Hexnut @ambihelical@qoto.org

@uncomfyhalomacro Emacs. I have 149 use-package configurations. Of those 35 just customize built-in packages. So probably about 114 "plugins".

@debacle @Sdowney @uncomfyhalomacro

This seems oddly restrictive. Why would you do that?

@mph You will still get multiple matches per file, it's just not grouped. I haven't actually been able to use `-- -l` and get any results at all. Not sure if that's a bug or not.

@mph
You can turn off the grouping via a configuration.

`(consult-customize consult-ripgrep :group nil)`

If you wrap consult-ripgrep or any consult command for that matter with your own command, you can do the above with your new command instead and the group setting should be applied to just it instead of consult-ripgrep.

I do this for my wrapper around consult-notes-search-in-all-notes, a function provided by consult-notes package, which you might want to check out, lets you search multiple directories.

@freemo @illandan

Hmm, I WAS talking about danger, specifically the threat of violence. The quote didn't really specify what caused that fear, so I didn't think it was true in this case.

I agree that some things that might get you scared aren't a reason to restrict someone else's freedom, but there are things that can get you scared that should. So the original quote just isn't true in all cases, It sounds good but it shaves a few too many corners.

It seems freedom from the threat of violence is included as a natural right (did some research), which makes sense to me. I you saying you don't think that is a natural right?

@matt

You CAN kind of wing it, if you are in charge of the API, e.g:

<code>
let handle = create_window(WindowConfig {
width: 500,
z_position: 2,
autoclose: AutoclosePolicy::Enable,
..Default::default()
});
</code>

From: https://www.thecodedmessage.com/posts/default-params/

@freemo Aren't you violating my natural right to freewill and choice by coercing me to run via the fear of potential violence? This seems analogous to fraud, where the violation of one's rights isn't as obvious and getting e.g. bludgeoned. But it's still a violation.

@freemo I dunno causing someone intentional fear is not a protected right. There are specific laws against that kind of abuse.

@peterdrake I guess you mean reflection? Yeah, they do that. I had one attack my car's right (and only the right!) side car mirror almost continuously, had to cover it up for a week just to prevent damage, little guy forgot about it after that.

@brokenix no-littering package + (no-littering-theme-backups) to avoid the problem altogether

@Floyd Well, well, well.... What do we have here?

@harish Hmmm, I guess I don't understand why you care really. I sometimes run rings around other engineers, but it's not because of keybindings. Sometimes its about emacs functionality independent of keybindings. Usually it's other stuff though, not related to emacs. Whether or not I may be using the most efficient editing method isn't really relevant. It's like optimizing a function that only executes 1% of the time. Doubling it's speed isn't worth the time working on it.

@harish I use evil because I spent multiple decades using vi/vile/vim bindings. My fingers know it too well. I'd probably be happier with the original emacs keybindings, at least in emacs, it's less impedance mismatch with the keybindings of various modes, but it's the path I took to emacs, so I have continued with it. I think a lot of other people are are in the same boat, it's not so much that it's superior or not, but it's easier to get on with it.

@benwis it’s defined convention by POSIX so standard on Unix like os.

@AstraKernel Why not do these as a poll? B seems right, but I'll probably forget about this question...

@noodlejs probably just the hashtag but the one at the top really is cut off. Using iPhone 15.8 safari on my raggedy old 6s.

@noodlejs cool idea. I can’t tell though is it cutting the tags off on the left in this result?

@freemo Do you have a name for the company yet?