Pinned toot

1️⃣ Kihbernetic with
2️⃣ fundamental : a recursive self-production for growth and learning, and a linear production of “other things”, such as behavior and waste, distributed in
3️⃣ Control , of , immersed in, and dealing with things in the system’s environment, for managing the workload of different regulators, and to provide long-term goals and preserve the identity of the system, all using
4️⃣ : sensory of data and other resources, motor of behavior, as the difference that will make a difference in the subsequent (updated) state, all interconnecting
5️⃣ : the -ed to external stimuli, the of sensory states, the of the expected outcome of past behavior, and the repeated of new information into an updated knowledge state.

Most theories of start with while a proper way to address any neural theory of consciousness should be as a science because the primary function of the nervous system is not to process information but to control the body.

Most control is internal to the system, a distributed, analog, homeostatic unconscious 1️⃣ of essential internal variables that are keeping the body alive and well. None of the mechanisms on this level “cares” about what is happening outside of the body.

Only on the next level do we find the kind of information necessary for the rate-dependent negative mechanisms 2️⃣ keeping some external controlled variables within limits engaging (through the use of regulators) in performing whole-body actions (behavior) in the immediate environment. Those actions can be conducted either consciously or unconsciously.

Finally, on the highest level, we have the rate-independent, open loop always conscious 3️⃣ maintaining the long-term goals and providing stability and direction to the lower level of control that will plan, implement, and track the fulfillment of those goals.

Show thread

Even if you are gullible enough to believe LLMs are like brains, with their own ‘minds’, you must surely realize that they are ‘brains in a vat’.
There are three ways one can take from here:
1️⃣ Use them as intelligence amplification tools;
2️⃣ Equip them with bodies;
3️⃣ Join them inside the vat.😏

A is not something that can be found in an observer’s mind. Representations are physical copies or models of the object they represent and they are all residing in the same domain external to the observer’s mind.

According to , a (the representation) is something that brings its (the ), into the same sort of correspondence ( of mind) as the it stands for. Therefore, and exist in a different domain internal to the system

= .

The representation can be a , or the re- of the object using the same the object is made of (e.g. a carbon copy of a page or a copy of a living cell). In contrast, a (a map) is the reproduction of the object’s form in a different substance.

Unlike real (artisanal) art, the reproduction (copy) of “digital art” is indistinguishable from the original. In addition, what is usually referred to as the “digital copy” of a physical work of art, is, in fact, a digital model of the real object it represents.

Although the history of science and ideas is not my field, I could not imagine adopting Alfred North Whitehead’s opinion that every science, in order to avoid stagnation, must forget its founders. To the contrary, it seems to me that the ignorance display ed by most scientists with regard to the history of their discipline, far from being a source of dynamism, acts as a brake on their creativity.

On the Origins of Cognitive Science - The Mechanization of the Mind

by J-P Dupuy and translated by M. B. DeBevoise

An examination of the fundamental role cybernetics played in the birth of cognitive science and the light this sheds on current controversies.

mitpress.mit.edu/9780262512398

A Springer Open access book from @decidim

Decidim, a Technopolitical Network for Participatory Democracy

Philosophy, Practice and Autonomy of a Collective Platform in the Age of Digital Intelligence

link.springer.com/book/10.1007

The difference between a and a is that a transformer can reformulate (modify the form) of the same substance, while a transducer can reproduce the form observed in one kind of substance into the same form but in another type of substance. This kind of reproduction is usually called the .

Terrence W. Deacon writes beautifully about this conundrum:

royalsocietypublishing.org/doi

I have a somewhat different position on his second statement, however.

I think there is a self that determines how the system responds to an external perturbation.

Show thread

Found it! 😎. It is called the
Maximum Entropy Production Principle ():

The so-called maximum entropy production principle (MEPP) is known much less (even among specialists in physics of nonequilibrium processes). This antipode, as its name seemingly means, of Prigogine’s principle has been overshadowed by its more famous twin. MEPP was independently proposed and used by several scientists throughout the 20th century when they dealt with general theoretical issues of thermodynamics and statistical physics or solved specific problems. By this principle, a nonequilibrium system develops so as to maximize its entropy production under present constraints.

sciencedirect.com/science/arti

Show thread

A system doesn’t feed on (or ) from the environment it has to create it.

You can’t get your desk organized by just acquiring some order from the environment. You have to do some and use some of your . Schrödinger admits as much:

Show thread

as the ultimate form of is usually thought of as resisting the Second Law of thermodynamics that says all eventually dissipates over time into a state of thermal equilibrium and enduring uniformity (disorder).

An alternative explanation says that organization (order) spontaneously emerges in dissipative structures because of the Second Law of Thermodynamics because ordered structures are much better at dissipating energy (thus more rapidly increasing the ) than disordered ones.

The explanation (for which I now can’t find the proper reference😟) exemplified this with whirlpools and how they spontaneously emerge because the water molecules in them don’t bump into each other as much so the flow through the drain (transition to an equilibrium state) is faster when they are streamlined (organized) into a vortex.

and

I trusted a lot today. I trusted my phone to wake me on time. I trusted Uber to arrange a taxi for me, and the driver to get me to the airport safely. I trusted thousands of other drivers on the road not to ram my car on the way. At the airport, I trusted ticket agents and maintenance engineers and everyone else who keeps airlines operating. And the pilot of the plane I flew in. And thousands of other people at the airport and on the plane, any of which could have attacked me. And all the people that prepared and served my breakfast, and the entire food supply chain—any of them could have poisoned me. When I landed here, I trusted thousands more people: at the airport, on the road, in this building, in this room. And that was all before 10:30 this morning.

schneier.com/blog/archives/202

"A public model is a model built by the public for the public. It requires political accountability, not just market accountability. This means openness and transparency paired with a responsiveness to public demands. It should also be available for anyone to build on top of. This means universal access. And a foundation for a free market in #AI innovations. This would be a counter-balance to corporate-owned AI." #trust schneier.com/blog/archives/202

Questo è il Soluzionismo: L’Influenza di Zuckerberg e Musk nell’Economia Digitale Mondiale

Un nuovo studio del #sociologo economico Oliver #Nachtwey dell’Università di Basilea e del suo collega Timo #Seidl dell’Università di #Vienna esamina l’influenza delle idee di Mark #Zuckerberg e Elon #Musk sulla moderna economia digitale.

I #ricercatori hanno analizzato #discorsi, #libri e #articoli provenienti dalla #SiliconValley, rivelando un nuovo spirito del #capitalismo digitale.

Condividi questo post se hai trovato la news interessante.

#redhotcyber #online #it #web #ai #hacking #privacy #cybersecurity #cybercrime #intelligence #intelligenzaartificiale #informationsecurity #ethicalhacking #dataprotection #cybersecurityawareness #cybersecuritytraining #cybersecuritynews #infosecurity

redhotcyber.com/post/questo-e-

1️⃣ Kihbernetic with
2️⃣ fundamental : a recursive self-production for growth and learning, and a linear production of “other things”, such as behavior and waste, distributed in
3️⃣ Control , of , immersed in, and dealing with things in the system’s environment, for managing the workload of different regulators, and to provide long-term goals and preserve the identity of the system, all using
4️⃣ : sensory of data and other resources, motor of behavior, as the difference that will make a difference in the subsequent (updated) state, all interconnecting
5️⃣ : the -ed to external stimuli, the of sensory states, the of the expected outcome of past behavior, and the repeated of new information into an updated knowledge state.

’s preoccupation with mathematics, echoed in ’s commitment to mechanical models and ’s conception of formal descriptions, largely excluded social phenomena in which cybernetics was practiced.”

’s last paper

constructivist.info/19/1/082.k

A 3D of a natural can be visualized as created from the interaction of 2D made of and of that modulate (change the form of or constrain) each other, leaving a 1D as a record of how their interaction unfolds in .

All must be open-ended. The learning agent (the ) must have the to set its own learning goals as well as plan and execute a of activities to achieve these goals.

One can never learn all existing data but rather refine their understanding of the data that is available to them. As true for human intelligence, you can either have “deep and narrow” specialized agents or “average and broad” . You can’t have both in the same entity. Time and “limitation” are the main inspirations for and between learning agents.

People should have figured it out by now that the of processing power, not the in gargantuan data and control centers is the right thing to do.

Stop working on LLMs (Large Language Models) and start working on PCAs (Personal Customizable Assistants).

From: arxiv.org/pdf/2311.00344.pdf

The current craze over social media ruining democracy and AI posing an existential threat to humanity stems from the fact that most people don’t understand that the only thing is able to do is amplify their own capacity to do good or bad.
The Internet and AI are communication and intelligence , the same way motors and servo mechanisms are amplifiers of our muscle power.

Show more
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.