Show more

This right here is yet another example of why freedom of speech is so important and why I am appalled by the tendency of the fediverse to demonize it.

pinknews.co.uk/2020/02/25/thir

Whine time!!

>Deepin (tried it out the first time last night) doesn’t “juz werk” with my dualhead setup
>but this time I finally managed to type in the right xrandr settings to make things “good enough”!
>victory!!
>but wait— how to make this start up when I login?
>no autostart commands in Deepin’s simplistic settings
>to summarize the following 2-3 hours: trying to locate multiple files to edit in /etc/ and systemd inits n such which didn’t exist on my system for some reason, learned how to write a simple bash script and make it executable but neither copy-pasting the file nor manually making a desktop file to drop into various autostart folders didn’t work, nor did putting various commands in zsh nor profile nor bash_login did anything…
>now it crashes upon login because of bin/bash/blah / exec dualheadmedammit.sh in profile
>,but you know what I don’t care to pop in a bootable ISO disc to delete that line, I’m just gonna say “screw Deepin and it’s win8-esque, wannabe-mobileOS interface” (as you can tell I wasn't impressed) and wipe the drive and reinstall Manjaro Architect but choosing a different DE
>maybe Budgie or Pantheon just to experiment with something else like I was with Deepin

@hrisskar it's a scheme to attack the credibility of science and education.

He wants people to debate & challenge him - he will refuse in the face of all evidence to concede that the Earth is round, and he will belittle and insult his opponent who claims it is. Eventually his opponent finds something to do that's more fun than talking in circles while being constantly insulted, and the flat-earther will claim victory when his opponent no longer contests the issue.

Now that he's "won" his debate, the flat-earther can attack his opponent in other ways. There's a number of methods by which he can go about doing so:
- he might imply his opponent's education was worthless since he "lost" the debate
- he might seize on simplifications, take comments out of context, or otherwise draw quotes from the debate in bad faith
- he might simply leave his opponent unwilling to challenge him on other subjects of greater controversy.

The flat-earthers tend to be aligned with the political right. Their end goal is often discrediting fields associated with the political left: race and gender study, climate science, evolutionary biology, etc. Sometimes the scheme more broadly targets higher education in general, which is seen as left-aligned in North America.

Similar strategy is employed by religious (Ken Ham, known for debating Bill Nye on creationism) and political (Steven Crowder, known for his "change my mind" sign) advocates in debate. The way to evade this particular trap is to refuse to allow your opponent to frame the debate such that they "win" if they don't concede.

11% done copying over everything I want to save from my PC before I wipe it and reinstall the OS.
Time remaining? Almost 2hr...
About to push aside my keyboard and plop my laptop in front of me.

As I am here to get cookies
Thinking about poorly recording a video on how to make sparkling water with a tube, juice containers and baking powder
Who would like it?

I feel like social.quodverum.com is for conservatives afraid to use it

"There are two ways of constructing a software design:

One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.

The first method is far more difficult."

C. A. R. Hoare, The Emperor’s Old Clothes, 1980 Turing Award Lecture

Am I the only one who finds ASMR anything but relaxing? It makes me furious to hear the hissing whispering.

Show more
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.