@velartrill I think this is largely due to two factors, the popularity of post-modernism (the ideology, not the alias for "stuff i don't like") and the cult/group mentality enabled by social media.
Post-modernism as an epistemological relativistic ideology (i.e. subjective idealism) states that all interpretations of reality are equally valid and that empirical evidence has little to no value. When this is put together with the ability of social media to dehumanize others and create mobs we have the quick and strong rise of the "narrative" that manages to acquire enough acceptance first. From there anyone that deviates from this line of though is quickly cut off, or "cancelled", by the mob.
Of course the fact that the fact that people in general have poor critical capacity, due to the deficient education system in most countries, doesn't help much either.
Why and how post-modernism managed to gain so much acceptance is still a puzzle to me.
The fact that dumb 13 year old kids from /b/ "warned" me about this as early as 2012 makes me feel weird.
gamers rise up i guess?
@velartrill I never considered Abraham Maslow as pop psychology.
Anyways, I'm not defending the author, I'm just autistic. And that was not the most interesting comment. I'm still searching for a last one.
@velartrill That's not my definition, it's a common term in psychology. It appeared in the mid if the 20th century, idk when that book was written though.
I don't even know what book that is.
@velartrill Self-Actualization actually can mean all of that you said but by taking it as having a "successful career" then I agree with your discontent.
In the most general sense self-actualization is just the pursuit of one's ultimate goals, trying to become the person you envision yourself as. The process of self-actualization is often called "becoming who you are". In your case, nourishing a relationship and taking care of your SO and kids would be a process of self-actualization.
Normies can be defined in many ways but they are usually mundane and not driven people. Happy with just living one day after the other.
You on the other hand seem to be very driven, particularly to developing relationships. Idk if this is because of bpd as you say, but from personal experience I can say that, were the values to which you are driven different , the observation about normies would still be the same.
@velartrill "fill a valuable and necessary role, to know your exact place in the world and be comfortable in it"
That could be described as someone's fullest human potential. But I don't have the context of that quote so idk.
One criticism to the cyber truck that I think is valid is that it's hard to load from the side.
Considering that it has a back ramp and can lower the suspension, anyone that likes trucks can tell me whether this is true?
The fact that the outside of the truck is made of tick steel and works as the structure, instead of having a train below it is pretty cool.
@design_RG @metapsyche oi br
@freemo Since you run many other libre services already, invidious might be an nice addition.
It's a libre youtube proxy with no ads, no algorithm and a pure html interface.
@iankenway sad :/
@freemo I think the only way is with mingw. You wouldn't have the necessary libraries to link against, such as win32.dll, on a gnu+linux system.
MinGW does some magic analogous to wine.
I *guess* you could also install cygwin on wine, then gcc on it, then compile it as if you were on windows.
Cross-compiling is usually just for the same OS on different hardware architectures.
"The Web We Have to Save
The rich, diverse, free web that I loved — and spent years in an Iranian jail for — is dying.
Why is nobody stopping it?"
https://medium.com/matter/the-web-we-have-to-save-2eb1fe15a426
Amazing art on the post header. See the FULL SIZE image here, lots of detail: https://miro.medium.com/max/2999/1*DLIqBteIIJchIhaiUfCFdQ.jpeg
@immistermanager holly shit it's a perfect brain seen from below
@sda Look up a philosopher of science called Karl Popper with you want to know more.
Two great places to read about philosophy are:
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
@sda A scientific hypothesis is usually defined as a proposition that is:
1. Reproducible by anyone, anywhere and;
2. Could be proved false.
Those two principles are embodied in the scientific method.
Scientific research is usually made by using the principle of induction. But a scientific hypothesis can be made up by pure random guessing too, as long as it obeys 1 and 2.
Medicine is not usually considered a science because a lot of what doctors do is based on their intuition and personal experiences. Which are not reproducible. Much like engineering, which also is not a science.
Of course both of those rely heavily on science as a tool.
You can have a scientific approach to music. For example a lot of boy bands just do what the market research tells them to do. From lyrics to social media activity.
Since most what we call music does not do that, we don't call music a science.
An interesting example. The following *IS* a perfectly valid scientific hypothesis.
"Water crystals can cure any disease through quantum effects as long as the patient repeats a sacred mantra for at least one hour per day, for 7 days."
The Compass and Straight Edge Giga Chad Thunder-Cock of the network.
All your arguments will be refuted solely with a straight edge and a compass and up to 10 hand made copies will be distributed in the street in a location of my choosing. Since nothing magnificent comes without work the burden of obtaining one of them is on you.
Applied mathematics has no real world applications.