@timorl wat?
veganism, crime, lifehack, misinformation
@bonifartius
* veganism = (hurting animals = bad)
* giving resources to people doing bad things = bad
* taking resources from people doing bad things = good
* stealing = taking resources
* veganism = (stealing from people hurting animals = good)
Infallible logic.
@timorl you still create demand with it by consuming the product, you steal from only the last part of the chain.
@timorl @bonifartius you are going to single handedly steal a substantial portion the shop's stock and then do what with it? That wouldn't be stealing that would be destroying. Vandalism! Otherwise if the majority if people who can make use of the product are in on your plan, you don't have to steal either, just don't get in at all.
But don't fret my cultured robber fiend, there may be use for your skill in this important struggle - instead of freeing it up, clog the chain! Steal from people who buy it and sell it back to the shop for half the price, make sure it stays on the shelves until it expires. Shops will love you and the production will halt.
@namark @bonifartius It doesn't have to be a significant portion to have an effect, with the usual vegan approach of not buying things your effect is probably of a similar order of magnitude.
Although funnily enough this points to another serious reason why usual veganism has chances of working while this approach doesn't – usual veganism is relatively easy for people to adopt as a moral framework, creating the potential for a decentralized shift in values in society, while steling-for-animals is unlikely to be widely accepted.
I think your idea has about the same chances of working as mine, but it's a moot point anyway. Unfortunetely I'm not actually a proficient robber. :<