Daniel Dvorkin @medigoth@qoto.org

Golly. That's a shame.

https://www.kivitv.com/news/idaho-student-loses-off-campus-housing-for-displaying-a-trump-flag

They have such Mondays to show you.

The affinity between #primates and #canines goes way back.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27675-monkeys-cosy-alliance-with-wolves-looks-like-domestication/

The same people who have been whining that The Democrats Aren't Doing Anything are now whining when ... #Democrats do something.

"Corey [sic] #Booker's filibuster was performative nonsense."

"we knew it was BS when #Schumer was gushing about it lol"

Well, those were two easy blocks.

I've become so jaded by the steady decline of the #Jurassic * franchise that I'm skeptical about ever again seeing any good #dinosaur #movie that isn't a documentary. But hope springs eternal, so I'll give it a shot. "This ain't no walk in the park" is at least a clever and pointed tag line.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfMKBKKzIXM

Republicans hate you and want you to die.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/01/trump-health-agency-layoffs-cuts

"#Putin's smarter than everyone in the #Musk administration put together. And I don't even think he's that smart."

I'm rather proud of this one.

(I (have (to (admit (I (never (expected (to (see (#LISP (#viruses (but (I (suppose (it (was (inevitable.)))))))))))))))))

https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/29/malware_obscure_languages/

"What's the penalty for being late?"

"Death."

"What's the penalty for rebellion against the Emperor?"

"Death."

"Guess what ... we're *late*."

Treat innocent people like criminals, and they will see little reason to stay innocent. This is so obvious it shouldn't even need to be said. And yet.

Sometimes I wish I believed in Hell so I could think #antivaxers would burn there.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/29/top-us-vaccine-official-resigns-over-rfk-jrs-misinformation-and-lies-dr-peter-marks

I have in fact read the #MIS (#medication #information sheet) for the #Pfizer #vaccine, since that's the one I've been getting, and I do the same for every prescribed #medication I take. People act like it's some kind of super-secret information, when really it's as easily accessible as a Mike #Waltz chat on #Signal.

Over the years, a lot of people have asked me if services like #23andMe were legitimate and safe. I always said yes, citing the rapidly improving technology and strict #genetic #data #protection laws.

I was wrong, and I’m sorry.

#Bhattacharya for #NIH, #Makary for #FDA, the latter with some (D) votes. Fuuuuuck.

"Daniel Dvorkin f'ers like you will probably live in the chambers of hell"

"Well aren't you just a little ray of sunshine."

So ... how's your day going?

[coding] "Huh, that's a weird result. I need to fix that."

[Cate Blanchett voiceover] "Then something happened the Daniel did not intend."

*Every single time*, man.

@vansice @GottaLaff DUI hire!

@woozle @GottaLaff That's what I keep hoping. People this incompetent can't stay in power forever ... can they?

"Peer review is the worst method of safeguarding scientific integrity, except for all those other methods that have been tried from time to time." As Churchill might have said if he'd been a scientist rather than a politician.

From a conversation with a friend: https://theconversation.com/peer-review-is-meant-to-prevent-scientific-misconduct-but-it-has-its-own-problems-248015

There are a lot of flaws in #peerreview as it's generally done now, and people working to improve it. But what's the alternative to the concept itself? We know what general public #commentary on #science looks like, and politicians shoehorning science into their #ideologies, and science for #profit without checks on validity ... they're all awful.

None of them can be completely avoided either, any more than the potent combination of authoritarianism and stupidity which is always trying to infect #democratic forms of #government. (Just to choose a random example.) And in fact there *should* be input into science from outside the field, because it doesn't exist in a vacuum any more than defense or education or business or religion or any other large-scale area of human endeavour.

But if there's a better way to keep science more or less on track, I'll be damned if I know what it is. The only people qualified to judge the work of scientists—not the big-picture priorities, and not the utility of the results, but the nitty-gritty of the work itself—are other people knowledgeable in the same line of work, and I don't see that changing. Same as any other job, really.

Like I said above, there are proposals for addressing peer review's flaws, and I'll be happy to expound on that if anyone likes.

Use as needed.