🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@qoto.org

ʇsǝɟɹǝɯɯns

@Kambeii@social.quodverum.com How about instead of assuming nonsense that isnt true about my opinions you spend your time focusing that energy on replying to the things I actually said, rather than the things you want to pretend I said.

I dont particularly care what crass nonsense he says behind closed doors nor do I care in the least whether or not Haiti is a shit hole.

@Kambeii@social.quodverum.com

1.7% is not barely existing.

the point about sex is that there are more than 2 sexes, and that those sexes are in the minority.

This is a very obvious point and takes the levels to which you bend over backwards to argue against a point which you effectively agree with is absurd.

The number of people who are intersex are more than large enough to ensure that every day you pass at least one of them, and most likely many.

@ZacharyHerold

@Kambeii@social.quodverum.com
Your point is nonsensical. If you had said something like "There are only people with 10 fingers" you've be just as wrong. But if you said "The majority of people have 10 fingers" you'd be right.

Similarly if you say "There are only two sexes" you are very obviously wrong. However if you say "The majority of people are one of two sexes" then you would be right. But common sense, therefore, should also tell you thats the very reason why people who are not one of the two main sexes are considered a minority because they are.... in the minority.

@ZacharyHerold

@Kambeii @freemo Intersex people exist and therefore your magical world in which everyone is simply male or female is not real.

@Kambeii@social.quodverum.com
That would be great if it were true. Of course it completely ignores the established science of intersex people who clearly are something other than "one of two sexes".

Of course in typical fashion it is also naive to the point. The number of sexes there are has nothing at all to do with a person who is changing their sex from one to the other through surgery.

It is further naive as a pointless republican talking point since it exerts willful ignorance of the historic difference between Gender (what we use in language to refer to someone outside of medical context) and Sex (usually only used when talking medically, or in very close interpersonal relationships where it might be normal to reference your partners genitalia).

@ZacharyHerold

@Kambeii@social.quodverum.com

It isnt just limited to minorities, he has done many things that work against several civil rights issues. I'll list several. In fact this post is so long I will have to do a single year at a time. These are **just** the civil liberties trump has destroyed in 2017 alone. I still have 2 more years of lists I need to compile for you. The following arent my words, they are cited from several sources and I have fact checked each one....

On February 22, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights jointly rescinded Title IX guidance clarifying protections under the law for transgender students.

On February 27, the Department of Justice dropped the federal government’s longstanding position that a Texas voter ID law under legal challenge was intentionally racially discriminatory, despite having successfully advanced that argument in multiple federal courts. The district court subsequently rejected the position of the Sessions Justice Department and concluded the law was passed with discriminatory intent.

On June 28, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division sent a letter to 44 states demanding extensive information on how they maintain their voter rolls. This request was made on the same day that President Trump’s so-called Commission on Election Integrity sent letters to all 50 states demanding intrusive and highly sensitive personal data about all registered voters.

On July 26, Trump declared in a series of tweets that he was barring transgender people from serving in the military. He followed through with a presidential memo on August 25, though the issue is still being challenged in the courts.

On July 26, the Department of Justice filed a legal brief arguing that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation – a decision that contravened recent court decisions and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission guidance.

On August 28, Sessions lifted the Obama administration’s ban on the transfer of some military surplus items to domestic law enforcement – rescinding guidelines that were created in the wake of Ferguson to protect the public from law enforcement misuse of military-grade weapons.

On September 5, Sessions announced that the administration was rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

On September 7, the Department of Justice filed a brief with the Supreme Court in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission arguing that businesses have a right to discriminate against LGBTQ customers.

On October 2, DeVos rescinded 72 guidance documents outlining the rights of students with disabilities, though it wasn’t until October 21 until the public learned of the rescissions.

On October 4, the Department of Justice filed a brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia asking the court to dismiss a lawsuit against the president’s transgender military ban.

On October 5, Sessions reversed a Justice Department policy which clarified that transgender workers are protected from discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

On October 6, the Department of Justice issued sweeping religious liberty guidance to federal agencies, which will create a license to discriminate against LGBTQ individuals and others.

#Trump #uspol #civilrights