Show newer

Bah! My writing is indeed very sloppy this morning. I shall invest in better configuring (and listening to!) a spell checker in my editor.

Show thread

# Reading notes, scrapbooking, social media reposting and copyright

**_How does Fediverse feel about copyright infringement running rampant on social media? Think quoting, linking to visuals, boosting, reposting, etc._**

I am thinking about publishing my reading notes frmo the last year. It's not a blog, rather a collection of excerpts and quotes I want to remember and refer to later on. The purpose is to build a pile of material from which I then synthesise. Because that's how I work and thing - any many others too (see the boom of interest in Zettelkasten, note taking etc.).

I keep my notes privately and that's OK. I also realised that there is an ingerent value in making them public. It forces me not to be too sloppy and get to the point. All is good.

Now, I am a smart guy too and I heard about this thing called copyright. And fair use. And right to quote policy. Etc.

The problem is this:
1. extensive quoting, excerpting and annotating from 3rd party materials is a useful way to study and do research.
2. private note taking like this is protected by copyright limitations in most (if not all) jurisdictions.
3. making such notes public, can be quite useful for fellow souls on a similar research journey.
4. publication of such a scrapbook, however, infringines on copyright of the original authors. One can argue about subtleties here, but copying whole paragraphs (which is useful!) clearly is a potential problem.

Which leaves me with several options:
1. keep the notes private and thus make the world somewhat poorer (in eyes of the note-taker)
2. perform a risk analysis and if the assessed actual risk is relatively low (such as e.g., a requirement to coply with a potential DMCA notice), go ahead and see what happens.

But it also leads to a bunch of interesting questions. Twitter, Facebook or Mastodon are full of quoting, reposting, boosting, linking to 3rd party images and videos, etc. All that, effectively constitutes copyright infringement. **_How do we feel about all that?_** Are there any useful reading sources on this?

> "it is comparatively easy to make computers exhibit adult level performance on intelligence tests or playing checkers, and difficult or impossible to give them the skills of a one-year-old when it comes to perception and mobility"
> -- [Moravec's paradox](en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec')

# On wants and asks in human interactions and relationships

Healthy relationships in the end boild down to transactions like this: _Tell me what you want, I will tel you what I want and we either meet in the middle, or realise it won't work this time and can move on._ No need to argue in vain.

Now, I can well understand why sometimes people are unable, uneasy, or unwilling to communicate clearly what they want. Yet, I still find it stunning how often people do not even know what is it what they want, yet get angry if they don't get it.

A lot of pain and hurt could be saved if we dedicated more time to introspection and listening to our own emotions.

# Infinitely zooming picture

arkadia.xyz/

This is fun. Infinitely zooming generative scene. It's not the first one I encountered, but one of the most captivating. Worth storing a bookmark to brighten somebody's day...

RT @jtannady
Re: impostor syndrome. Someone once said to me

"You think that you don't belong here and that everyone is smarter than you. But do you really believe that you are clever enough to trick all these smart people into thinking that you deserve to be here if you don't?"

> A set of brackets is a barrier to understanding between the reader and the writer.
> -- [slate.com/human-interest/2021/]

The quote in itself is a standalone reminder of presence of friction in writing. Any writing.

The linked story is also interesting, but this quote just jumped out of the text as I was reading it. Probably (am I just being apologetic?) because I tend to (BS! I do it all the time and with passion (whatever that means)) overuse(!) parentheses (and other fancy characters on my keyboard) and such (but I do not do it on purpose - well, it just feels right (sometimes, obviously)).

# European Space Agency (ESA) seeks new astronauts - applications open 31 March 2021

> For the first time in 11 years, ESA is looking for new astronauts. These recruits will work alongside ESA’s existing astronauts as Europe enters a new era of space exploration.

esa.int/Newsroom/Press_Release

Hey fediverse folk! Is there somewhere a map of federation/defederation of fediverse? I mean which instances see/listen to which other instances (since the relationship is asymmetrical). Does not have to be graphical, but ideally searchable (text files?).

Point is, I suspect my home instance might be blocked by some other instances I am interested in and I have no way to know whether people out there will even see my toots if I speak to them first.

Any explanations and pointers appreciated. Thanks.

# Mercator map projection distortion animated

Anybody who deals with maps and geospatial data knows that different projections distort the world map in different ways. Still it's instructive to see it in an good visualisation.

Animated maps of Mercator projection distortion of country areas in two maps by Neil Kaye.

Static version:
mobile.twitter.com/neilrkaye/s

Animated version:
mobile.twitter.com/neilrkaye/s

Mercator projection was designed to preserve angles of straight lines on a map. As a side-effect, it inflates sizes of objects farther away from the equator on the map: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercat

# SKATEBOARD SLIDE GUITAR! | Justin Johnson

youtube.com/watch?v=jUoI8omxf7

So yesterday we had a shovel guitar (qoto.org/@FailForward/10567534). Let's have an awesome skateboard guitar today! He plays it like a dobro. Fun!
![](i.ytimg.com/vi/jUoI8omxf7Q/mqd)

# On awkwardness of boosting one's own toots vs. the scrapbox idea

Mastodon has this funny aspect that public timeline of an account is a completely separate beast from the Home timeline. Apart from all the foreign toots, the home timeline includes also all the responses by self to other conversations.

This led me to an idea to treat the public timeline as an archive of stuff I want to keep "for posterity" - the scrapbox idea. It is turning out to be a limiting feature.

Specifically, it leads to confused use of the toot boost facility. Originally, the boost of a toot is meant to make it visible to one's followers. In turn, the public timeline turns into a set of toots one wants to "broadcast". Complementary, "favourite" facility is useful as a signal of :thumbsup: emoji: "I read you!". It's more of an acknowledgement, rather than saving into a box of "favourited" toots. Simple "like".

So far, so good. The problem starts with my idea of "misusing" the publicly visible timeline as a curated sequence of notes to keep. It makes it impossible to "boost" a toot to one's followers with an intention to instigate a conversation. Additionally, if I want to keep some of my own comments which I make during an interesting conversation, I have to boost it. That is a somewhat socially awkward thing to do. It's like screaming: "Hey, look what smart thing I just said!". Now, that is silly...

## Lesson learned
Clearly, Mastodon (and in fact any Fediverse tech, such as Friendica) is best used as a discussion tool: "broadcast stuff you want to be read and discussed". My one month attempt to turn it into a tool for central storage of public notes of mine is turning negative.

While I still want my notes to be discussed, it's clear it cannot be the primary purpose of my Mastodon account - if I want to use it for communication with people too. Proper use of Mastodon would turn my notes (kept in my account's public timeline) into a mess.

A better idea is to keep notes outside of Mastodon and semi-automatically import them from outside. That seems to be a better design.

Either way, I like this Mastodon thing for communication. But not for my original idea of notekeeping.

Those who know how to win are much more numerous than those who know how to make proper use of their victories.

– Polybius

#Quote #QuoteKW #Polybius

@hellquist You mean like "what is the percentage of individuals, such that there exists at least one other individual which thinks the first one is an idiot"?

I think it's a good estimate that apart from children, everybody qualifies. Given that the about 25% of world population is under the age of 14 years*, I think the answer is at least 75% of world population are idiots. 😜

* Data source: ourworldindata.org/age-structu

How many idiots are there, as in a percentage?
I'm thinking one persons definition of an idiot is another ones hero, so shouldn't deviate too much? So...how many?

# Getting out of the drama of the rescuer

> the key skill for caring people is to listen to others without solving their problems for them.
> -- [Lewis Psychology channel/Youtube](youtube.com/watch?v=jSdODaTeHX)

Show thread

> From the examples we can see that regardless of the initial roles adopted each individual can move from one position on the triangle to another in a fraction of a second and individuals move around the drama triangle for the same reasons they play games they want to get their needs met but they're too scared to ask for what they want directly so they play games and manipulate others into giving them what they want.
> -- [Lewis Psychology channel/Youtube](youtube.com/watch?v=jSdODaTeHX)

Ha, so here we go: scared to ask for what you want and therefore manipulate to get it anyway. Smart. Self-defeating...

Show thread
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.