Show newer

Another reason (among many) why I became disenchanted with and had to “invent” .

Warren Sturgis McCulloch, the co-inventor of the first computational model of a that was the precursor for and , uses a racial slur to incorrectly suggest that Cybernetics is somehow the result of the “interbreeding” between the Natural and the Artificial in the preface he wrote for Gordon Pask’s book:

goodreads.com/en/book/show/396

“The paradox Kant had linked to teleology (or to internal purposive forms or natural purposes) is related to the fact that a purposive system has to move or develop towards a purpose before that purpose is present, apparently even before a purpose can be conceived of. A genuine purposive system does not only possess a representation of the purpose towards which it is moving, but it also has to construct that representation itself.”

Gertrudis Vijver - New Perspectives on Cybernetics - Self-Organization, Autonomy and Connectionism

link.springer.com/book/10.1007

and

<According to the Santiago theory, the behavior of a living organism is determined. However, rather than being determined by outside forces, it is determined by the organism’s own structure – a structure formed by a succession of autonomous
structural changes. Thus, the behavior of the living organism is both “determined” and “free.”>

Fritjof Capra - The Organization of the Living: Maturana’s Key Insights

constructivist.info/18/1/005.c

"The relation of the is often popularly expressed by referring to as the "" of life, but here again we must emphasize that there is no intrinsic chemical property of DNA that allows it to hold this office. It is the integrated collection of "ordinary" molecules we call the cell that endows DNA with this authority. We should not expect that a more detailed study of DNA, enzymes, and hormones would reveal other than ordinary molecules anymore than we would expect that a detailed study of presidents would reveal other than ordinary men."

ᛕᎥᕼᗷᗴᖇᑎᗴ丅Ꭵᑕᔕ  
#HHPattee “#HierarchyTheory: The challenge of complex systems” - Published back in 1973, but many people still struggle to understand it. It affec...


": The challenge of complex systems" - Published back in 1973, but many people still struggle to understand it.

It affects everything, from the to , , ...
This matter is so fundamental that it should be taught in schools as part of a standard high school curriculum, along with physics, chemistry, and biology.

academia.edu/863851/Hierarchy_

The real problem is , not .

"People are often irrational and behave in ways that contradict their values, and values can change over individual lifetimes and generations. After all, it’s not clear whose values we should have machines try to learn."

quantamagazine.org/what-does-i

IS .

The used by a computing to anticipate the of affairs in its depends heavily upon the state of the anticipatory system.

Knowledge is the result of the system's of all previous computations. The same system will anticipate different outcomes depending on its current knowledge state

An anticipatory system does not need to be a system.

and Anticipation are only necessary for .

There is no anticipation in .

Apart from that, a very interesting article:

academia.edu/5729941/Anticipat

Back in the days (early 2000s) I tried to "sell" to a well-known aerospace company this "three-legged stool" approach of stable continuous organizational , where stands just as one of the many different tools one can choose from in dealing with the different of the organization, along with tools and methods more appropriate to deal with the other two aspects of the organization and .
As one could have expected, those "black belts" on the other side of the table didn't like it 😀.
They went with a strategy where a version of six sigma was used as the "foundation" for all process improvement efforts and everything else was subordinated to it.

Show thread

"Silicon Valley’s culture of “move fast and break things” meant business leaders were less concerned with reliability and more focused on game-changing discoveries."

Why it always has to be "Either-Or"? What happened with "And"?


getpocket.com/explore/item/wha

I've drawn the picture below as a reaction to the current inclination of prominent the(r)orists frowning at "military" style or organizational methods while promoting without and with no need for (everything will change anyway), as a far better, more way of dealing with .

This may be true if the organization is operating and struggling to survive on the left side of this "complexity plane", but if it wants to mature and "get somewhere in life" it better starts aiming for the other side by collecting, documenting and using "lessons learned", planning for and working towards wherever it wants to be in the future.

A momentous recent paper from the most consequential thinker on the matter of the , , and has only 124 views and I must be responsible for at least a dozen.

"Folding is entirely a lawful physical process, leaving neither freedom nor necessity for interpretation. Similarly, the initial converse action-to-symbol conversion of sensory inputs also leaves no freedom for interpretation until after the action-to-symbol conversion"

academia.edu/66621846/Symbol_G

" goes one step further than standard analysis; its aim is to infer not only beliefs or probabilities under conditions but also the of beliefs under changing conditions, for example, changes induced by treatments or external interventions."

"There is nothing in the joint distribution of symptoms and diseases to tell us that curing the former would or would not cure the latter."

J. Pearl - Causal inference in statistics

Statistics Surveys Vol. 3 (2009)
p. 99

ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/r

Show thread

" does not imply causation, but implies a specific pattern of correlations, and that must count for something."

"Testing a is actually not so much about trying to confirm it, but about trying to falsify it."

the100.ci/2022/11/18/causal-in

It's interesting that Ashby never uses the phrase "control system" in the book. For him, it seems, the is also the (potential) .

Show thread

Complexity is in the eye of the beholder (observer)

Ashby: "In this book I use the words “very large” to imply that some definite en, with definite resources and techniques, and that the system (is in) some practical way, too large for him; so that he cannot observe completely, or control it completely, or carry out the calculations for prediction completely. In other words, he says the system (is) “very large” if in some way it beats *him* by its richness and ."

p.62

Show thread

" might, in fact, be defined as the study of systems that are open to but closed to and
control—systems that are “information-tight”."

W. Ross Ashby (1956): An Introduction to Cybernetics, (Chapman & Hall, London): now available electronically.

pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.htm

My latest post - Cybernetics and the Stoics #cybernetics #Stoicism

The impediment to action advances action. What stands in the way becomes the way

harishsnotebook.wordpress.com/

@freemo @alex

In many senses, I find sets high standards for communication in . You have enabled connected services, allowed 65K characters, you have robust policy, we can use markdown in posts, and you are also very welcoming, responsive, and open community!

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.