New posting! This one contains a few reflections on what I do, and don't, miss about my life in #academia.
https://totalinternalreflectionblog.com/2024/01/28/only-in-the-abstract/
You are absolutely correct here, Agreed. Thank you for setting him straight.
@AmpBenzScientist @freemo in the US at least, the mortality data were not falsified despite reports to the contrary. Indeed, two papers by the same authors looking at mortality suggested a ~20-30% undercount during the early pandemic (higher early on, lower later on). This was most likely due to poor test availability, out of hospital deaths, and shoddy reporting early on.
@mcnado @freemo After reviewing the CDC reporting, the complications possibly caused by infection would result in the stated cause of death to be from COVID-19. It further points out that the long term effects resulting in death would be considered a COVID-19 death.
The situations leading to death weren't properly addressed. Regardless of proper classification, the likely damage from the virus was rightfully included. I suppose I was expecting ARS to be the cause of the deaths and, to a lesser degree, cardiovascular issues.
It seems more inclusive for contributing factors of a COVID death but not necessarily represented correctly. The car example was dismissed incorrectly. According to the guidelines, if COVID-19 contributed to the circumstances then it would indeed be reported as a COVID-19 death even if the subject could have lived if they weren't driving. It's these small things that make me question the data.
Cause, Contributing factor and the Others should be separated. It sounds like the virus directly killed so many people. It just seems misleading to call them all COVID deaths when it would be better to describe them as Covid and common complications deaths.
@AmpBenzScientist While I dont doubt there were a few examples of someone engaging in inflated numbers to get aide as was pointed out overall when you consider all the effects that create inaccurate numbers overall the numbers were under reported not over
@freemo That's impressive.
@AmpBenzScientist the choice is really just between what physical connector you want. v5 are pretty much all the same its just do you want usb a, c, thunderbolt or nfc
@freemo @mcnado The Death Data was falsified by some facilities due to the financial assistance offered to assist with the additional money spent on combating covid. It was fraud and elderly care facilities were able to get away with it. A family friend died from Alzheimer's and he was reported as having died from COVID around 2 months later. He was cremated. My family reported it but it fell on deaf ears.
About the data for Medicine, I've made Mathematical models for outbreaks. I'm not an expert at it but we would have to limit variables and environmental factors. Even then it would take about as many revisions as a TeX document to get some level of accuracy. Then again with so many limits on data, I couldn't consider it accurate.
With actual data it could prove useful. The long term effects of COVID are not known, the long term effects of the jabs are unknown and the combined effects of both are certainly unknown. Is it actually important? Nope. The data will be collected and processed anyway thanks to our benevolent government.
@freemo I appreciate it. I'll have to try one or a few out.
@AmpBenzScientist Depends what algo you want to use and what key size... any v5 is your best bet though.
@mcnado @freemo It did spread for a few years and took out the most susceptible.
Long term data would be nice even if it's blatantly falsified like the death data.
We can't have a control group because nearly everyone was exposed. We don't have a healthy non jabbed group because the government and the public persecuted these people.
Being in the latter group, it's difficult to show empathy as anything other than mockery. Problems quoting inaccurate data? Corruption dragged its fat sack of influence and manipulation over your profession. Medicine will have to regroup and reform to get back to some level of integrity. That's going to be a long fight.
@freemo Do you recommend a specific model of key?
I am watching the new #Disney movie The little mermaid. I am really enjoying how they used factually accurate (And in some cases not very well known) sea creatures. They also put a lot of attention into making their movements more or less accurate as well.
I was particularly excited to see the feather stars.
That said they arent region appropriate, I dont think I recall ever seeing a feather star in the Caribbean. I can let it slide :)
TCC #RISCV Compiler, compiled to #WebAssembly by #ZigLang Compiler ... Generates correct ELF Code! 🎉
Source: https://github.com/lupyuen/tcc-riscv32-wasm#tcc-webassembly-runs-ok-in-a-web-browser
#Ox64 BL808 UART Controller has Leaky Reads and Writes ... But there's a simple fix!
Article: https://lupyuen.codeberg.page/articles/plic3.html#leaky-reads-in-uart
@AmpBenzScientist Yeah, I also remembered the fake moon. That level of modification would cause problems if you try to take a picture to proof something in legal related events.
For casual use, I'd say it's fine to use the default camera app. But taking picture of a bird or something I want no additional processing, hopefully the pro settings will disable the post-processing.
@skyblond It should have it. It would need to be processed to be visible but there should be a setting to take a jpeg of the same picture at the same time.
RAW isn't a better camera but so much can be done in processing that the quality is night and day. The raw image format is essentially a data dump from the sensor so it includes everything. The Camera2 API makes this functionality available if it's not in the default photo app.
@skyblond I started using the Camera2 API in Android to take raw images years ago. I got an OP Nord and the pictures were the most disturbingly melancholic images I've ever seen. I just use Open Camera from F-Droid to avoid that or I try to find the Pro settings on a Samsung to get RAW images.
The S23 was impressive. I remember trying the burst mode at max speed. It was under an LED light and I could see the fluctuation of 60Hz in action. I did the math and found that a 45acp fired 10m away from me would lead to several photos of the bullet in flight before exiting my FOV.
I also remember the fake Moon. Never forget the fake Moon.
Well, if it's a trend, you can't really resist it.
Somehow those manufacturers thought their customers would be happy with the new AI things. Samsung's S24 series is a bit retreat on hardware, but a lot of new things happened on software, but not necessary.
For people I know, most of them are not happy with the s24 series. For example the camera. S23Utlra has an optical 10x zoom lens, but on S24Ultra it changed to 5x zoom, and now you're relying on AI post-processing to get hopefully the same result from optical 10x lens. But if I had 10x zoom lens in the first place, why do I have to fake my picture? (Yeah, I think AI post-processing produces a fake photo.)
When they bundled features together, you have to give up a set of features to avoid one thing.
Toughbook fan, Mathematician and Locksmith with limited success in other areas.
Political stance is far right and far left. Proponent of First Aid Kits and PPE. Easily disheartened by big tech. Partially hinged personality and stubborn enough to not write this in the First Person.
Distrust of Psychology and a fan of satire. I love a good joke and contradict myself. Somewhat serious but easily distracted.