@namark just be careful with those because pointers are often invalidated
@namark sure, I think we are running out of names for non-owning containers. reference_range is good I guess, or observer_range if that makes sense with observer_ptr
@namark range or range_view
@namark I think they're called surd types
@namark what about algebraic numbers that can only be stored with bounded precision (like radicals or continued fractions) in floating point & fixed point numbers? Aren't the "pure-algebra" representations of a radical or continued fractions better (no truncation) & deffer roots & divisions respectively?
@namark Compiles with clang trunk & msvc
@icedquinn which show lol
@freemo it ultimately depends on context but I'd rather be more specific and use "chart" or "plot" instead of graph for the meaning of a non-mathematical graph
@arxiv_cs bruh moment. Most doublethink conclusion I've ever seen
@why based
views are my own