*banned 4 MarkDown love* @design_RG@qoto.org

Ah shit they figured out the scam!!

Emmabuntüs sur un Pentium 4 à 3Ghz ! C'est Faisable !

Merci à notre ami Clément Lallain pour son bel article sur la mise en œuvre de l'Emmabuntüs Debian Edition 2 sur un Pentium 4 de 2003 ❤️♻️🐧💻👍

https://blog.lc-numerik.fr/accueil/emmabuntus-sur-un-pentium-4-a-3ghz--c-est-faisable-

Quoi ? Je me chauffe

@toast @mdszy @ashfurrow @bclindner @pganssle

For myself, banning/blocking an entire instance simply because they refuse to take control away from their users and refuse to practice censorship is abhorrent to the very idea of the fediverse. If one really wants the platform making such decisions for their users and wants to be on a platform where users have no choice/voice, then shouldn’t one be over on the birdsite and let them ‘protect’ people from wrongthink?

Alternatively, we could just let users decide for themselves what they do and don’t like. Will this allow some ‘bad’ stuff to get through from time to time? Sure, of course. Is that worth it? To me, yes. I guess it just depends on whether one is actually for freedom and openness or one is just playing lip-service to such concepts and really only want freedom and openness for the Right Sort of People

Just discovered, from a Bing search for a book (which they have, in their library).

Web design is pretty hard to read on my laptop, but can be zoomed out for larger text.

The Information Database at the CyberPunk Project

http://project.cyberpunk.ru/idb/

And see their Library also at :

http://project.cyberpunk.ru/lib/

@Full_marx an instance owner can set any rules they want and block or ban whoever they want from a technical aspect. The owners also get to decide if they wish to block their entire instance from other entire instances, again technically speaking.

Usually when a user selects an instance they do so with the intention of picking an instance that has rules and moderation policies they personally agree with. Obviously people who join an instance want to know that they will not personally be censored but also protected from others who might harass them or otherwise be unwelcome.

On this instance, QOTO, we do **not** ban people for being right-wing, left-wing, or for holding any particular viewpoints provided they are respectful and curteous to others.

We require users to basically be kind to eachother, the most fundemental rule is to "respect a users right to disengage" In short this means if you make it clear you do not wish to interact with someone they are then obligated to leave you alone, if they dont then action will be taken.

Statements made intending to be explicitly hateful, such as explicitly racist comments, would also be against the rules (as i said, be kind to one another). But again we won't ban based on political views or personal opinions though.

According to a theory this is how our solar system

#Wishlist for 2020 ?
@design_RG

I would like to see what this screenshot shows:

A post with RICH text formatting, here in Geoff's post a Quoted block, but GlitchSoc does support full MarkDown tags in Toots text.

Things like Bold, Italicized, Underlined text . Underlined links if desired - and more.

Web Clients that, like Pinafore already (see screenshot) support displaying this RICH formatting. Yes, Pinafore is awesome, thank you Nolan!
Pinafore's homepage is : https://pinafore.social
GlitchSoc is advanced, cutting edge Mastodon development. See it at : https://glitch-soc.github.io/docs/
or in person at an instance near you.
Screenshot below shows Geoff's post at Hackers Town -- https://hackers.town , which runs GlitchSoc.

But, wait - won't this BREAK in other Mastodon instances? Display UGLY formatting marks in line with the text? Nope.

See in a minute a screen shot of This post (pretty, here in GlitchSoc) as shown (Plain Jane) in a normal Masto instance. (kind of a let down, but no damage done)