MZan @mzan@qoto.org

@raito

ah, I'm happy you answered according personal experience! I feared it was more wishful thinking, than personal experience 🙂

I have too much hobbies/IT-interests, and so it is more easy for me seeing non optimal support of some environments.

But I still use it, because after you configure it, it is incredible manageable, and I like it very much.

And it is improving.

@nobodyinperson

@nobodyinperson
eh, ideally yes, but I believe that nowadays too much tools have some form of built-in package-managing i.e. emacs packages, vscode plugins, Firefox extensions, etc...

Every tool has its rules, and sometime they are in potential conflict with the NixOS way.

Hopefully in future, there will be a common interfaces/API for controlling the packages of different environments, and then NixOS will interact also with these.

Without some help, I think that the NixOS-way can never reach the perfection, because it is hard (sometime) to imitate perfectly some complex environment.

@raito

@codinghorror in 1989 he said

> These days you see more men and women suing each other. It's a very insidious thing.

Nowadays, instead, you see more women suing other men for facts happened in the 1989. 😕

@freemo this is tootese instead 🙂

Frrrr.... fru fruuu @freemo, I'm tootalking to you 🙂

@freemo according this page https://edition.cnn.com/2020/02/03/health/baby-talk-boosts-infant-brain-wellness/index.html

I figure out that I speak to child in parentese and not in proper baby-talk. At maximum I can intersperse parentese with some "ahhh", "ohhh", "ehhh", but these are exclamations, not baby-talk.

It seems that parentese is better for children. Obviously with slow cadence, and simplified grammar.

@freemo it is a never ending discussion, if done on Mastodon. You should search in bibliography what experts are saying. Or you can follow the scientific approach: take two children and two adults, acting in two completely different ways, and observe the way the children react.

I agree that an extreme condescending interaction is not optimal, but I bet that children are rather good in perceiving fake emotions. If you enjoy the play and interaction, then the child will smile and he will start playing. Probably the ultimate judge is the child, not me or you 🙂

@freemo without a video as example, it is difficult to judge when the "baby talk" is a fair communication, or when it is a form of "aggression" towards the poor baby. Like my grandmother pretending always "give me a kiss, give me a kiss". 🙂

@freemo you should ask to experts, not to us.

IMHO, you had to create a connection, utilizing multiple channels of communication. It is a mix of body and spoken language. You become partially a Charlie Chaplin. You are not only speaking, but also acting and partially singing. It's also a turn-based game: you say something, and you wait for a reaction. Usually, you imitate a little the answer of the child, but in more adult way, and the child step by step, try to imitate the adult way. It is usually a step by step imitation process.

@freemo ehm sorry, bad English on my side. I mean "only for being sure to be on the same page"

@freemo .. only for sake of security. In Eiffel you can declare new expanden/value types (i.e. an RGB color, a 3D Point and so on), while in old versions of Java you cannot declare new primitive types. Soon, you can do the same also in Java.

@freemo yes, there are two levels.

At the semantic/logical level, a type can be a value or a reference.

At the implementation level, if the value-object is big, you can store a reference to a shared dictionary of already instantiated immutable-objects. In OOP, this pattern is called Flyweight.

As funny side-note, in Common Lisp, the implementation level can use both an expanden value or a reference. In CL an integer is always an arbitrary long integer. You cannot have an integer overflow. If the integer is "small", then it will be a normal number ending with a 0 (or 1 depending from the implementation) in the last binary digits. If it is a long number, it will be allocated in RAM, and there will be a reference to it.

@freemo Eiffel language manages immutable types in a rather good way. They are called "expanded" in the Eiffel jargon, but you can think to them as "value" instead of "references/entities". So, you have no references to them, but only explicit values. The classic example is an INTEGER NUMBER, or a BOOLEAN or a POINT. You cannot change 5 in 10. 5 is a value.

@freemo ... bro, for the same reasons they invented bra :-)

@rodlux @amoroso Mandrake CD-ROMs were sold as a gadget of various Italian magazines. It was gorgeous. At the time, KDE was winning the battle against GNOME.

A distro similar to Mandrake, from a philosophical point of view, is Linux Mint.

@pimeys @publicvoit ... additionally I have this in the config

```
# off-line deduplication
services.beesd.filesystems = {
root = {
spec = "LABEL=nixos";
hashTableSizeMB = 512;
verbosity = "crit";
extraOptions = [ "--loadavg-target" "2.0" ];
};
};

# Btrfs maintanance
# Without this, the free space is not reclaimed after many deletions.
systemd.services.balanceBtrfsRoot = (balanceBtrfs "/" "daily");

```

@gothnbass@linuxrocks.online yes, Common Lisp is also a running system. You can interact with data, update the code, etc... Like when you interact with a DBMS.

@mobiuscog the problem of #nixos, if used for development, is that every programming language, IDE, editor, browser and so on has its built-in package manager, and this can conflict with the NixOS way.

I like also OpenSUSE Leap + distrobox, but I'm still using NixOS, because it is a lot easier for configuring services.

@Fighen @Elikorokoros @Mau_or_

in realtà è il contrario. La convenzione di Instanbul dà alle vittime di stupro un vantaggio in sede di processo

"In tema di violenza sessuale, la testimonianza della persona offesa vittima di siffatto reato, ove ritenuta intrinsecamente attendibile, costituisce una vera e propria fonte di prova, purché la relativa valutazione sia sorretta da un'adeguata motivazione, che dia conto dei criteri adottati e dei risultati acquisiti."

quindi se portato al limite, è l'accusato che deve dimostrare di essere innocente e non l'accusatrice a dover dimostrare di aver subito un danno, dato che la sua parola vale come prova.

Ovviamente, per evitare di condannare innocenti solo sulla base di una falsa accusa, l'accusato e gli inquirenti hanno facoltà di testare l'attendibilità dell'accusatrice. Da qui la sensazione che gli "stiano facendo il processo contro".