Show newer

is usually described with as in the article below comparing the works from and :

journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full

Basically, what vector space semantics says is that the meaning of a message depends on the provided by the sender's and the receiver's .

As they are two different physical entities they will obviously be in different states, so the two meaning can never be *exactly* the same.

Show thread

>"Shannon's theory of information ignores . In his communications study, he was only interested in whether the bits transmitted reduce the in a receiver about the sender's state"

Or reducing the uncertainty about what the sender was **meaning** to say?😀

aeon.co/essays/what-can-schrod

>One of the main themes of the present book is the confrontation
between Norbert Wiener and John von Neumann, Wiener embodying the ideas of control, mastery, and design, von Neumann the ideas of complexity and self-organization. Cybernetics never succeeded in resolving the tension, indeed the contradiction, between these two perspectives; more specifically, it never managed to give a satisfactory answer to the problems involved in realizing its ambition of *designing* an autonomous, self-organizing machine.

Show thread

>"The aim of cognitive science always was - and still is today- the mechanization of the mind, not the humanization of the machine."

*Jean-Pierre Dupuy*
***The Mechanization of the Mind:***
*On the Origins of Cognitive Science*
google.ca/books/edition/On_the

Ashby's principle of requisite states, in fact, that the variety of the system must be large at least as the variety of the system .

As an *external* can never have the full picture of the *internal* variety of states the controlled system can find itself in, it is obvious that, for control to be , the controller must be an integral part of the same self-organized (controlled) .

Show thread

Informational Closure in the Human and the Machine: #cybernetics

If one were forced to define information in this regard, it would be something to the effect of “information is that which has the potential to elicit a response.” But here is the catch, what elicits a response is not the information, but the internal structure of the machine.

harishsnotebook.wordpress.com/

People often interpret *Ashby’s Law* (after W. Ross Ashby) as if the *system*'s internal states must have the ***same level of variety*** as its *environment* in order to survive, which implies that the system should be able to *respond* (react) to every little disturbance from the environment.

This is not completely true because, on the lowest, , level, the system blocks from an (environmental) reaching the (internal, system protected) in two ways:

1️⃣ isolation (sheltering) from most environmental disturbances, and

2️⃣ reaction to (parring with) the remaining disturbance that managed to *break through* this passive protection.

from "Intro to "
pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.htm

Except for the fact that nothing in the content of the article explains the preposterous title of **Known Unknowables** (*if a thing is unknowable how can one know about it?*) the article is an excellent read about the evolution of or what calls ***Objectivity in Parentheses***.

aeon.co/essays/four-scepticism

Natural evolves from , not the other way around, so it is rather naive to expect may somehow "spring out" from a , no matter how good they become at producing sophisticated and grammatically correct wordings.

theatlantic.com/technology/arc

Stages of according to :

4️⃣ Incompetence: I think that I know what I'm doing, but I don't;
3️⃣ Conscious : I know that I don’t know;
2️⃣ Competence: I know that I know;
1️⃣ Unconscious : I am doing it without thinking.

>In a society dominated by commoditized relations and alienated values, the attempt to close science off from its relations with the values of its contexts makes a tortuous kind of sense. All the same, however, this undialectical and decontextualizing activity seems ultimately to betray an implicit allegiance to a now venerable religious, psychological, and philosophical tradition: THE QUEST FOR THE ABSOLUTE (as the early nineteenth century phrased it). Indeed, this particular characterization of *the impotent in pursuit of the impossible* may fittingly stand as an epitome of the Imaginary and even morbid quest of the academic discourse for what we might call the *System of Systems* — for the ultimate closed system where desires are facts and All is One. 😀

Show thread

A truly remarkable thinker
**Anthony Wilden** - *** and ***
*Essays in Communication and Exchange* - Second edition (1980)

A classic on and from written back in 1995 when polymer folding was still a *computationally intractable problem*😀.
Still, his thoughts are as powerful as ever.

"Artificial Life Needs a Real Epistemology"

academia.edu/3075569/Artificia

's watchmaking parable about (a lousy artisan) and (an industrial manufacturer) is missing the third watchmaker, , that, after many years of trying, has found a way for the watches to build themselves.

Like , is also an because the watches are built from scratch using raw materials, rather than being assembled from prefabricated modular components.

Despite being blind, Aeon is a much better artisan, because these watches, besides (self)building themselves, are all in working order right from inception, and have the ability to preserve their best, *stable intermediate forms*.

The quest for new *""* energy sources isn't (or shouldn't) be about *hoarding* and having more of something even if it is not needed.
It is about the to do ***more with less*** which is essential for both groups of people mentioned in this piece: the ones that depart on the of new worlds as well as the ones that remain to deal with the problems on this one.

resilience.org/stories/2023-01

>Furthermore, anthropologists report that many of the remaining hunter-gatherers are “fiercely egalitarian”, deploying humour to subdue the ego of anyone who gets out of line: “Yes, when a young man kills much meat he comes to think of himself as a chief or a big man, and he thinks of the rest of us as his servants or inferiors,” one Kalahari hunter told the anthropologist Richard B Lee in 1968. “We can’t accept this. We refuse one who boasts, for someday his pride will make him kill somebody. So we always speak of his meat as worthless. This way we cool his heart and make him gentle.”

theguardian.com/artanddesign/2

Show thread

Hunter-gatherer, societies, in which there is no reason to hoard more than one currently needs, are highly as well as .

From:
*Work: A Deep History, from the Stone Age to the Age of Robots* by **James Suzman**

Source:
Maturana H. R. & Guiloff G. D. (1980) The quest for the intelligence of intelligence. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3(2): 135–148. cepa.info/555

Show thread
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.