robryk @robryk@qoto.org

@buherator @malwaretech

So both him and the unnamed 17-year-old stalked people?

@phil

Well, they must always be charged, or they wouldn't be polar :)

@_dm control arm of unprompted people or unprompted people who also didn't search?

@_dm the paper's text talks about differences between experiment arms which were or weren't prompted to search though (contrary to figure labels). Do you know which thing they actually measured?

@_dm have you figured out whether they were looking at the effect of searching, or effect of being prompted to search?

@lauren isn't the main problem with mercury not acute toxicity, but that it doesn't leave the body once absorbed?

Which end of the polar bear is positively charged?

@b0rk it's kinda hard to follow this advice when the problem is "there is no consistent model how this should work": any single problem you have can be fixed by one more epicycle it by just knowing about this one more piece of usually helpful magic. (Examples that I encountered recently: systemd-resolved and choosing which interface to use for a request, nix flakes' treating top level of flakes specially.)

@hellbeast@bark.lgbt

> Oh and please don't take it for granted that your account can interact with something. Thanks.

Would you mind writing more about this part? I always assumed that the important property deciding whether I'm welcome to interact with something is the interaction itself and not my account's identity.

@whitequark there was once a study where people gave various drugs to web spiders and looked at the webs they spun, so that they could do that in the future to identify drugs by feeding spiders with them.

@lauren

The experiment from the paper involved asking people to search online explicitly. The paper left me confused regarding whether they are looking for effects of being asked to search, or correlation with actually searching (text says former, figure labels say latter).

@cr1901 @philpem @whitequark

Note that this is a Julian date.

@zwizwa @dpiponi if that were the case, vibrating the plate should not change the shape. I would expect otherwise.

@polamatysiak

Skąd się wzięło połączenie aktywów państwowych oraz energii i klimatu w jednej komisji? (Z opisu komisji na stronie sejmu wynika, że nie chodzi tylko o aktywa związane z produkcją energii.)

@sgf I am more worried about instances being able to gaslight other instances and that editing plus refusing to sign objects when they are pulled makes proving that it has happened much harder.

@freemo and presumably on carrying them? (For example in CH access to guns is pretty open, albeit in most cases carries a registration requirement, but carrying them other than to move them between places is mostly illegal.)

Many European people will find what you are saying confusing or misunderstand it. I'd rather phrase it as "unrestricted access and unrestricted carry".

@freemo the point about guns is unclear for two reasons. First is not a phrasing that will mean things to people unfamiliar with the US. Secondly, I can't tell whether you want to say "whatever the constitution of the country says goes", "everyone should have a right to carry guns they could use at ~all times unless sentenced to a loss of that right", something in-between, or something significantly different.

@psn @danluu

Why doesn't that work in TV? This is the format of all(?) the Poirot movies starring Suchet.

@sebastian @ftdl

Gdyby administracja miała taki feature do dyspozycji, to mogliby go użyć tymczasowo aby jednocześnie (a) zablokować spam od nowych kont (b) nie wpływać na komunikację użytkowników, którzy już kiedyś się ze sobą komunikowali.