π³π±
On a post tbat is notjing more than a single link to a wikipedia page was enough for facebook tomperminately flag me as a child porn offender. Even upon review they upheld it!
Don't feel bad. A friend of mine studied the T&C and guidelines closely and noticed that it said that nudity depicted in classical art was exempt from the "no nudity" rules.
So, he posted a image of a really old painting, can't remember which one, but in excess of 200 years old.
Temporarily banned for a month!
Appealed by pointing to the clause stating the exemption; Banned upheld after human review.
@freemo Facebook hate links to Wikipedia, last 2 years.
@freemo I'm guessing the moderator has a document in-front of them telling them to look for pubic hair and they're interpreting it very literally.
Meanwhile at FBI HQ:
"We just received a tip about a child porn ring on Faceboo- Damn it, it's a Wikipedia link again!"
@freemo The most hurtful bans are the ones when one is behaving themselves.
@freemo Come on man! You ought to know better than to remain on Failbook!
Why are you even there? π€·ββοΈ