Paul Ganssle @pganssle@qoto.org

Looks like they are temporarily out of stock: https://earthy.com/products/fresh-pawpaws-from-earthy-delights

PSA: It is currently pawpaw season. I found out about these things a few months ago and ordered some from Earthy Delights, and they are delicious!

I’m really sad that they are only available for a few weeks each year.

How about a chart of fraction of people with X complication after Y period of time? How are millions of people getting this surgery without being able to make a realistic assessment of their risks?

I “love” how every website I find about LASIK complications says something like, “20-40% of people experience dry eyes, which usually peaks around 3 months and disappears within 6-12 months, except for a small number of people who have it forever.”

How small is that number‽

Has anyone got a list of questions I can ask a potential fitness trainer to ascertain whether or not they are likely to be in one of the more science-based fitness camps?

Every time I try to read a book on fitness, it’s all, “The one simple trick to get ripped abs with zero effort!” I want a fitness coach with a pragmatic, skeptical point of view.

So, basically this permanent sign is advertising that all the sushi comes with math homework?

Ooh, nifty:

Saving memory with Pandas 1.3’s new string dtype
https://pythonspeed.com/articles/pandas-string-dtype-memory/

Bryan Caplan makes a very compelling point that if you think first-hand accounts are not credible, you should find the news even less credible: https://www.econlib.org/first-hand-experience-is-less-biased-than-news/

I think the second two points are doing most of the work there.

I tend to agree with his assessment, but I think he’s discounting (or missing) several things working in the other direction:

1. Institutional and reputational forces. If news consumers care about truth or if the culture among journalists is to value truth, news organizations have incentives to work against these biases.

2. “Reliable” is ill-defined here. If most people’s threat model is “someone might lie to me, have been deceived or be wrong”, in theory news organizations may be more trustworthy - they are much more likely to simply be wrong than to lie, and they can and often do hire fact checkers to follow up more deeply into a story than any random person would.

3. People may be aware that “shows up frequently in the news” is only weakly correlated with “happens a lot”, and may already strongly discount this factor. Reading an accurate account of a very unlikely thing is not really wrong, and it’s unclear how it compares to a dubious account of a relatively common thing in terms of pragmatic value.

For anyone who missed the reply chain, I figured this out: https://qoto.org/@pganssle/106794915957856274

Anyone have an idea what I’m doing wrong here?

https://gist.github.com/pganssle/31a899ea34d2ecff77034b25e077b600

I can’t seem to get a minimal docker-compose configuration to expose nginx outside of the container.

(Note, replace _ with / in the file names of the gist).

Do you have a website for your family? Any interest in sharing it with me?

Looking to set something up, and I’d be interested in seeing other examples of the genre.