@bodomenke It requires 3/4 of the *states* to ratify, after Congress passes it. So, yes, it's a very high bar and it's not gonna happen any time soon.
@BruceMirken He is the only person in the world who is uniquely positioned to clearly demonstrate what a bad ruling this was. And he's choosing to do nothing.
@BruceMirken A speech full of empty vibes and no action?
#President #Biden: "The Supreme Court just set a dangerous precedent that gives the President unchecked power, and I'm too weak to do absolutely anything about it, as everyone expected. It's your problem, now. Good luck, jackasses."
@exsangus Yeah, but in theory he could just have them detained under house arrest instead, for a far less bloody exercise of the abuses they've enabled.
There is a presumption of immunity if the President orders the assassination of his political rivals.
There is absolute immunity if the President does this using his core commander-in-chief powers.
If I were a political opponent, I would not travel overseas where the President's powers are at their zenith.
Welcome to authoritarianism.
#uspol #politics #uspolitics #law #lawfedi #legal #SCOTUS #Supremecourt
@feld (A) The president has the entire DOJ at his disposal. That's like DoSing Google. The attorney's fees alone would be astronomical.
(B) The previous precedent was that a *sitting* president couldn't be charged, so that wouldn't be a problem anyway. They had to wait until after the term was up to level criminal charges, compared to political charges (impeachment), which can be leveled during the term.
From the future wikpedia article: "Weak, old, and confused, Biden and his hidebound neoliberal advisors seemingly could do nothing to stem the rising tide of fascism, claiming the 'checks and balances' of government prevented him from taking any substantial action. The Biden administration looked on, seemingly helplessly, as the evil rose and metastatized." #supremecourt #biden #Trump #history
@jkosseff Nailed it.
Pretty good decision from the Supreme Court in Netchoice today. (The case where Texas and Florida wanted to ban content moderation) ...
Would usually celebrate that as a nice victory. But between the other recent Supreme Court rulings and the Democratic party's absolutely dogged determination to lose the next election, Netchoice feels like winning $10 on a lottery scratch ticket while watching your house burn down.
I did it. Never have before in my life, and I felt a degree of trepidation doing so, but at least through the end of today, that symbol seems appropriate, so an upside-down American flag will fly in front of my house.
Dire distress, indeed.
@tehuti88 What you see as "disloyalty" is actually loyalty.
If someone is failing the party, then the loyal thing to do is urge them to step down and allow someone who can better serve to take their place.
Loyalty to the party is more important than loyalty to any individual, even a president. Just as loyalty to country is more important than loyalty to party, and loyalty to humanity is more important than loyalty to country.
@inquisitormundi I think like 90% of it can be traced back to measuring our economies based on "average" wealth instead of "median" wealth.
Software engineering contractor/consultant in Florida specializing in .NET C# #WebDev, plus #Indie #GameDev in #MonoGame, #Stride, and #Godot.
I like complex simulations and enjoy writing procedural generation algorithms for fun.
#Pilot in training. Burgeoning fan of #Aviation in general.
Fan of #1A jurisprudence and the kind of #FreeSpeech that applies to everyone equally.
Pro-Democracy. Pro-Rights. Pro-Freedom. In that order.
Politically moderate, but a registered Democrat since January 7th 2021.
He/Him 🏳🌈
High risk of rants, especially with the lack of character limit.