Show newer

2021-03-04, 08:40, Thursday

I write a lot these days. Finally found a story I like enough to work on it for multiple days. There is also a piece of software I'll need to work on... Actually, I might tell a story.

So I am writing this program, it's basically a very advanced thermodunamic calculator. My work is to create a qt gui around someone else's core library. And my advisor asked me to give some work to a younger student (currently 2nd year) on the project. Following best practices, I asked him to do some tests. Haven't gotten anything out of the guy for the past few months. Another student, 1st year, joined the project later; actually, she installed the program a week ago. Yesterday she sent me some tests and filed around five bug reports on github. So much responsibility.

@mathias @FailForward

Thanks for the list! I use some of these, although for knowledgebase and notes I find obsidian quite good. Not cli, but it runs smoothly and available on windows. And alacritty as a terminal is surprisingly good, tbh.

As for package manager - stock apt from my ubuntu-based pop-os is just good enough :p

@FailForward @mathias
I use mastodon on my phone
to reply most of the time and on PC I type new stuff every morning, there really aren't any hotkeys I could use. But yeah, good to know.

@mathias @FailForward
This thread is pure gold for looking into cli software :D
Do you people use cli most of the time our of principle or is it a habit? I found myself using a lot of vim and terminal-based tools for personal stuff, but uni and other places still require word documents and stuff :(

@FailForward
Yeah, I do this too, works most of the time. My goal now is to sleep as much as my body needs, not as much as I want to. Because I want to do stuff, but my body needs to play dead for 8 hours or so :p

2021-03-03, 08:10, Wednesday
I decided to stop using alarm clock altogether, at least when there is no early class or it's online. Yes, sleep hygiene will suffer since I'm unable to wake up at a consistent time, but overall anxiety goes down this way. I remember living with an alarm clock very well: waking up at 5 am for a few years. I now understand that I wasn't really happy at the time, partly because going to bed early significantly constraied my social activities, partly because of unavoidable sleep deprivation. A good lesson nonetheless.

@FailForward
Personally I don't block people, out of principle. The only person that ever made it in my blacklist is my ex and she put in a lot of work to achieve this.
But then again, neither do I get emotional in arguments nor do I take part in said arguments on a regular basis.

2021-03-02, 07:55, Tuesday

Yesterday @FailForward pointed out that the link to my blog is broken. Let's give it another shot: [link](academicalnerd.blogspot.com/). Anyway, it's academicalnerd.blogger.com, as always.

I started writing fiction in the mornings, 500 words every day for a week. I hope to turn it into a somewhat decent short novel. This helps to hone my craft and escape the unpleasant reality I find myself in from time to time.

@FailForward
Oh, does markdown require these?.. Didnt know. I'll patch it later. It's academicalnerd.blogspot.com, anyway.

2021-03-01, 12:15, Monday

My willpower is way too low to do anything decent today, so I organized my blogspot page. Here it is: [link](academicalnerd.blogspot.com). I'll be posting longer stuff there just in case. This will be moved to my website once I have time to actually build one.

2021-03-01, 06:53, Monday

Classes start again. I'm not font of the ones I'll have today but it's fine - there are things to do while ignoring my teachers. Like reading a textbook on the subject, for example.

There probably will be a break in my long-form posts since I want to try some fiction in Russian. Sorry to my English-speaking followers, I'm not yet comfortable enough to write something big in English; might translate it, though. Generally my idea is that I'll spend a week writing around 500 words per day and release the result in the end of the week.

Also, I'm thinking of using the "blogger" website instead of making an actual site because I have relatively few free time now. Building a decent site can be done on holidays, though.

2021-02-28, 08:50, Sunday

Getting back to work. Yesterday's podcast was sooo good, I might even go back and take some notes. But for now I'll need to take notes on crystallochemistry and a couple other subjects. Thinking of using anki for this.

@trinsec
Good point, although I tend to get this one on YouTube.

2021-02-27, 08:47, Saturday

Day off. Watching Lex Fridman's [podcast](youtu.be/ifX_JnBfxTY) with Eric Weinstein, round 4. Beautiful conversation, highly recommend.

Got my birthday gift from my uni group, about 10 months late but it's fine. Two small bags of good coffee and a bottle of amaretto. Never thought I needed one, but it seems like I did. Gonna give it a shot.

2021-02-26, 07:03, Friday

I'll have to go to uni for a few classes today. Corona here seems to be slowing down, but it's still a bit unnerving to go into subway during rush hour. And there will be a test on crystall chemistry, a very confusing subject. We'll see how it goes.

Yesterday a new class started. The professor reminded me of something. The most important thing for teacher - for anyone - to remember is that we are all humans. Most of the time we do bad and annoying things not because we are evil but because we are forgetful and collectively dumb. I wish I could remind that to this professor, but this will basically grant me a failed class and it's not like you can fail a class here in Russia.

Yesterday there was an interesting thought: we are always told that doing mistakes is fine, it is part of the learning process. And it's true, but the sole existence of the word "mistake" implies consequences, doesn't it? So I'd reframe it: mistakes are always punished and you'd better avoid the expensive ones. You'll uninevitable make some because you are human, so don't expect it to "be fine" somehow, instead be ready to pay the price.

@namark
I agree with peer-review point and digital signatures, more or less. On the "why is this a thing" I refer you to this beatiful [video](youtube.com/watch?v=PriwCi6SzL) by "medlife crisis" on scientific publishing, how it has formed and why it is still the way it is.

# On Publishing And Publishers

TLDR: a quick overview of the situation scientific publishers created and ways to partially solve the problem, or rather bypass it.

Tags:

1. Introduction

There is a problem in our world, that is not widely talked about, especially on media. These are scientific journal publishers, or rather the system that they have established a long time ago and keep using (and monetizing) to this day. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for capitalism, it's when it gets in the way of important things when I get slightly disappointed.

Let's agree on the important stuff first: the era of lonely geniuses is long time over. The science and scientific advancements in the 21st century depend on cooperation of dozens, hundreds and thousands of people throughout the centuries. Information obtained years and decades ago is used to build new knowledge upon. A student in my faculty is required to have at least 20 citations in their coursework in the end of the first year, and it's not an issue - we usually approach 30 mentioned sources and research even more while doing the literature review. This is a bare minimum to become acquainted with the material. Scientific knowledge can be represented as a tree graph, with it's roots in ancient philosophy and it's leaves reaching into quantum physics and abstract algebra. To cherish the fruit of this tree, one needs to reach it's branches or, abstaining from the methaphore, to research everything that has already been done.

The access to this knowledge in the current model is pricey: one article costs between 30 and 50 dollars and journal subscriptions are expensive even for universities. Of course we violate the law and use Sci-hub extensively. This is very wrong, fundamentally wrong: people should be able to do their work legally, especially when this work is to solve humanities' problems and improve peoples' lives on the broadest scale possible. And don't get me started on the trouble it takes to do the fact-checking on all the articles that are on the web. It would have been so much easier to just read the source. Tough luck!

So there is, as I have mentioned, Sci-hub: illegal, but convenient and free way to obtain most of the articles, otherwise paywalled. For downloading textbooks and various books libgen is very handy and very illegal. Sometimes useng orchid or researchgate is possible to contact authors and request a full-text and even ask a few questions, but this is slow and inconvenient; not everyone is on these plaforms, which makes things worse. There is no way to quickly dismantle the "rule" of publishers, the have been around since the beginning of 20th century. They claim to be important because of the peer-review but I am unsure whether the peer-reviewing is that expensive, especially in modern world.

2. Analysis

So let's list the benefits of scientific publishing. There are some, obviously, and I'm not here to deny them.
1) Peer review. The most important step to keep most of the junk out of the system. Here I refer to pseudoscience and badly written papers as "junk" to save some space.
2) Verification of scientists and institution affiliations. This makes the industry exclusive, but keeps junk out of the system, again.
3) Storing articles and providing a way to access them via identification system (doi).
4) Keeping track of citations.

Now let's get to downsides. There is plenty, as mentioned above.
1) Paywalls.
2) Very slow system.
3) No way to communicate with authors.
4) Publishers have control over the entire thing.

Now It would be fair to have a look at alternatives and what they can provide. I'm writing this without references so please correct me if something is off.

Sci-hub: free way to bypass paywalls. Solves problem 1, creates legal problem.
Researchgate and orchid: a way to communicate with authors. Solves problem 3 partially.
oaDOI and similar sites: they keep track of open-access articles, this partially and legally solves prolem 1.

That's it for the most part. It's not like publishers are going anywhere, as well as doi system. Not in the near future. Maybe we'll come up with something better than sci-hub, maybe torrent-like system for rticles, who knows. Verification of articles can theoretically be done using blockchain technology. I have no idea what's next or how to solve the problem, but I am putting Alexandra Elbakyan in my "acknowledgements" list.

Dixi.

2021-02-25, 08:20, Thursday

This morning I remembered where I was almost a year ago, in March of last year. Miserable wreck, brewing coffee with shaking hands and second guessing my decisions. Malleable, manipulated with ease and unconfident to a disgusting extent. It's been a while and I learned a lot, most importantly to document my own code and neglect others' opinions. There is a long way to go, but I now have a person to walk alongside and a couple tricks up my sleeve to make a ride more cozy.

@rick3
Go for it! If this is your first time starting bujo or any thorough planning at all, keep two things in mind:
1) planning is a skill with rather unpleasant learning curve, like programming, so take your time;
2) keep your planner near you and reference it as often as possible, it is an easy mistake to open your notebook in the morning and in the evening, but it's not what you should be doing;
Anyways, good luck with this.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.