@whitequark try using different constants to suicide by; this is a special case of since mine and this approach usually requires a small correction afterwards (to the tube of conditionally adding one or something like that).
Or am I misreading and this is more witchy?
@infotroph @afeinman @aredridel
What incentivizes judges to pretend to believe them?
@infotroph @afeinman @aredridel
What incentivizes judges to pretend to believe them?
I would understand this as saying "there are legitimate configurations which cause curl to reveal the password to a third party". If such a configuration exists, the third party can trivially get the password next time a request that triggers the bug is made.
Is there a separate field there for "likelihood of prerequisites"? (e.g. if we had a hypothetical vulnerability that gave RCE to anyone on the network but only if the timezone of the victim was set to Antarctic, how should that be assessed?)
Negativity, bad news, powerlessness, dystopia, bad emotions
> I don't enjoy action movies/books and fantasy anymore - because it's usually about preserving rotten status quo.
You might wish to know that the Steerswoman series (if you squint, fantasy; if you squint a few chapter in in a different way, fpvrapr svpgvba) is very much not about preserving status quo.
(But be warned that it's an unfinished series, though there's IMO a good chance of it being eventually finished.)
@_thegeoff Uh, isn't the cap drawn backward?
Ah, right, if the input voltage is below the junction drop voltage of the transistor the sourced current doesn't matter at all.
(I once wanted to detect mains voltage via an optocoupler and blown it in, I think, all possible ways due to transients while arriving at something workable that wouldn't continuously dissipate a few watts into a resistor.)
Ah, so it assumes that the input signal can only source quite limited current (otherwise I'd expect the transistor to potentially get blown by high current during turn-on transient: there's nothing in-circuit that limits the inrush current through input, capacitor, and transistor).
@_thegeoff Is the capacitor in series with the input or somewhere else?
Unless the transistor is a FET, I don't see how that can work with a single resistor (I expect a resistor in series with transistor's base is needed, as well as a resistor that will allow the capacitor to both discharge and charge).
gpm provided that functionality on text terminals (using mouse to select and to command pasting): https://linux.die.net/man/8/gpm
@munin Isn't this a similar case to 401k plan providers, who (I think, I haven't been in the US for >5yrs) don't advertise much, because in both cases they are usually selected by company owners?
@enablelanguages I think that people would not consider e.g. the current German flag and Nazi German flag to be different versions of the same flag.
@_thegeoff I'm really curious how uniform will the thickness of the glass be. (I know glass bottles are made that way, but I always assumed that works by careful preforming of the hunk of molten glass that's blown up in the form.)
@_thegeoff Ah, and it's obviously convex (because otherwise how would you extract the final product).
@_thegeoff How are you going to remove the print from within afterwards? Also am curious why would you want the mould to be out of concrete -- it's neither flexible (like silicone) or easy to form (like casting sand).
Ah, so you're thinking of it as a warning sign, in that unexplained drops (or maybe unexpected changes) suggest an undiscovered side effect of an intervention?
@grimalkina Why would we want to increase employee engagement? I don't doubt that it's correlated with things we[1] actually want, but ISTM that it's a poor proxy for them.
[1] regardless of whether "we" is "the company owners", "employees as a group" or any similar entity
I wonder if adding a flag to openat which prohibits dotdot in the path argument itself would be helpful. It's probably way harder to plumb and obviously provides no way to deal with preexisting code, but provides a way to be careful that's much cheaper in terms of amount of coding/thinking/additional dependencies than what's available now.
I enjoy things around information theory (and data compression), complexity theory (and cryptography), read hard scifi, currently work on weird ML (we'll see how it goes), am somewhat literal minded and have approximate knowledge of random things. I like when statements have truth values, and when things can be described simply (which is not exactly the same as shortly) and yet have interesting properties.
I live in the largest city of Switzerland (and yet have cow and sheep pastures and a swimmable lake within a few hundred meters of my place :)). I speak Polish, English, German, and can understand simple Swiss German and French.
If in doubt, please err on the side of being direct with me. I very much appreciate when people tell me that I'm being inaccurate. I think that satisfying people's curiosity is the most important thing I could be doing (and usually enjoy doing it). I am normally terse in my writing and would appreciate requests to verbosify.
I appreciate it if my grammar or style is corrected (in any of the languages I use here).