@design_RG @mngrif @arteteco Seems I'm going to reluctantly have to vote to silence neckbeard, pl, and FSE.

Giving safe harbor to individuals who evade bans and complete inaction regarding resolving it is too big a risk to the safety of our users. If they can no longer block users they wish to block they have no protection against harassment. Since this individual threatened to murder someone it is particularly concerning.

As was seen I reached out to the admin of all three instances and after a long talk none were willing to take action to ban or contain the user in any way.

For these reasons I reluctantly need to vote for a silence.

Any votes from the rest of you or discussion left?

@freemo
>this individual threatened to murder someone
Lemme guess: Jojo.
:eyeroll: :facepalm: :mario_flop:

I'm inclined to lean towards "lol y cant dey jus mute 'em? xD" though with lusers as persistent as Jojo... I suppose you could call me a fence-sitter on this. Instance blocks leave a foul taste in my mouth regardless. And such lusers could easily hop on to any other instance, toss their DM'd threat when they suspect their target is active, and logout while snickering knowing their nasty message hit the mark even if they'll be b& within minutes.

@design_RG @mngrif @arteteco

Follow

@hrisskar

Keep in mind im not proposing an instance block, only a silence and only until the instances change their policy to prevent block evasion.

@design_RG @mngrif @arteteco

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.