Here's a hint: If you do not agree with a premise, you do not accept it.
Do you agree or disagree? Choose one, they are mutually exclusive.
@Eris learn english? @AR-15 @bonifartius
@AR-15 I don't care to be nice yo you, I'm sorry again if I heart your feelings, you can block me or mute me or whatever
Argue your point. Stop arguing about whether or not you're arguing. This is just silly.
@AR-15 If you want to see my argument it's in my reply to OP, and in my first reply to Eris. Past that it's Eris pretending that I'm arguing something I'm not arguing.
What is it that you are arguing then? Because you seem to think we're retarded and you clearly don't like us. I'm begging you, please say "my point is: ___." Stop doing this meta abstraction bullshit. It just makes you sound like you're hoping you'll make yourself sound smart (you're not) and confuse us into saying you were right, and it sounds like you're doubling down because you really don't want to have an actual argument, you just want to jelq your midwit IQ.
@AR-15 Here is a direct quotr from my reply to OP
> People lost close friends and family to this pandemic and
the thorn in all of your sides, that will torment you till the end of days... not let me blow your minds... simply remove it (the exactly text I pasted here) from my reply... the point still stands... if you can't see it all I can tell you is "learn to read", I'm sorry again for hurting your feelings
"Here is a vague allusion to what my point is and a condescending comment about how you are insufficiently smart to read my mind, rather than just a clear unambiguous statement of my position"
Stop doing this.
@Eris I wrote it down... do you want me to copy paste it here or something?
>do you want me to copy paste it here or something?
I want you to type a single sentence that clearly tells me what the fuck you are trying to say.
@Eris I did it in my first reply, and now also clarified that the thing you are so hung up on, is so inconsequential to it that you can literally remove it, can you do a basic edit, and re read it? Or will you keep playing dumb forever?
@AR-15 @bonifartius
> Or will you keep playing dumb forever?
Here's an idea: Assume I'm not playing, and just actually answer the questions I ask you
@Eris I answered all question you asked me to the best of my ability, I can't help that you refuse to read.
>I answered all question you asked me to the best of my ability,
I asked "Was there a pandemic, yes or no?" Four separate times and I still don't know your answer.
@Eris for the purposes of my conversation with you I said no since the very beginning. Now if you are asking me as the all knowing god, the barer of truth to bestow upon you the salvation you seek... wrong number...
@Eris I'm telling you that in the context of the OP it is irrelevant, and I'm not here to satisfy your curiosity. You may have already inferred my disposition, that will suffice.
@AR-15 @bonifartius
>in the context of the OP it is irrelevant,
I have no clue what this means.
>and I'm not here to satisfy your curiosity.
When you join a discussion, you are here to satisfy the curiosity of others in the discussion. Tell us what you think so we can discuss it.
Otherwise why are you talking at all?
@Eris I replyied to OP to talk about the OP with the OPer. I reply to you to talk to you about how you can't read.
@AR-15 @bonifartius
@AR-15 what are you even talking about? I reply to whomever I wish, whoever I wish as I have clarified here.
> I reply to whomever I wish, whoever I wish as I have clarified here.
Why do you not wish to reply reasonably to me?
@Eris my replies are very reasonable, you just can't read them, some sort of mental block @AR-15 @bonifartius
>did it hurt or did it not hurt? If I do it I do it unintentionally, that's why I apologize. I though you guys are thick skinned.
Condescending snark is not being reasonable.
@Eris look up the definitions of the words snark, condescending and reason...
It's really bizarre for someone to be so overtly snarky and then actually try to deny it.
@Eris I'm not denying I'm snarky. I'm saying it's not contradictory to reason. I must repeat, you really truly can't read anything I write do you?
@AR-15 @bonifartius
>I'm not denying I'm snarky
>look up the definitions of the words snark, condescending and reason...
The obvious implication of this snarky reply is that you are denying being snarky.
@Eris no you claimed I'm not reasonable because I'm snarky. I asked you to look up the definition, so that you at least realize that it is possible to be both snarky and reasonable and not at all to deny that I'm snarky.
> so that you at least realize that it is possible to be both snarky and reasonable
They are in fact mutually exclusive, and in this particular instance your snark is a method for avoiding being reasonable. It's your way of deflecting.
@Eris nice job not looking up the meanings of the words...
@Eris here I looked up the definition of snark for you
>an attitude or expression of mocking irreverence and sarcasm.
If you are honestly claiming that it is impossible to speak mockingly while also expressing reason, the I don't know if any examples can convince you. One would be when I say that you can't read, you obviously can read, I jest, what I'm expressing is that you are missing my point.
>If you are honestly claiming that it is impossible to speak mockingly while also expressing reason
Not only am I claiming that, I am shocked that you find that to be a claim at all.
>the I don't know if any examples can convince you.
Try one and find out.
@Eris I just did? How much more proof do you need of your inability to read?
> I just did?
You did it again. You just say you did it, without ever doing it.
> One would be when I say that you can't read, you obviously can read, I jest, what I'm expressing is that you are missing my point.
one would be, as in one example would be, just read
> Yes, exactly. Stop doing that.
I will not, and that has nothing to do with reason.
> You never say what the point is though.
The original point in my reply to OP, that you reuse to address even though I keep pointing it out.
>I will not, and that has nothing to do with reason.
"I will not be reasonable with you" is being unreasonable.
>The original point in my reply to OP, that you reuse to address even though I keep pointing it out.
Yes, what is that?
>you obviously can read, I jest,
Yes, exactly. Stop doing that.
What point am I missing?
>what I'm expressing is that you are missing my point.
You never say what the point is though.