AmpBenzScientist @AmpBenzScientist@qoto.org

@PawelK @lupyuen The code in my repos? It's Reverse Engineered code. It's still not complete but I'm much closer now. I have 6 files that I need to get RE'd to C.

@lupyuen The old ones are there still, the new ones should be far better.

@lupyuen I have all the new code in my github as tar.gz files.

@freemo Have you looked into the open hardware or DIY tools? They can be impressive but are not the most accurate. Cheap and open is definitely a plus.

I got all but about 6 of the blob object files as C code. The quality is much better but I'm still working on getting a complete code base. I think I can get the errors fixed in a couple of days and have it all up.

@PawelK John seems to be in a downward spiral. I'm rather glad that I didn't meet him.

@lupyuen Thank you sir.

@lupyuen I'll see about getting the improved blob code up soon. I'll let you know when it is ready and I'll keep it separate from the older versions.

@freemo Or maybe a dive from Trigonometry to the Derivative and Integral.

@freemo It's a really fun time. That's how I was taught Calculus. It was theory that we had to prove.

@lupyuen I'm getting a much better disassembly and C code. It's almost perfect now. The same code that was crashing disassemblers is now tamed.

@freemo @math It doesn't mean that you shouldn't try to explain your country's dikes and the Mathematics behind them. The Mathematical Proof of Nederland.

@lupyuen @freemo It Disassembles and Decompiles cleanly. :3 I didn't expect this to work that well. :blobcatboo:

@lupyuen @freemo Just be aware that it has errors. I dug through the documentation on the ISA and discovered that the Atomic extension was causing the illegal instructions due to two instructions not being supported with the extension. I'm testing my new processor in Ghidra and I haven't found any of the old warnings yet.

@lupyuen @freemo I ported the proper arch instruction sets into Ghidra.

@freemo @math Standard notation of The AMS requires a solid black square to mark the end of the proof.

@freemo That's really cool! I still have a TI-83 Plus Silver Edition.

@2ck Oftentimes the whys are answered in another course. That's when it becomes clear. Time answers many questions.

@timorl @2ck It is irrelevant if people have different views on Calculus. What matters is that it is presented as theory with rigorous proofs. Mathematics is a field based on proofs. What I stated was not false as theory is required for proper application. It is true that Calculus like operations were being used before the discovery of Calculus. Euler's Method is a good example of this. There are problems that have been proven to not have a solution.
In summary, Theory and rigorous proofs are the foundation. Examples and applications should logically follow after this.