rastinza @rastinza@qoto.org

@errantscience Cool, I have to make this a banner to anyone connecting to the computation cluster

@mariannabolognesi @cognition @nlpbot@mstdn.social @nlp @openai @linguistics Si vede che deve ancora fare le elementari!

Sto avendo una fervente discussione epistolare con Massimo Fini ed ho provato ad utilizzare #ChatGTP per rimettermi le frasi un po' a posto.
Mi ha sparato fuori questa perla "Meglio non riportare i dati in modo errato, piuttosto che riportarli del tutto."

@0ciX_reloaded@mastodon.bida.im Questo è legale?

@ferryoons @Strandjunker In fact, it is impossible to be neutral about things; expecting that will lead to failure.
When you study history you'll find some things you like and some things you don't like, but you should try to determine the facts regardless of which opinion you have about them.
Some people you won't like, but you should find all that there is to be found about them, not only the information underlying their bad characteristics. Moreover, it would be positive to analyze the reasons behind certain decisions taken by trying to understand their mentality; this is certainly a difficult task.

@Strandjunker "We need a remembrance day"

@aspuru @KellyKellyKelly@masto.ai Yes, it's quite impressive, I was not expecting that. I didn't take a screenshot as I was just testing if that could be useful in practice, I just took the screenshot when I used it in a useful way.
Now that I think about it, it may be nice to investigate the performance and practicality of this system and write a short guide on how to use it effectively. If I do that I'll make sure to repeat a similar sequence and send you a screenshot.
However, I'm doubt I'm expert of enough topics to validate it. It may be nice to have some people send a topic they know with a list of fundamental methodologies and facts that have to be known to see if these can be identified by someone who is not an expert by using this method.

I was really surprised by it knowing the research groups and the names of their members as well as academic affiliations. It shocked me especially for PASITHEA, as much as it is a great and revolutionary approach I doubt it was mentioned in a lot of places.
I can imagine SELFIES being talked about in some blogs or something like that, I'd imagine no more than 100 documents talking about it; but I doubt PASITHEA ever got that much attention. This means that #ChatGTP is able to keep track of things even with a very minimal amount of data provided.

@liaizon Fails to log me in altogether... oh well

@KellyKellyKelly@masto.ai Yes, you can go on and ask more specific questions even about very recent topics. The amount of mistakes grows with the specificity and novelty of the investigated topic.

Of course before doing this I used it on some topics I'm more adept of. Yesterday I asked it a series of more specific questions about a novel topic: machine learning based de novo molecular structure generation for drug design. This is a fairly new research field, with the first article published around 2017. It did give a broad overview of the topic, listing some of the methodologies that have been used and developed. Several errors were present, but with a bit of critical reading and validation you could quickly draft a list of most significant innovations in the field.
The last and most specific question I was able to ask was a list of the research groups working in the field and what they focus on. The list was very incomplete and contained research groups working on other related fields, but some of the groups listed were actually relevant; it was able to give me the names of some of the persons working in each group, the location and a brief overview of what they do.
I don't know if other groups are here on Mastodon, but I'll mention @aspuru since his group was correctly listed by chatgpt, as well as their involvement with SELFIES and PASITHEA.

I mean, 5 minutes ago I didn't know what an MTT assay was. It was what I had in mind and what I was more or less searching for, but had no specific idea of how it worked and what it was.
Now I know what it is and I know where to find specific information about the methodology if I need to.
And I even had the time to write this post...

Normally, I'd have to find a review about these methodologies and skim through it to find the one I was interested in.

I'd say it is quite useful to quickly get a birds eye view of a topic.
Do you trust anything written in there? Obviously not, but you can find a lot of useful keywords related to a topic you know nothing about and save yourself quite some time.

#chatgpt

@hasmis I frankly didn't understand what you meant. I have noticed American people often don't realize the world is vast and that many people are not adept to the social and political mechanisms that are normal over there. I have asked you to explain what you said, I don't see why you should insult me by implying I'm locked in my ideology and I'm not willing to listen to different opinions.
Now, I'm interested in this lawyer cartel. Would you explain what you mean?

@hasmis What do you mean?

I didn't know about all this thing, never seen anything about it on local newspapers.
Johnson and Johnson had been sued by several people because apparently some of the baby powder it sold contained asbestos, which led to several young people developing cancer.
Recently, the company opened a spin off and gave it ownership of that product, and with it the legal liability. That company filed bankruptcy, thus victims will not be compensated.

Quite disgusting story. Shame on the USA governments allowing companies to behave in such a way.
I found out the company is in one market index I own; I'm considering selling that and getting something else.
https://www.npr.org/2022/09/19/1123567606/johnson-baby-powder-bankruptcy-lawsuits

#Johnson #company #fraud