Show newer
Shamar boosted

"Google drops Blogspot India domain breaking hundreds of thousands of links"

What a mess!

Lessons:

1. Move away from Blogspot. It's not getting any love

2. Own your domain name even if you post on someone else's platform (so you can switch if necessary)

Shamar boosted

Quantum Hardening Cryptographic Protocols: invidio.us/watch?v=Bjal5aE33iY

And before anyone asks: yes, quantum computers exist. It's an open question whether we can build one powerful to be a threat, but regardless it's better to be safe & design crypto they can't break.

Shamar boosted

GitHub - rochus-keller/OberonSystem: Modified version of the original from projectoberon.com/ for use with the Oberon IDE github.com/rochus-keller/Obero

Shamar boosted

nospec.com this is from a designer/artist perspective, but the literal same thing applies to hackathons, and you should refuse to have anything to do with them if possible.

Show thread
Shamar boosted

‘It’s just a pigeon,’ said the girl. ‘Let it die.’

The boy lifted it with gentle hands. It was too weak to struggle. He could feel its heartbeat against his fingertips. ‘It just needs help, that’s all.’

He nursed it day and night. Warmed it by a lamp, cleaned its wounds. Fed it from his hand. Every day it grew stronger. And larger.

After a week, it was the size of a cat. A month, a dog. It gazed at him with adoring eyes. And one day, it would carry him into the sky.

#microfiction #TootFic

@hyphen

I use hashtags to find back threads and posts later.

@xj9

Shamar boosted

Practical Procedural Generation For Everybody: invidio.us/watch?v=WumyfLEa6bU

(Haven't actually watched, I'm distracted with other links. But sounds interesting!)

@hyphen

Just like every .

Open the file, modify it, save.
Before arguing, think about vs .

The fact that so many software developers pretend this can't happen, shows how broken is current .

@xj9

@xj9

You are ignoring time into your reasoning.

If you code for a small élite (which is totally fine, even if such élite has a cardinality of one), the probability that what you build is going to attract economical and political interest is actually low.

In such case, public domain is as good as copyleft, since you only care about the few people you are coding for and, if a venture capital turn your tool into an oppressive proprietary spyware for everybody else, your small élite can still use the public domain software you coded.

BUT, if you are hoping to free more than a couple of persons, if you aim for a wider reach, releasing code in the public domain is exactly working for free for those you want to beat.

You are taking the risks.
You are doing the hard part of Research and Development.

And what's worse, you are building a new well defined market for them to enter.

If you build something that, even for a small period of time, have a chance to succeed, by releasing as public domain you are just doing your enemies a favour.

Now, as a workaround, is NOT perfect. In particular, licenses have too many loop holes.

BUT, if you don't protect your work so that its evolutions will stay in the , you are renouncing to any hope for your principles to spread.

A is defined by the rules that protect what the members held in from their own individual egoisms.

So if you look at things into an historical perspective, you should see that putting work into the public domain is always to support oppressors in the long run.

While I'm happy to look something more effective than GNU licenses, a a strong Copyleft can slow down a bit the Embrace, Extend and Extinguish strategy that is the immune system of .

@walruslifestyle@octodon.social

Shamar boosted

@xj9 @walruslifestyle@octodon.social

Did I say that existing isn't perfect?

But imagine if it was public domain!

@xj9 @walruslifestyle@octodon.social

That's what they want you to think.

But afaik didn't do a clean room implementation of , for example.

Also suggesting to not share ideas means suggesting to not do anything innovative or subversive, since once you distribute something innovative you ARE sharing ideas.

isn't perfect but makes it harder to run EEE tactics.

But throwing subversive code to the public domain is just a way to do R&D for big corps for free.

@walruslifestyle@octodon.social

That would be the joy of American corporations.

No authorship, no copyleft.

The shortest path to see your subversive project embraced, extended and extinguished.

Shamar boosted
Shamar boosted

Do others feel that the *vast* majority of the exciting open source work these days happens outside the U.S.? (In a larger proportion than you'd expect based on where commercial software is written, I mean).

At first, I thought it was just that #rust had a non-US tilt due to Mozilla's involvement.

But the more I look around, the more it seems like (almost) all the exciting Foss projects are in Europe – with the notable exception of sr.ht/ and a few others.

Agree? Disagree?

Shamar boosted

@ljwrites

While this is the smartest objection to my usual comparison of free software and free speech, I think you are missing an important detail.

is a work-aroud to defeat unjust laws.

If I take code (or executables, it doesn't change much), modify it and publicily share the result under any form, I'm going to be criminalised and actually indicted for copyright infridgement.

Now for a , programming is a form of expression just like writing is for everybody else.

International copyright laws and agreements is basically statal censorship for economical (thus ideological and political) gain.

Now, one might argue that are a tiny minority that do not deserve such right to expression and it have to sacrify it for the other mainstream programmers.

And it's surely true that the people did their best to take Free Software from hackers to turn it into an exploitative, ethically washed, tool.

And I agree that, because of that, we are reaching the limits of what a licence, however strong, can protect.

For example, thanks to the progress of , we can all see that all free software copyleft forgot the right (duty?) to .

But free software still stands as a tool to create a protected zone of free programming expression in a hostil environment ruled by (corporate friendly) copyright law.

Since copyright infrigement can lead hackers to statal jail, free software IS free speech.

Shamar boosted
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.