AmpBenzScientist @AmpBenzScientist@qoto.org

@skyblond So the performance is inadequate? Those two examples should be possible for college students.

Some might say that it would be harmful to society to have such capabilities. I remember learning about the designs of fission weapons in elementary school. The fission fusion chain was a bit more advanced. The knowledge is beneficial and the chance of someone achieving anything more than a fizzle is incredibly low.

One shouldn't need the instructions as better quality instructions and actual science are located in a library.

With that out of the way, can it make malware?

@freemo If you could find a way to give workers diplomatic immunity, they could be retained indefinitely.

@lupyuen
Some people might think that Go is a useless language. It works really well for malware.

@lupyuen It's beautiful to see China doing well. Through the USSR, Russia and US restrictions on the export of knowledge, China has succeeded.

The Article points out Alibaba and SiFive as manufacturers of RISC-V while it would be T-Head that makes a physical product. SiFive is fabless which means they hoard any information and only take from the community. T-Head posts Verilog of their creations for the world to see and use. SiFive doesn't deserve to be on the same list.

RISC-V was indirectly and likely unwittingly helped by DARPA. It's odd that the US is so anti freedom that it forced RISC-V out of the country. So perhaps a better summary is that the US was incompetent and China did something smart. That move was apparently not allowed because the US government allows corporations to own thoughts and ideas.

As an American I find it humorous but I'm still waiting for the punchline of the CCP messing it up like the RISC-X talks. Leave it to governments to take credit for something they had no part in and make it political. At least the surveillance systems in China will be less expensive.

Hopefully the inexpensive SoCs will be functional and have accurate documentation. RISC-V has always had challenges with all three and I suspect that the first few generations are going to be ewaste. That should sum up my commentary on the article. The hints of propaganda were appreciated.

@freemo A large RepRap that prints the notification on the surface. Also a spare RepRap to print replacement parts.

@freemo So low surface tension fluid would potentially be subject to the mass of fluid above it and the reduced strength of the Force thing. Less tension holding the sphere together, likely higher pressure at the same depth because of molecular mass and forces being too weak to form a larger bubble with ease.

So with water and its surface tension I would think that larger bubbles are possible to form at deeper depths. The air sphere would be under more pressure and that pressure would have to overcome the surface tension to have less molecules of air.

I think an air bubble at sufficient depth would be smaller and grow upon rising. At a certain point it would overcome the forces and make more bubbles. It would be like a histogram. I think the inverse of the histogram would model a low surface tension fluid with all other factors taken into account.

If these suspicions are partially correct, I wouldn't be surprised. I fully expect to be wrong about something. All I know is that I don't know and I will know that I know less by replying.

@thor It looks like the emotional stability of a Mathematician throughout a normal day.

@thor Weapons, drugs and war crimes.

@Draven Tammy.