Show newer

@sgryphon Indeed I had the time to try it, and it works very well, I can now access that ipv6 server from my ipv4 network. Thanks!

@bob @bjoern @codesections

Democracy is NEVER about empowering tiny numbers of "elites" from any prospective.

We need structers without centralisation. Don't grasp POWER, spread POWER

#indymediaback #4opens #OMN

RT Ryan Sean Adams - rsa.eth 🏴
Federal Reserve of St. Louis drops a paper on DeFi

"DeFi may potentially contribute to a more robust and transparent financial infrastructure."

They even nail the diagram of the DeFi stack.

Q: Someone at the Fed reading @BanklessHQ?

A: Yes.

👇 research.stlouisfed.org/public
twitter.com/RyanSAdams/status/ #Crypto #Blockchain #FED #FederalReserve #StLouis

--
Powered-By Community News Site:
ChestertonEagle.com

Started running D&D Curse of Strahd recently. One of the players used popular culture for inspiration and then created a custom miniature to match.

Have an only site or homeserver that you want to make available to ipv4 clients - try a free CDN service like who will proxy it for you.

@aluaces I just tested Cloudflare free plan on one of my websites. The site only has an AAAA address, but Cloudflare proxies both A and AAAA for you.

@aluaces also, check your mobile provider, as some support IPv6 but may not enable it. e.g. Telstra, in Australia, has had IPv6 for a long time, but only recently been configuring for dual stack (and now some are single stack IPv6).

@aluaces to make an IPv6 site available to IPv4 you need someone with an IPv4 address to provide a proxy. e.g. my hosting provider, Mythic Beasts, provides that for all customers.

Some content delivery networks (CDNs) also provide IPv4 proxy services. Some CDNs have free tiers, try Cloudflare.

Otherwise you need to pay for a very cheap dual stack server (all it needs do is proxy).

If you don't want general availability, you could also try an IPv6 tunnel broker, that will run an tunnel (over IPv4) to your device, e.g. laptop, allowing it to access IPv6 only resources. Try Hurricane Electric.

Again note that if you are self hosting on IPv4 then you would also be using NAT to the private range. The difference is not NAT (both use it), but whether you have an IPv4 address to use with the NAT.

@matrix well Elon Musk recently tweeted to not use Discord, so maybe something similar is happening to Signal. Has there been an upsurge in usage?

@aluaces IPv4 usually require NAT anyway.

At least with an IPv6 server there is only one NAT, compared to hosting provider NAT to 10.x range, then virtual machine NAT to 192.168 range, then container NAT to 172.16 range.

An IPv4 private 172.16 k8s pod is as unreachable by an IPv4 client as IPv6. Any solution with IPv4 (even without IPv6) needs NAT.

@aluaces to be more specific, you don't need to set up IPv4 on the IPv6 machine, or your internal network, hence simplifying as you only need one set of configuration, one firewall, etc. (compared to dual stack).

You do however need to have IPv4 access on some other (single) machine to act as an outgoing NAT64 / incoming proxy.

But this is largely the same for IPv4 as you only have private IPv4 addresses so for outgoing need to go through NAT44 and incoming needs to port forward/proxy.

The gateway needs a public IPv4 address in both cases, but the rest of the IPv4 world does not know (can not tell) if your internal network is an IPv4 private range or IPv6.

@freemo @General there are plenty of decent Christmas movies - Die Hard and Lethal Weapon are two that come to mind :-)

@aluaces about 30% of the Internet (>50% in some countries) has IPv6 now.

But yes, for the other 70% for outgoing you need something like NAT64 (but seeing as a lot of outgoing uses NAT44 anyway, not a big difference).

For incoming you need something like a CDN or reverse proxy gateway (an IPv6 hoster may provide this for free). I have some blog entries on the subject: sgryphon.gamertheory.net/2021/

In my case, it is for me to remote access my services, and I have IPv6 on my mobile provider as well, so I don't really care if other people don't have access (they wouldn't be able to log in anyway).

@General

“All right," said Susan. "I'm not stupid. You're saying humans need... fantasies to make life bearable."

REALLY? AS IF IT WAS SOME KIND OF PINK PILL? NO. HUMANS NEED FANTASY TO BE HUMAN. TO BE THE PLACE WHERE THE FALLING ANGEL MEETS THE RISING APE.

"Tooth fairies? Hogfathers? Little—"

YES. AS PRACTICE. YOU HAVE TO START OUT LEARNING TO BELIEVE THE LITTLE LIES.

"So we can believe the big ones?"

YES. JUSTICE. MERCY. DUTY. THAT SORT OF THING.

"They're not the same at all!"

YOU THINK SO? THEN TAKE THE UNIVERSE AND GRIND IT DOWN TO THE FINEST POWDER AND SIEVE IT THROUGH THE FINEST SIEVE AND THEN SHOW ME ONE ATOM OF JUSTICE, ONE MOLECULE OF MERCY. AND YET—Death waved a hand. AND YET YOU ACT AS IF THERE IS SOME IDEAL ORDER IN THE WORLD, AS IF THERE IS SOME...SOME RIGHTNESS IN THE UNIVERSE BY WHICH IT MAY BE JUDGED.

"Yes, but people have got to believe that, or what's the point—"

MY POINT EXACTLY.”

― Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

Quote

RT @HotepJesus
I'm speaking with @ComicDaveSmith about U.S. Politics, the libertarian party, anarchy, internet censorship and more...

at 7 PM ET

youtu.be/7WdzJPhfWro 👈

Please like and subscribe to bump the algo!

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.