Show newer

What is the best for scientifically literal people who are also activists? People that are aware that the climate crisis is happening, location dependent, and care enough to be motivated to speak out against the business-as-usual craziness of societies.

A community of evidence-based thinkers (informed) that do not simply "cherry pick" whatever "science" aligns with their personal agendas - therefore do not habitually deny and are not ignorant about the science that they don't personally "like" (the idea of)

Empiricism boosted

Please boost this toot as my direct connections on Mastodon are biased (in a good way).

Data (fact). Gas keep on rising. ourworldindata.org/greenhouse-

Question.

Do you think about & make plans that result in fewer greenhouse gases being emitted? For example, having a in your own country, rather than abroad. Using the rather than the . Eating no or less .

Fake Plastic People News!

An elderly man from the Seaside town of Dystopiania has found some grains of sand amongst the plastic.

Generally, many people want to sing kumbaya around a campfire whilst deluding themselves that the campfire's smoke emissions aren't toxic.

However, for those that are aware that the is now inevitable (it is already happening - depending on location), The Post Carbon Institutes Crazy Town podcast is a more sane analysis of all things climate-related

Crazy Town: Episode 75. How to Lose Friends and Demoralize People: The (sic!) of Near-Term resilience.org/stories/2023-05.

The photograph is of some crazy-looking clever guy called Einstein, who apparently said "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".

Of course, within the context of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, most people (of the world) aren't expecting different results - they're simply either being forced (e.g., gotta pay the rent) or choosing to take part in work and recreational activities that are emitting greenhouse gas emissions.

One thing is for sure, as usual is friggin crazy considering the consequences.

Empiricism boosted

Our #LGBTQ Rights Project intern, Lauren, doing crowd engagement like a pro at Greenwood #Pride this weekend!

Happy Pride Week, #HoosierMast!

Empiricism boosted

Six years ago today, I was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer, Hodgkin’s lymphoma. After six months of chemotherapy & a month of radiation treatments, here I still am.

The Affordable Care Act paid for the treatments that saved my life. But Republicans are still attacking it.

Empiricism boosted

Companies ‘greenhushing’ to avoid scrutiny of climate goals, Asic says theguardian.com/australia-news Practice allows companies to claim to have good environmental policies without having them tested, according to Australia’s corporate watchdog. #greenwashing #auslaw #auspol #climate

Empiricism boosted

Are you wanting that holiday abroad? Are you thinking about booking that Jet ✈️ travel trip?

Do you like to kid yourself?, at least in public, that you care about how Greenhouse gases are heating up the Planet's atmosphere? 🤔

Well then, you will want to hear that the WashGreen Airways travel company is offering environmentally friendly Air travel 😀 This means, the more you travel with WashGreen Airways, the more you are helping to save the Planet 😀

Also, every WashGreen customer will be entered into a prize draw with the chance of winning the unfamous book "An idiots guide to not being able to be Honest (even to yourself)"

Empiricism boosted

There are probably more deaf musicians around the world, but Evelyn was the first one devoted to reach out to the world at large and teach us how to truly listen - with all our body, with all our being.

Love her talks as much as her performances :ablobcatheart:

#EvelynGlennie #howtotrulylisten #deaf #listenwithallofyou

youtube.com/watch?v=IU3V6zNER4

Please boost this toot as my direct connections on Mastodon are biased (in a good way).

Data (fact). Gas keep on rising. ourworldindata.org/greenhouse-

Question.

Do you think about & make plans that result in fewer greenhouse gases being emitted? For example, having a in your own country, rather than abroad. Using the rather than the . Eating no or less .

Empiricism boosted

If everybody cycled as much as the Dutch, global carbon emissions would drop by nearly 700 million tonnes per year.

A study from the University of Southern Denmark - published by the Communications Earth and Environment journal - has urged people to saddle up like they do in the Netherlands.

Dutch people cycle an average of 2.6 kilometres each per day. If this pattern was replicated worldwide, the study suggests, annual global carbon emissions would drop by 686 million tonnes.

#climate #climatechange #climatecrisis
euronews.com/green/2023/06/03/

Incompetence as usual.

The data - atmospheric are rising ourworldindata.org/greenhouse-

The evidence - Industries and the people they sell products to are burning huge amounts of carbon-based fuels (e.g., diesel, petrol, gas, wood, etc). Their profit incentive is to sell their core products - not mitigate climate change. Consumers' incentives are to buy more products. Business incentives are to use greenwash to promote their products.

The corruption - The climate conferences are a sell-out

"The Cop28 president, Sultan Al Jaber, has been accused of attempting to “greenwash” his image after it emerged that members of his team had edited Wikipedia pages that highlighted his role as CEO of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc)." theguardian.com/environment/20

The people - generally, live from day to day (not considering the long effects of their actions. e..g, the products they're consuming & using). Effectively, they are controlled by the corporate agenda.

The outcome, the future, is evident!

Hi,

What's the easiest way to backup the "followers" and "follows" addresses?

Rather than copying \ pasting each address individually into a database.

Or trusting a Mastodon instance with that data.

Hi activists (only the genuine ones)

My account at Climate "Justice" social was suspended (deleted) with zero due processes (no warning nor written reason was given. How ironic. "Justice"?)

Though this essay mentions probably why. qoto.org/@Empiricism_Reloaded/

With no admin accountability, we can only guess what goes on behind the scenes. So, users should feel right at home on ;-)

If you were following me at empiricism@climatejustice.social or @empiricism and would like to re-follow. This is the Empiricism_Reloaded@qoto.org account.

Empiricism boosted

Cities: “We are not Amsterdam! We can’t just change, push back car dominance and create liveable cities for people!"

Paris 🇫🇷: "Wait. Hold my wine 🍷🥖 !"

This is one method to prove your identity on Mastodon - should an instance lose, corrupt, or deny you access to your data. For example, an account "suspension" means you can't transfer your account to another instance.

I've written a password-protected blog post at empiricalperspective.home.blog

To quote the blog post

This post is to verify the empiricism @ mastodon account.

My current account is on the qoto instance Empiricism_Reloaded@qoto.org

For people that have not opened an account on Mastodon - Mastodon is similar to Twitter. From the end user's perspective - The main difference is that Twitter is generally controlled (administrated) by one corporation \ owner (e.g., Elon Musk & the company shareholders), whilst Mastodon is controlled by the administrators of whichever instance you have an account on. This means in both cases, other people have control of your data. For example, your "followers" info can be deleted if the admin decides to. The instance can be shut down without notice if the admin decides to. Although that is less probable to happen with Twitter (unfortunately)

Whether it's one central corporation such as Twitter or many Mastodon instances - you are still trusting your data to agents ( administrators) that lack transparency (accountability for their actions & what they do with your data).

However, I prefer the less of two evils - so I'm on Mastodon (until something better comes along)

FYI, having said that, if you have the time and resources (e.g., money), you can choose to manage your own Mastodon instance (for yourself or more people). Although, that would mean either trusting (& usually paying) a service provider to host your mastodon instance. masto.host/ for example -

Or, buying some tech and learning (if you haven't already) to self-host a server that runs a Mastodon Instance.

Personally, I think a person-to-person (p2p) social network is the way to go. Then people will have more control over their own data. However, there is money to be made in social networking, so, what's best for the end users, is often not best for those that are seeking to make a profit out of social networks and or people's data (a conflict of interests).

Evidently, there is a security flaw in Mastodon (see screenshot). It's not prudent to trust unknown admins with our .

Therefore, how do we make the admins more accountable? Or, should the fediverse be developed to be more user-friendly - so that we can connect directly to the network without having to depend on servers? (that is do-able. e.g., p2p networks)


Say no to or unjust

Hi,

My account was suspended (effectively deleted) on climatejustice.social without warning nor was a written reason provided.

I was following you with the previous account. I generally follow people that regularly post about .

So, if you'd like to re-follow me this is my new "reloaded" account on Qoto :)

Have a good day, evening, etc.

Greetings!

Who regulates the regulators? Who regulates the admin? The answer, generally, is no one! They can decide to delete your account, without a warning, at a whim (e.g. if they're in a bad mood, etc) If the admin suspends (deletes) your account, that means you can’t move your account to another instance (you have to start a new one). Account suspension prevents you from transferring the "followers" list. That list could be your friends, colleagues, lover, whistle-blower, you name it.

Effectively, there is zero accountability for Mastodon servers! So, when you read posts that say it doesn't matter what Mastodon server you join, that’s misinformation! Ideally, you’d know and trust the admin personally - that’s the most secure way to protect your data (but, not usually practical). Now if you complain, many admins will say, to paraphrase “You can always run your own server!”. Like they think everyone has the time and resources to do so (it’s just their way of avoiding the problems associated with the network)

My previous account was "suspended", without warning and with no written reason given, by the admin of climate justice social (the irony) climatejustice.social/@empiric . I just received an email that said “Account suspended. You can no longer use your account, and your profile and other data are no longer accessible. You can still login to request a backup of your data until the data is fully removed in about 30 days, but we will retain some basic data to prevent you from evading the suspension”

But, as mentioned. You can’t transfer your followers list (effectively, unless you have copied all the followers' addresses – the admin has deleted them!)

I assume the account deletion was because I'd made an accusation public (a private message from the admin), regarding the unfair conduct of ecoevo.social and climatejustice.social admin (they prefer to do their account warnings, etc, behind the scenes. i.e., no public accountability for their decisions). I posted publicly a link to a conversation I had with another person, in which I said that the OP was being prejudiced. In my public post, I linked to the conversation (made it public) that I was being warned of (by the admin). I asked people (the public on Mastodon) what do they think about the conversation? But, before I received any replies, the account was suspended (deleted).

I've asked this before on Mastodon without receiving any reasonable answer. How can anyone trust Mastodon if people can't backup up their own followers' list? There is no agency in the current system. A server could crash, the owner may just decide to close it or run out of money to finance it, etc.

So, this is a security flaw that should be addressed. The only reason I can think of why this security flaw isn’t been addressed (openly talked about with the seriousness it deserves) is that the server owners, don't believe it’s in their interest. However, evidently, it’s in the Mastodon community's interest to have a system in which they can easily back up the follower's list and have some democratic accountability from the admin. Fundamentally, it should not be up to the servers admin to delete a person's followers list (not even Twitter, Facebook, etc, would do that without any warning! Well, maybe they would, I haven’t used those networks in years)

What methods can a user of the network use to back up the "followers" list? (since the software developers seem to be against it) The last time I asked this, the reply I received, I assume from an admin was to quote "You can download a copy of your follows list". Evidently, intentionally tried to avoid the question I was asking because I stated the “followers” list.

So, can Mastodon be a better alternative to , etc? or is this just lip service? Because business as usual is the money controlling the general flow of information! (& that’s a form of corruption).

For the Fediverse to be decentralized, people will be able to connect to the network without any “middlemen” (that’s a given). So, can we have an adult discussion about what’s best for a social media network? Without it being monopolized and parasitized by the age-old corruption of social power (e.g. money). I doubt it, but…..

or

Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.