Show newer

I've drawn the picture below as a reaction to the current inclination of prominent the(r)orists frowning at "military" style or organizational methods while promoting without and with no need for (everything will change anyway), as a far better, more way of dealing with .

This may be true if the organization is operating and struggling to survive on the left side of this "complexity plane", but if it wants to mature and "get somewhere in life" it better starts aiming for the other side by collecting, documenting and using "lessons learned", planning for and working towards wherever it wants to be in the future.

A momentous recent paper from the most consequential thinker on the matter of the , , and has only 124 views and I must be responsible for at least a dozen.

"Folding is entirely a lawful physical process, leaving neither freedom nor necessity for interpretation. Similarly, the initial converse action-to-symbol conversion of sensory inputs also leaves no freedom for interpretation until after the action-to-symbol conversion"

academia.edu/66621846/Symbol_G

" goes one step further than standard analysis; its aim is to infer not only beliefs or probabilities under conditions but also the of beliefs under changing conditions, for example, changes induced by treatments or external interventions."

"There is nothing in the joint distribution of symptoms and diseases to tell us that curing the former would or would not cure the latter."

J. Pearl - Causal inference in statistics

Statistics Surveys Vol. 3 (2009)
p. 99

ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/r

Show thread

" does not imply causation, but implies a specific pattern of correlations, and that must count for something."

"Testing a is actually not so much about trying to confirm it, but about trying to falsify it."

the100.ci/2022/11/18/causal-in

It's interesting that Ashby never uses the phrase "control system" in the book. For him, it seems, the is also the (potential) .

Show thread

Complexity is in the eye of the beholder (observer)

Ashby: "In this book I use the words “very large” to imply that some definite en, with definite resources and techniques, and that the system (is in) some practical way, too large for him; so that he cannot observe completely, or control it completely, or carry out the calculations for prediction completely. In other words, he says the system (is) “very large” if in some way it beats *him* by its richness and ."

p.62

Show thread

" might, in fact, be defined as the study of systems that are open to but closed to and
control—systems that are “information-tight”."

W. Ross Ashby (1956): An Introduction to Cybernetics, (Chapman & Hall, London): now available electronically.

pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.htm

My latest post - Cybernetics and the Stoics #cybernetics #Stoicism

The impediment to action advances action. What stands in the way becomes the way

harishsnotebook.wordpress.com/

@freemo @alex

In many senses, I find sets high standards for communication in . You have enabled connected services, allowed 65K characters, you have robust policy, we can use markdown in posts, and you are also very welcoming, responsive, and open community!

The 1, 2, 3, and 4 of :
1️⃣ one with a purpose
2️⃣ two (linear work and recursive growth)
3️⃣ three (selection, storage, and production)
4️⃣ four (disturbance, difference, control, and output)

Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.