Show newer

Two faults of the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) system ruptured today. First, a Mw7.8 on EAF main strand probably breaking several segments. Second a Mw7.5 to 7.7 on the Sürgü-Çartak Fault (EAF N strand). Both ruptures are outlined by their aftershocks (circles on map), and both are left-lateral.

There are many aftershocks following the two big earthquakes, but the second rupture is rather a triggered earthquake on an adjacent fault belonging to the EAF system.

This reminds us to be wary of possible strong aftershocks or triggered ruptures in the following days-weeks after a big earthquake.

@coldhotman Sorry. No time to answer now. Too many journalists…

Strong destructive in SE Turkey / N Syria, magnitude Mw~7.8.

Mechanism compatible with left-lateral strike-slip on the southern part of East Anatolian Fault system. Aftershock zone extends for ~250km along that fault system. Complex source time function may suggest rupture on several fault branches. The left-lateral East Anatolian Fault system bounds the Anatolian tectonic microplate to the east.

Sources of maps:
• geoscope.ipgp.fr/index.php/en/
• emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earth
• koeri.boun.edu.tr/new/en

South-central is burning. Reminds the January 2017 catastrophic that killed at least 11. Very high temperature and drought conditions (T°max 33-35°C in Santiago past days). Imagery Aqua/MODIS.

“Según el reporte de Conaf, hay 191 incendios forestales activos a nivel nacional: 45 en combate y 146 controlados, situación que va variando permanentemente por las condiciones climáticas”

Read more here (in spanish):
elmostrador.cl/noticias/multim
And:
elmostrador.cl/revista-jengibr

“A study, conducted in 2020 by the American Physical Society (APS) and published in Physics Today, reveals alarming rates of unethical research practices and harassment in the physics community, including data manipulation and physical abuse.” 👇🏼

nature.com/articles/d41586-023

In The Guardian: Science journals ban listing of as co-author on papers. Some publishers also banning use of bot in preparation of submissions but others see its adoption as inevitable…

theguardian.com/science/2023/j

Open letter to the
to support Rose Abramoff @ultracricket
and Peter Kalmus @ClimateHuman

"We as scientists cannot and must not tolerate this censorship and chilling lack of support from our scientific society and therefore urge AGU to, etc…"

Read and sign here aguopenletter.com/

The prompt and the text written by -3:

Prompt: Write a text explaining: why the discovery of the West Andean Thrust is important; why the fact that the Andes primarily formed by west directed faulting changes our understanding of orogeny linked to subduction; what is the role of the San Ramon Fault in these processes and the implications on earthquake hazard.

Answer:

The discovery of the West Andean Thrust is important because it provides evidence that the Andes primarily formed by west directed faulting. This changes our understanding of orogeny linked to subduction, as it shows that the Andes were not created solely through east-directed thrusting from subduction zones. Instead, this west-directed faulting has been found to be a major contributor to the formation and uplift of the Andes.

The San Ramon Fault plays an important role in these processes, as it is one of the main faults responsible for west-directed faulting in the region. It is believed that this fault was active during periods of mountain building, which allowed for increased uplift and deformation in the region. Furthermore, its activity has implications on earthquake hazard in the area, as earthquakes originating from this fault can cause significant damage due to its proximity to populated areas.

Overall, the discovery of the West Andean Thrust and its associated west-directed faulting contributes greatly to our understanding of orogeny linked to subduction and provides insight into how mountains form. The San Ramon Fault also plays an important role in these processes and has implications on earthquake hazard in nearby areas.

Show thread

I asked -3 to write something about the in the .

Well written, but verbose and without much meaning. It basically repeats the prompt's ideas introducing some new details. However it's not enough to say that something is important, you have to explain why. A student giving such an answer will get a bad mark.

I'm not surprised as there is no intention, no understanding by the AI. But such a text can impress / convince a naive person on the subject, and even perhaps even some decision-makers and managers of science.

@Anthro

Shortly:
1/ DOA journals like Tektonika, Seismica, Volcanica, are hosted by Universities -> server infrastructure, DOI, etc…

2/ all tasks are voluntary: maintaining the system, editors, reviewers, copy-editing and production, communication. Meaning that we need strong implication of the community (and will need more !)

3/ About the peer review process at Tektonika, read: tektonika.online/index.php/hom

4/ Also useful readings: tektonika.online/index.php/hom and tektonika.online/index.php/hom

Today, #TEKTONIKA #DOAJ has published its first paper ! 🎉

20th to 21st Century Relative Sea and Land Level Changes in Northern #California - by J. Patton @earthjay et al.

tektonika.online/index.php/hom

Toot it, share it, read it FREE !

#openscience #openaccess #tectonics #eustasy #SeaLevel

... the AFP also shows an early global temperature reconstruction for the Holocene from 2013, which has since been shown to have a spatial bias. The state-of-the-art annual global mean reconstruction is Osman et al. 2021 and looks like this. nature.com/articles/s41586-021

Show thread

Imagine it is 2023 and one still needs to fact-check absurd old climate denial memes because they are spreading again with many millions of social media views, even though they have been refuted many times before. Thanks AFP. However... 1/2 factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.

Speaking in Davos, the UN secretary general, António Guterres, accused big oil companies of peddling 'the big lie', calling for them to be held accountable.

“Today fossil fuel producers and their enablers are still racing to expand production knowing full well that this business model is inconsistent with human survival”

theguardian.com/global/video/2

Magnitude Mw~7 north of ( island, Indonesia) in a complex tectonic setting where several micro-plates interact. Quite large discrepancy btw depth estimates (16-46km), complicated source time function. Mechanism is mainly strike-slip.

Source of maps and MT solutions:
emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earth
and
geoscope.ipgp.fr/index.php/fr/

When #ClimateScientists say they are concerned about the severity of #ClimateEmergency, this should be treated as scientific evidence and not as opinion.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.