@freemo people go through hard times and I am sorry for yours. I generally respect you and your position even if we do not agree, I have appreciated the debates we have had over the years.
He is an awkward guy and has made peopel feel uncomfortable.
I followed the cancel culture toward him since 2021 (before then I never gave it much regard) and even before that I read his political notes and when not snippets he is generally making comments from an academic stance. The statements he made about consenting children and adult sex he revoked and agreed it cannot be good because a child cannot consent with adults because and adult is always in a position of authority.
The statements he made about stagitory law regarding state lines is accurate, if you cross a state line sex with a 17 legality can change.
and I believe pyscologists generally agree having sex with prepuberty children is much more psycologically damaging then with post puberty, my stance from the perspective of an adult male is it is wrong to have sex with children and teenages, but like murder there are different degrees of how evil it is. its all bad but some is far more bad then others.
@freemo Since I followed the 2021 cancellation of #RMS I did some research into all the things.
1. what he said about children and adults in sexual relationships he admitted he was wrong and that children having sexual intercoarse with adults its wrong since chidren cannot honestly be contenting.
2. The things he said about stagitory law is accurate the age does change when crossing state lines. it used to be 14 in Canada.
RMS is awkward and has made women feel uncomfortable but I do not think he is guilty of any crime other then opinions. In many of these cases people have even mis represented the truth regaerding his opinions to often.
@freemo it's unbelievable. It is not logical reality.
Maybe it's just a long running social experiment, that would make more sense.
Problem is much of the article is based on half truths and many of the conclusions are wrong/slanderous.
old debunked half truths. either that or the authors lack real logic.
#RMS being cancelled again.
clown world.
@fsf Richard Stallamn is the real world hero.
This picture didnt age well since I cannot see it anylonger .
@bellerome
Yes freedom of speech should be defined clearly.
A great example is if a person comes up behind you points something in your back stating he has a gun and he wants all your money.
Even if you resist, get away with no theft or violence.. that kind of speech is a type of violence.
our supreme laws should be clear.
Directly threatening unquestionable violence, theft or anything that we all clearly identify as crime. however threatening a person with a trial resulting in death penalty or hoping they die in a fire should not be a crime IMO.
no one loves me, anyway I have been using session messanger and dabbling with lokinet.. it is pretty incredible AFAICT
I'm a freedom loving, human loving, nature loving, concerned citizen.