It’s clearly statistics with p-value:
1:1 => p=0.3173105188
2:1 => p=0.0455001240
3:1 => p=0.0026999344
4:1 => p=0.0000633721
5:1 => p=0.0000005742
But the problem is elsewhere. In experimental social science “effect size” and “sampling error” are artifacts of method, when data rarely meet the assumptions.
Triangulation is IMHO better idea than efforts to lower p-values: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-01023-3
There is plenty of alternative OS. And plenty of Android distribution too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_custom_Android_distributions
Non-profit journals as a solution to open science?
Publishers charge researchers incredible amounts to remove paywalls from their own papers...and make unbelievable profits from doing so. Several have an >30% profit margin.
Initiatives such as @PeerCommunityIn provide an alternative: open access, non-profit journals that are free to publish in.
#OpenScience #Science #AcademicChatter @academicchatter
Graph (2013): @alexh https://alexholcombe.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/scholarly-publishers-and-their-high-profits/
1) there should be some robust system for identifying and archiving articles (in case of a blog-site shutdown, or similar);
2) In my opinion, the peer-review system is ineffective and biased, however, I think that without it, process would be much more (status) biased and vulnerable to fraud, corruption, conflict of interests and so on.
👉 Do you want to become a better researcher?
👉 Do you feel insecure about making your work more open?
Sign up to join us for a month full of
✅ reflections on your career,
✅ discussions about the way we practice science, and
✅ practical steps towards #OpenScience
12 emails 💌 over the course of a month that are designed to help you on your Open Science journey.
I’m disgusted with the manipulation of the authors of this graph.
They are comparing the mean to the median, of, even not every worker, but some part of them, “traditional blue collars”
which decrease since 70’…
More than half of this “disconnection” is clearly a lie, the second part is about growing inequality. Which is catastrophically bad, but we do not have to lie to show or prove that.
#PsychologicalScience (the journal) after the replication crisis.
A z-curve analysis
The % of significant (p < .05, z > 2) results has not changed much (ODR = 75% vs. 71). However, the actual power to get these results has increased a lot (EDR = 21% vs. 68%). As a result, the false discovery risk has decreased from 20% to 2%.
Look out for the 2023 replicability rankings coming soon.
In addition, it paid €87.5m for #subscriptions in 2020 and predicts it could pay €97.5m in 2030.
@BorisBarbour @david_colquhoun of course conclusions will be similar, but not the same, and this is one case. It will be almost impossible to explain if you don't know what methodological falsificationism or severe testing is. Reading my textbook would teach you about these things - this is a good starting point. https://lakens.github.io/statistical_inferences/questions.html?q=Methodological#three-statistical-philosophies
Dear #Americans of #Mastodon, you have a wonderful opportunity that is rarely granted to you. For the first time, you're in an online public space that is not American, that is not centered around the US, and as I'm typing this, a place where the majority of users are not Americans. You can open yourselves to the world as you've rarely been able to before.
So please, stop expressing yourselves like the US is the default country here and that most users are Americans. We're not. Love.
antisemitism, fediverse, rant
A Jewish politician comes onto the fediverse- and what is he welcomed with?
A comment about how he doesn't deserve to be boosted.
A comment about Israel despite him not mentioning Israel.
This is why Jews don't feel safe on the general Fediverse folks. This right here.
It's why I felt so compelled that I made an instance for Jews where this isn't allowed.
QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.