🇳🇱
@design_RG @mngrif @arteteco Seems I'm going to reluctantly have to vote to silence neckbeard, pl, and FSE.
Giving safe harbor to individuals who evade bans and complete inaction regarding resolving it is too big a risk to the safety of our users. If they can no longer block users they wish to block they have no protection against harassment. Since this individual threatened to murder someone it is particularly concerning.
As was seen I reached out to the admin of all three instances and after a long talk none were willing to take action to ban or contain the user in any way.
For these reasons I reluctantly need to vote for a silence.
Any votes from the rest of you or discussion left?
Well no, that doesn't fall under free speech by definition or by law.
@freemo @quaylessed @arteteco @design_RG @mngrif
You're correct and the better word is censorship
Yea I think it is valid to call blocking someone, even when justified, censoring them.
Despite your very articulate point I'm pretty sure you use a spam filter on your email. That too is censorship.
