LucifarGundam @lucifargundam@qoto.org

@sofia
This assumes they do.

@lucasvl

It's a social stigma thing.

Breast = sex
Utter = food

Breast milk = aphrodisiac
Cow(goat, etc) milk = food

@LouisIngenthron

One time I was combing through business listings on gmaps and came across someone's private practice that they didn't want listed on Google. They were initially mad at me for calling them until I explained how I got their #.

@Dennis5891 @WintaireJae
Legally, you're allowed to argue.

But doing so in this case would probably put you on some Fed's list.

A block list.

Not me though ;)

@Dennis5891 @WintaireJae
A site designed and ran by Feds. Best place to go to become friends with Feds.

@WintaireJae

Hey now, I post every day!

#3goodthings
-still employed
-had some drinks
-had good food

interesting....

@Lost_World

this screams #blacksabbath

@iska@mk.starnix.network
I don't support proprietary onomatopoeias

@Stellar
Ew

@tripu @anthropoid@101010.pl
Although I am well-cultured, I am not subject to cancel-culture. Furthermore, unless given functional, reasonable cause- I do not change my ways unless presented with more-efficient options. The accuracy of my maps and graphs will reign true through the most harrowing storms.

That being said, although such groups have my sympathies- I do not relent without meaningful dialogue about the entire circumstance. From beginning, end, and theoretical fourth-wall.

In this context, if such groups established civil, functional communication with affected organizations- there would be the grounds to be potential change of whatever sort. But simply saying 'dont use my name in your name' means nothing unless originator have a relatively meaningful establishment to uphold. If Apache tribes started their own IT company or were trademarking Apache, then there might be some merit to it- even if it were in sympathetic retrograde. In the meantime, it's just name-squatting and it's just hindering any potential positive affect that could be attributed to it.

@tripu @anthropoid@101010.pl
Although I am well-cultured, I am not subject to cancel-culture. Furthermore, unless given functional, reasonable cause- I do not change my ways unless presented with more-efficient options. The accuracy of my maps and graphs will reign true through the most harrowing storms.

That being said, although such groups have my sympathies- I do not relent without meaningful dialogue about the entire circumstance. From beginning, end, and theoretical fourth-wall.

In this context, if such groups established civil, functional communication with affected organizations- there would be the grounds to be potential change of whatever sort. But simply saying 'dont use my name in your name' means nothing unless originator have a relatively meaningful establishment to uphold. If Apache tribes started their own IT company or were trademarking Apache, then there might be some merit to it- even if it were in sympathetic retrograde. In the meantime, it's just name-squatting and it's just hindering any potential positive affect that could be attributed to it.

@geoffrich

Didn't Einstein borrow the saying 'A teacher who does not know how to explain things in simple ways, does not fully know the subject matter themselves "?

@icedquinn
Ding dongs that don't dong the ding thing? Good thing you have a ring a ding to get a ping.

@shibao

You are never secure.

Unless you're with me. Then I got you.