Show newer

@Mor696 @chairgirlhands re. GQP – I thought you were just completely ignorant, TBH.

OK so you're calling someone "fascist" because they're on the other side of a quibble about what age a certain book is appropriate for. Got it. 👍

@Mor696 @chairgirlhands This is no better than twitter in that respect, sorry to say. You and I both got blocked by OP here it seems, due to our replies being something other than enthusiastic agreement and lament. That's how it is quite often on instances like mastodon.social.

@Mor696 @chairgirlhands

"Nazis were very far left." I'm fine with abandoning the left/right thing, but it's probably not useful to say this; you just aren't meaning the same thing by "left" that anyone else means, so no communication is possible. And they weren't really socialist; they talked about socialist economic policy because it was kinda popular at the time, but never really implemented it to any great extent, IIUC. But even if they did, that isn't the thing anyone cares about with respect to them.

It's not "GQP".

"they are the current Fascist party." Don't be silly. US fascist parties include ANP, the unfortunately-named NSPA, etc. They're disbanded, though, I believe.

@Pat @Acer also, OP is incorrect. Legitimate gifts are also taxable in some cases.

@chairgirlhands @Mor696 I know what she *means*, of course. (She's quite clear, and probably doesn't need you to reword everything she says.)

@Mor696

Nina's bio says: anti-capitalist, anarcho-syndicalist. I'll translate for you: that's lefty. Profile pic is a film portrayal of Soviet hero Lyudmila Pavlichenko, you get the idea. (Don't get me wrong, huge fan of the Soviets in the Eastern Front, they literally saved the world.)

These "libs" she's complaining about are not radical enough, you see – they support some of what she says, but she imagines they'd try to get her to stop tilting at the Nazi windmills that she sees all around if she were to start getting violent.

@AnarchoNinaWrites Heh I admit I was wrong about him winning, I'll give you that.

@sentient_water @skry Yeah, that's probably the best thing for us to focus on: if content creators find that more and more people get their content from places other than crap-platforms, then crap-platforms will lose their status.

e.g. Doctorow: he publishes on his own site, fediverse, twitter, tumblr, wherever. I read him here. If I ever set up RSS again I'll probably just get it straight from his site's feed. The more people that do that instead of twitter, the more twitter withers away.

@Java Now with Marquis de Lafayette you'd have a point.

day 6

A Little Wordy #6 🎨✅ 97% theoatmeal.com/wordy?date=04-2

thanks a lot for not making me type the whole thing, @oatmeal !

Show thread

@Java meh, who cares. Cleopatra VII may indeed have had similar skin tone to this actress. Unlikely, probably, but who cares.

Yeah, it's a little weird when Denzel Washington is supposed to be Keanu Reeves' brother, or Cynthia Addai-Robinson is Trystan Gravelle's cousin (and in that show all the hobbits should probably be about the ~same skin tone for obvious reasons), but little mermaid? Who cares?

Let some actors act and get over it.

@LouisIngenthron @georgetakei It's usually pretty easy to find news coverage for posts that sound totally ridiculous like this, and 99% of the time you'll easily find some context that makes it far less ridiculous than OP is letting on. nbcmiami.com/news/local/action

To be clear: I disagree with the outcome here, and in my opinion the shooter's action should probably be sanctioned in some way.

But OP's framing is BS, cheap, deceptive poltical rhetoric, and you were discerning enough to realize.

@georgetakei An interesting thing about microblogging is that it allows you to make misleading posts like this to score cheap rhetorical points with no real blowback to your credibility.

In better fora, people would stop putting up with this nonsense pretty quick.

@LouisIngenthron @georgetakei You are very wise, sir.

In this case, the narrative, like much of Takei's narratives, is full of shit.

The drivers ran over the shooter. I'm not saying I would have still concluded the shooter is off the hook, but this at least sort of changes things a little, at least, yes?

@AliceMarshall Streisand effect; now everyone knows about the tip line. We'll see how this plays out.

@skry @sentient_water You are likely overstating the credibility hit :) (This place sort of self-selects for that, I realize.)

"show character" is kind of what I was getting at. It would be great if we could en-masse move everyone to a platform that was run reasonably. (This is one reason I'm here instead – protocols not platforms.) But we can't. Any journalist who does is likely just throwing a good chunk of their career/influence/etc away for infinitesimal practical benefit to the world. Is that really the hill you want journalists to choose? Think the journalists you'd consider most likely to do what you're asking for here: do you want them silenced for such little gain? I sure wouldn't.

<skip overwrought Nazi analogy>

@AdrianRiskin @clairep @chadloder Tl;dr – someone has a quibble with substack's moderation policies.

@clairep @chadloder It's not, of course; despite all this noise. Not Masnick's finest analysis. Check it out: has it become a "Nazi bar"?

@freemo

I don't know; maybe?

See these when you're logged out:
mastodon.online/explore
freeatlantis.com/explore
It says "These posts from this and other servers in the decentralized network are gaining traction on this server right now."

That's what I mean.

qoto.org/explore
It's sort of a directory of users. Nice, but totally different.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.