the earthquake, one that always drew attention was the earth-rent. It strikes across hills and paddy-fields alike, cutting up the soft earth into enormous clods and raising them above the surface. It resembles the pathway of a gigantic mole more than anything else.”

I just revived my blog, which was a little sleepy for a while, with a new post about the first ever described surface rupture (that of the 1891 Nobi Mw~7.5 earthquake in central Japan). 1/n

The 1891 fault rupture was indeed perfectly described and interpreted by Bunjiro Kotô in a 1893 article. It is admirably imaged by a B&W photograph in Kotô's article, and by this delicate anonymous watercolour painting 👇🏼, perhaps the first artist view of an active tectonic fault.

Read more: tectoldies.mystrikingly.com/bl

My Tectoldies blog is about “the beauty of tectonics – the art of geological sections & other tectonic sketches.” Feel free to explore and comment previous posts. I'll toot about some of them soon.

USGS got very similar mechanism, but puts hypocenter deeper (around 20km). This perhaps means that the rupture happened in the Gorda tectonic plate beneath the upper N American plate. The small Gorda plate is plunging under N America along the zone.

Show thread

Magnitude Mw6.4 in the region of the triple junction, at northern end of the San Andreas fault, . Mechanism is strike slip; rupture may have occurred on any of the ~N-S or ~E-W fault plane as it's a tectonically complicated area.

Mechanism Geoscope IPGP: geoscope.ipgp.fr/index.php/en/

In 1999 the North Anatolian Fault (NAF), Turkey, broke during two destructive east of Istanbul (Mw7.4 Izmit and Mw7.2 Düzce earthquakes respectively on 17 Aug and 12 Nov).

Today's Mw6.1 happened just east of Düzce with a faulting mechanism very similar to the 12 Nov 1999 event (strike-slip with small normal component). Its epicenter is located little to the north of the main NAF fault trace.

Map with MT and source function from geoscope.ipgp.fr/index.php/fr/

Other map shows in red the fault broken by the two 1999 events (purple and red stars locate epicenters, yellow circles show aftershocks). From C ̧akir et al. GJI 2003 doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.20.

Magnitude Mw 7 offshore island in archipelagos. Small waves in Honiara on other side of the island.

There, at the San Christobal trench, the Australian plate is subducting beneath the Solomon arc.

Moment tensor solution ("beach ball" on the map) implies rupture either on a vertical fault or a nearly horizontal one. More data and models will be needed to understand if the earthquake happened on the subduction megathrust or within the downgoing plate.

MT and source function from geoscope.ipgp.fr/index.php/en/
Sea level graph from webcritech.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Se

Today's in W Java has a strike-slip mechanism according to moment tensor solution by BMKG, Indonesian Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysical Agency - inatews.bmkg.go.id/

See map 👇🏼 with the "beach ball" showing the fault mechanism with two possible very steep fault planes.

Hypocenter shallow depth ~11km and closeness to Cianjur town (less than 10km), where damages are reported, likely explains its destructive character. Strong shaking also reported in Jakarta at ~80km from the epicenter.

According to posts on twitter, there are significant damages and at least 2 fatalities after a moderate magnitude M5.6 in western Java island, Indonesia. Inland shallow fault rupture, close to towns, likely explain the destructions.

RT 👇🏼 twitter.com/BNPB_Indonesia/sta
and
twitter.com/pamumpuni/status/1

A magnitude Mw6.9 offshore south-central .

Mechanism and location suggest rupture on the shallow part of the close to the trench (on the very shallow dipping fault plane). However, modelled depth of ~19km, if true, seems little too deep given the closeness with the trench (USGS gives same depth and mechanism). This means that we cannot exclude a rupture on the steep fault plane within the oceanic plate.

Map with source time function from Geoscope IPGP
geoscope.ipgp.fr/index.php/en/
Larger map with epicenter of this event in red from USGS (both not yet on fediverse it seems)

I'm senior researcher at (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) and (Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris).
ipgp.fr/~lacassin

Working on , and sometimes processes, related and risks, science communication…

I'm executive editor at TEKTONIKA twitter.com/WeAreTektonika (a DOA journal not yet on Mastodon), and advocate of , free

Just moving from Twitter to Mastodon, and learning how to use it. Will keep the two accounts alive, at least for some time…

Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.