Show newer
Shamar boosted

@xj9 @walruslifestyle@octodon.social

Did I say that existing isn't perfect?

But imagine if it was public domain!

@xj9 @walruslifestyle@octodon.social

That's what they want you to think.

But afaik didn't do a clean room implementation of , for example.

Also suggesting to not share ideas means suggesting to not do anything innovative or subversive, since once you distribute something innovative you ARE sharing ideas.

isn't perfect but makes it harder to run EEE tactics.

But throwing subversive code to the public domain is just a way to do R&D for big corps for free.

@walruslifestyle@octodon.social

That would be the joy of American corporations.

No authorship, no copyleft.

The shortest path to see your subversive project embraced, extended and extinguished.

Shamar boosted
Shamar boosted

Do others feel that the *vast* majority of the exciting open source work these days happens outside the U.S.? (In a larger proportion than you'd expect based on where commercial software is written, I mean).

At first, I thought it was just that #rust had a non-US tilt due to Mozilla's involvement.

But the more I look around, the more it seems like (almost) all the exciting Foss projects are in Europe – with the notable exception of sr.ht/ and a few others.

Agree? Disagree?

Shamar boosted

@ljwrites

While this is the smartest objection to my usual comparison of free software and free speech, I think you are missing an important detail.

is a work-aroud to defeat unjust laws.

If I take code (or executables, it doesn't change much), modify it and publicily share the result under any form, I'm going to be criminalised and actually indicted for copyright infridgement.

Now for a , programming is a form of expression just like writing is for everybody else.

International copyright laws and agreements is basically statal censorship for economical (thus ideological and political) gain.

Now, one might argue that are a tiny minority that do not deserve such right to expression and it have to sacrify it for the other mainstream programmers.

And it's surely true that the people did their best to take Free Software from hackers to turn it into an exploitative, ethically washed, tool.

And I agree that, because of that, we are reaching the limits of what a licence, however strong, can protect.

For example, thanks to the progress of , we can all see that all free software copyleft forgot the right (duty?) to .

But free software still stands as a tool to create a protected zone of free programming expression in a hostil environment ruled by (corporate friendly) copyright law.

Since copyright infrigement can lead hackers to statal jail, free software IS free speech.

Shamar boosted

@strypey

I have been a very active member of the .

I can say that not even one single time moderators behaved like that.

On the contrary, the used their role to impose their own personal opinions, even banning people who disagreed.

I for one was banned for 2 weeks for arguing that the shouldn't use or except to drag people outside, since (back then) the party bragged about . "You don't have the moral flexibility to be a politician" they said back then.

The people who wrote the text you've found are gone long ago.

Shamar boosted

For those contemplating the Librem 5 #smartphone by @purism, hold your breath competition is about to start. See volla.online

Shamar boosted
>americans posting "all countries matter" as a counter to 4th of july
imagine being so immersed in your burger-centric worldview that you don't think every country has holidays to celebrate their history and identity. all counties matter but we don't need western piggu to validate it, that's the point of having things like this.
Shamar boosted

#GAFAM

Facebook: "oops I did it again !"

Facebook admits to improperly giving user data to third-party developers, again

mashable.com/article/facebook-

Hi @fdroidorg@mastodon.technology I've read aboit and it looks quite easy to setup, but I wonder: what's the bare minimum for serving a repository to ?

I mean: most of fdroid server cope with apk building, but we could build them on a machine and serve them from a less powerful one..

Shamar boosted

In a pure functional language, all constructs can be expressed as anonymous functions ("lambda functions"). I wrote an article "Everything is a function" that explains how this works.

wimvanderbauwhede.github.io/ar

#haskell

Shamar boosted

E' stato pubblicato il rapporto sullo stato del Web Decentralizzato dopo una serie di interviste a ben oltre 650 sviluppatori del "DWeb"

Si parla di valori, sfide tecnologiche e protocolli futuri. Sembra che questo sia il primo rapporto sull'ecosistema del Web Decentralizzato in assoluto.

Speriamo che troverete il rapporto così esaustivo e perspicace come ci è parso a noi:

medium.com/fluence-network/dec

#fediverso #dweb #webdecentralizzato

@quinta @alciregi @prolocwt @naciketas @nilocram @maupao

Shamar boosted

Olimex is a manufacturer of open source hardware and components, follow their new account here:

@olimex

Their website is at olimex.com

Amongst other projects, they make the Pioneer FreedomBox home server running software by @freedomboxfndn : olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/

They also make an interesting DIY laptop: olimex.com/Products/DIY-Laptop

#Olimex #OSHW #OpenSourceHardware #FreedomBox #SelfHosting

Shamar boosted

@ljwrites

While this is the smartest objection to my usual comparison of free software and free speech, I think you are missing an important detail.

is a work-aroud to defeat unjust laws.

If I take code (or executables, it doesn't change much), modify it and publicily share the result under any form, I'm going to be criminalised and actually indicted for copyright infridgement.

Now for a , programming is a form of expression just like writing is for everybody else.

International copyright laws and agreements is basically statal censorship for economical (thus ideological and political) gain.

Now, one might argue that are a tiny minority that do not deserve such right to expression and it have to sacrify it for the other mainstream programmers.

And it's surely true that the people did their best to take Free Software from hackers to turn it into an exploitative, ethically washed, tool.

And I agree that, because of that, we are reaching the limits of what a licence, however strong, can protect.

For example, thanks to the progress of , we can all see that all free software copyleft forgot the right (duty?) to .

But free software still stands as a tool to create a protected zone of free programming expression in a hostil environment ruled by (corporate friendly) copyright law.

Since copyright infrigement can lead hackers to statal jail, free software IS free speech.

@wim_v12e@octodon.social

Well... actually lambda calculus AND bb encoding. But I'm quite familiar with lambda calculus and I see that BB encoding can enhance what you can do with it.

@alice

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.