IMPROVE PEOPLE _NOT JUST TECH_ @freeschool@qoto.org

Free Anonymous image upload and hosting via Lutim (free as in free beer)

https://img.adminforge.de/

@framasky

⬆️ A developer of it is also on Mastodon! ... Frama style!

Lutim is also the software name as in "free speech".

Double bind "prevents the person from either resolving the underlying dilemma or opting out of the situation."

"...confusion makes them difficult, both to respond to and to resist"

Double bind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bind

We need protecting *from* #Police #Officers

- The Government's Police Officers 👮 not ours ❌

We are funding 🔫 these things and it needs to stop being funded ⛔ 💰 🤑

Video Example: https://invidious.jing.rocks/watch?v=nH8OQFZ2b-I&t=53m36s

You can't trust anyone working for money, because they must find money (to save themself or family, even at any cost to humanity).

Individuals willing to sacrifice or come out of those loops might find another way, if they can avoiding new holes to dig themselves.

You can't trust anyone working because they 'need' money (both boss and worker)... because the they don't want or try to come out of slavery or the hole.

#MinimumWage #Slavery #Poverty #Hole ...keep working...?

Work on something else at the same time, even a bit?

More work for constantly unsatisfied uncaring people (?) is opposite to progress or not the right progress.

They are ungrateful and will even expect more after your extra work after a new 'normal' is set.

Effectively raising the bar on yourself like pushing pushing heavier weights as new normal.

Human change first because technology almost ONLY gets forced towards profit without that.

If it's public and people need money, then you can hardly trust anyone who are working for money (willingly or not... loving money or not- they must find money at any cost to humanity)

But all things _might_ be needed to try even if it plays into the same bad hands first...

Open-source and 'open' stuff is also turned towards evil on larger scale. Good or or bad - all leads to profit first unless really it's defence is built in. And one defence is more clever AND loving people (we have clever people but not loving).

Imagine all the people trying for good and the bad just take the cream of that only first for advertising tricks and forcing another kind of governance.

Again your stuff on blockchain _might_ be needed, if allowed... if people want it, want more tech and blockchain in their life... etc etc... if... while real power is existing over weak people just working endlessly...

@amiya_rbehera Human change first because technology almost ONLY gets forced towards profit without that.
If it's public and people need money, thenyou can hardly trust anyone who are working for money (willingly or not... loving money or not- they must find money at any cost to humanity)

But all things _might_ be needed to try even if it plays into the same bad hands first...

Open-source and 'open' stuff is also turned towards evil on larger scale. Good or or bad - all leads to profit first unless really it's defence is built in. And one defence is more clever AND loving people (we have clever people but not loving).

Imagine all the people trying for good and the bad just take the cream of that only first for advertising tricks and forcing another kind of governance.

Again your stuff on blockchain _might_ be needed, if allowed... if people want it, want more tech and blockchain in their life... etc etc... if... while real power is existing over weak people just working endlessly...

21@amiya_rbehera@mas.to
Growing people first it seems better for many contexts;

Growing B- can get rains I think better than - this scores in the now more than later or as technical challenge with uncertain / perhaps near-0 use. Growing people first it seems better in many contexts;

OH WELL _shrug_ .... "NEEEEXT!..."

@amiya_rbehera You write too short... Good you can reply but...
🔴 ... you distract from many points you could answer
🔴 ...you didn't answer almost any of the questions

🏁 Congrats... we're done! 🏁
To keep working this way is a mistake.

There rest is not needed, I think the above is enough...

So you think logic works with workplace type people or sharks or with work/money logic, and even general people views.

51% is often a stupid mechanism too as 1% either way means it was even so half unhappy is bad.
Another way is needed to not make not that much unhappy.
(Eeven 60/40 is still close and bad / need to work together)

Anyway I'm wasting my time..

I like you're writing in theory only but without many answers back sorry it doesn't work at all.
All these things could... work... like always so many good things around. Why are they not used?

I guess it's tempting to keep developing... good luck without answering people's questions.
_shrug_ .... "NEXT!..."

1/ #Trust Building with genuine #Anonymous / #PsuedoNames

2/# Feedback #Vouched #System
#p2p #Users #ProofofWork #People and #Mutuality in #Timelines etc

While it's good to do some questioning and inquiry, reading of the last few posts to judge someone, looking at their avatar etc... you can't expect to understand everything connected in a short and in a non-deep way... That would lead us only to a newer Twitter ;)

So yes allow a bit of strange or weird (which is actually often the "new" or unique) sometimes / often.

No one person trusting anyone or using the job title as a kind of filter is also meanwhile not useful because it's not building trust properly by yourself ( by your not practising it or being too protective online without Capitalistic labels )...

You have people that don't answer some people based on avatar which is being too sensitive while they might put their name and address everywhere somehow trusting everyone else in the world!!...
(not going to name who but it's quite hypocritical because online is a lot safer as any real risk and more people are just scared of a user online without educating themselves).

Trust-as-you-go is also possible and means things are totally blind or totally "anon" (take a deep breath!). Even if I say I am this or that as #anon / #noname / #activists / #archivist then still by what I say and do online, what I and other boost and have done with others IS tangible -

You can feel free to question that if you cannot just work positively forward as 'best we can' and with constant clarity as main parity check along the way publicly as safety somewhat and privately...

MY FURTHER IDEAS & THOUGHTS AS #PEER CHECK #PEER2PEER AUTHENTICATION (somewhat)

One or more people can make tangible trust between those others that have already talked to / experiences with and can prove for others they are ok or at basical communicable level

And even dox them or their actions if really really really needed. It's like more community eyes on us where pointing fingers also is a judge on you (rather than silent judgement people don't see and is your error in withholding / not giving trust / Ubuntu but in negative form).

Most people don't want to do do bad or have reasons we need to sort anyway... even #jokers #shitposters or #shitpost genre in general are amazingly honest and obvious flavours and still truthful to themselves at least so not bad at that level either - actually very clever too usually and diverse in creation and even truth. Honest in that (even clear racists) are helpful to see online and serves them too with outlet usually without violence if it does then we need to know about it too which trusting more does)

We accept somewhat distrust but as part of building from where we're at can use all people willing and accept filtering and even openly justifying why...

#AI #Quotes from post: https://mastodon.social/@publictorsten/113315998059621041

💬 "the mistake is using the tool in the first place." #Quote
- jelte @jelte

💬 "There is no identifiable person to hold accountable here." #Quote
- Jon Het. @Jon_Kramer