Fair warning fellow tuskers, I do occasionally let out a rude word.
But in my defence, it makes the world a better place.
Consider yourselves warned.
USpol: NY governor
@nytimes has been sounding the alarm on the NY gubernatorial race as if Lee Zeldin, the Republican candidate, has a chance of winning LOL. Nice try
#TIL the curb-cut effect
Controversial opinion
America is losing commitment to free speech across the board. Republicans are legislating censorship and Democrats subscribe to cancel culture that gets people fired for saying unpopular stuff
Controversial opinion
Controversial opinion
Holy hell the twitter exodus is **still** accelerating. The influx of new users is up about 33% from yesterday, our biggest day so far. We are now seeing over 1,300 new users every day on QOTO!
US/UK affirmative action
Recently came to know of this scholarship (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/computer-science/study/scholarships/aspire-award-undergraduate-scholarship) selected and awarded by a prestigious British university, and one of the eligibility criteria is "must be black or mixed-black." Along with the recent U.S. Supreme Court case on affirmative action (Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College), this rekindles my skepticism of race-conscious affirmative action.
1. Logically speaking, UCL's criteria are connected by "and" (i.e., A and B and C and ...), so the fastest way to whittle down candidates is to pick the most stringent one and apply it first. Nonblacks don't qualify anyway so that criterion alone can strike lots of people out. It's arguably the sole reason for rejecting an applicant. Also, how do you quantify blackness? We surely cannot go back to the "one-drop rule."
2. If this were a U.S. public university (as UCL is public), the strict scrutiny analysis is that you need a compelling state interest and it must be narrowly tailored for the public and the government. My question is how can a (black-only) scholarship program that discriminates against diverse candidates in favor of one racial group be narrowly tailored to advance the interest of diversity? This runs directly afoul of Grutter v. Bollinger.
3. The UK does not have a compelling reason to erect a reparative criterion for black migrants, especially with British taxpayer money. I sound like a raging conservative but I don't think I'm being irrational or extreme here. The UK parliament can do all sorts of things to help underprivileged people through legislation, but doling out public resources such as scholarship programs and public university admission cannot be one of them.
@rajutomer it's kind of funny when there are tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars for research equipment, labs, supplies but when it comes to the pays of graduate students somehow there's no money
U.S. politics: elections, Democrats
Dems wrapping up election-day eve on a "democracy is on the ballot" note is probably gonna cost them a lot of seats in Congress. Republicans are undeniably proposing and implementing changes that will erode democratic institutions, but average voters care more about the economy right now. They should've zeroed in on how they stanched economic meltdown, citing the grim circumstances in Europe, and how Republicans are floating massive cuts to social security and health care. I can't help but think dems have, more often than not, so much disconnect with the average voter
Legacy media are writing articles on Mastodon!
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/07/technology/mastodon-twitter-elon-musk.html
Mastodon is really having a moment in mainstream news coverage. CNN, BBC, TIME, etc.
The influx of users will continue at an alarming rate. Remember to be welcoming, and kind, and positive, and helpful.
This isn't just an opportunity to improve the idea of social media, it's an opportunity to shine a wonderful light on #opensource.
6. Even though @DavidSacks@twitter.com apparently consulted Wikipedia before tweeting, he is wrong.
Parody is explicitly protected speech under the Supreme Court precedent (Hustler v. Falwell).
By banning people for engaging in parody, must is censoring people for legal speech
A reminder for anyone new to mastodon who might not be happy with some of the racist and bad actors out there on other servers... Just import the fediblock list to your personal blocks and you will be safe from the vast majority of bad actors.
I am thoroughly enjoying reading posts that are not pre-packaged by an algorithm. In fact I love it. I have found more interesting people over the last few days than the last months in the other place - where essentially you pile up followers but only ever interact with the same 40-50. This place feels, just, better!
As everyone posts interesting stuff, here is a good read from colleagues in Canberra about the latest "major questions doctrine" by the US Supreme Court. Interesting to #law peeps, but more broadly #regulation #socialjustice and #politics
https://slate.com/technology/2022/10/west-virginia-v-epa-regulatory-agencies-technology.html
Digital nomad | Statistics | Clean energy | Politically homeless 🏳️🌈🇺🇸🇰🇷
I'm a statistician specializing in Bayesian inference and statistical computing. I like to keep my professional life separate from my online activities, so that's pretty much all you're gonna get from me.
All views are my own