I dunno thats kind of a dumb take that missed the point of the riots, not that I agree with or justify the riots, but it wasnt over just any white man killing a black man, it was about a police officer slowly, intentionally, and methodically killing someone in broad daylight, chocking them even long after they passed out and refusing paramedics and others to treat him... It is far from an every day murder.
His response and take on it strikes me as not too bright or aware of the situation.
1) i do agree that he doesnt follow the majority with that statement.. but im not sure thats praise worthy in this case.
2) it doesnt matter in the least if it was the knee or the drugs.. the point is he continued to strangled him even after he was dead, so his **intent** is clear regardless of if he might have survived extended strangulation if sober.
@freemo @Atlas_Khan @10grans @Coyote and all of the other riots? Or are the Floyd riots the only ones that made it on your radar?
Plenty are on my radar. But since Tyson was talking about the floyd riots thats the one I'm responding to.
For most its about race, I think that is short sighted. To me it is about police brutality and over reach, and it is a very real issue.
wild political exposition rant
@Atlas_Khan the whole game of 202X liberalism is about framing their position with optics so they can shame anyone who disagrees with it. that’s it. and they learned from 2010s and 2000s neoliberals this tactic works very well (people will do anything if you tell them its for their kids —hitler)
this is why i now say beware anyone who is trying to sound reasonable because it may very well be a consent trap.
for example the reason the forefathers wrote down keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is they literally already sat through generations of government disarming the populace through bullshit and even in our countries lifetime they tried to find loopholes to disarm black people etc.
frame the argument in such a way that disagreeing has poor optics and then run shame games on them for bad decorum or bad taste etc.
i mean.. read up on sales tactics. it always starts with “getting to yes.”
re: wild political exposition rant
re: wild political exposition rant
There is no shortage of hardcore libertarians who go to idiotic extremes.
@Atlas_Khan @icedquinn @10grans @PestToast @freemo @Coyote Those aren't marketers booing. Those are the Autistic Masses booing.
They are also the shameful Leftist anti racists claiming Libertarian principles now
@Atlas_Khan @icedquinn @10grans @PestToast @freemo @Coyote
But one real retard
Counter counter point.. As a strong libertarian myself I am ashamed of the majority of libertarians.. they take it too far to the point of anarchy rather than just localized government.
See the following youtube video of the actual libertarian primaries where Greg Johnson (who won thankfully) debated with the other top choices.. Everyone but Greg Johnson is entierly cringe worthy here.
I am a strong libertarian in terms of my ideas, but I dont like most of the high ups in the party itself. Thankfully the one who tends to win the primaries is often more moderate and worthy of supporting.
@icedquinn @10grans @Atlas_Khan @PestToast @freemo @Coyote Sorry, what is the full name of your Religion?
Ethereum is actually a bit better in the short term as they have a head start and ADA doesnt have the ecosystem ETH has just yet.. but ADA is intentionally moving slow so they can do it right rather than fast. They are planning many of the same features as ETH but with none of the issues and lock-in to those issues ETH currently has. ETH is the best only because no one else is really doing smart contracts (a few are but not seriously).. but ETH is a mess both in terms of the language that governs smart contracts and under the hood.
ETH fixed and improved on BTC and will take them over, and ADA is fixing and improving on ETH and will likewise take them over long run.
I dont take it as an argument.
So few things.. its proof-of-stake from the onset which allowed them to design a more efficient proof of stake system than one hacked on top of proof of work. So this means lower fees and faster transactions.
It also has tokens as a core idea rather than an after-thought, meaning they work the same as the core crypto unlike with ethereum (you have to wrap ethereum in a token which is costly), so much less gas cost there too.
In fact youll find MOST of what makes it better is they arent trying to fix things after, which is hard because they have to maintain backwards compability so many things can be fixed. Ada however planned all this out from he beginning and is trying to do it right the first time. So you dont have these sort of problems where earlier versions stop you from fixing later design changes to work well and efficient.
In the end Ada will scale far better than ETH, be faster, and the language youw rite smart contracts in will, I am sure, look much cleaner and be better to work in from an aesthetic perspective too.
1) What's an account worth having to trade, is crypto.com decent? I think I had coinbase once, and binance... Those are options I have open, but not sure they are good ones.
2) Yea, what's a safe bet, k, Ethereum, I can believe that, I'll look up Cardano. Just got like $20 worth of dogecoin (at like 30 cents, I'm sure I'll probably loose that but for overnight curiosity factor, maybe). Like I said though, it's kinda money that's "being risked" and I know that, which is why it's a tiny amount, but then again, more reason to not worry as much about risk at the moment?
Thanks :-)
@10grans tip 0.001 to @freemo