🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@qoto.org

@Ponygirl @ryan

If you believe there is abpossibility, however small, god may he real then you are agnostic. If you believe god doesn't exist you are atheist.

That said definitions matter very little to me. Definitions aside i only would need to know, is there a possibility god exists or not, however low?

@Ponygirl @ryan

If you believe there is abpossibility, however small, god may he real then you are agnostic. If you believe god doesn't exist you are atheist.

That said definitions matter very little to me. Definitions aside i only would need to know, is there a possibility god exists or not, however low?

Just submitted my first W3C proposed standard to W3C for consideration. I am not allowed to say what it is per W3C rules, but wow its super exciting!

@Ponygirl

A more appropriate term would be faith based, than religion based. Atheists are a faith based position.

100% of atheists claim there is no god, if you are not making that claim you are not atheist by definition, that would make you agnostic (making no assertion about a god either way).

@ryan

@KimPerales

To be fair if he thinks the voter fraud is carried out entirely by the democrats (which is nonsense but just what if) then it would make perfect sense that him winning would stop him from talking about it. Why would he need to address it if their attempt wasnt successful?

We have been very overloaded because despite receiving a few million in funding, which includes QOTO it also includes quite a few other things. We have spent most of the year highering and ramping up and frankly it took a lot longer to ramp up than I expected.

As of right now we have one guy looking into a few fixes so we may have a few more things fixed soon. If you want let me know and ill give you the link to the matrix room where you can talk to the developers and system admin.

I also hired 2 new developers with a cross over to system admin, so once we get them signed up we should have a bit more bandwidth to tackle what few issues we have left.

@Strandjunker

Agreed, I feel the exact same way about anyone who voted for Trump.

I also dont judge you for your choice of party if you voted for Harris, I do however judge you for supporting genocide, and supporting attacks on trans rights

Sadly that leaves me disappointed in 98% of Americans this election.

@BrianJopek Very true... and if Harris had won the same statement would have been true about her. Thats the problem. This election was about if we wanted to starve and promote genocide, or have democracy be dismantled. Both choices were a loss.

@Soretski

And again, when you look at the chart from 1900s onward the number is not even at all unusual, it follows exactly the trend of the numbers since the 1900s just fine, almost exactly what you'd expect given the trend. See attached.

@truthbait

@Soretski

I see your not too bright. I never said it was or wasnt fraud. Unless your claiming it wasnt unusually high now? You were literally trying to claim it was unusually high and thats your reasoning (or at least part of it) as to why it is fraud, and now your acting like a toddler because I agreed that it was unusually high, lol. Takes a special sorta stupid, I cant even make this shit up.

@truthbait

@Soretski @truthbait

For reference here is the chart blown out to 1900.

As is very evident now while 2020 certainly had the largest turnout, it fits very nicely with the trend since 1900s of incrreasing turnout year after year.

Remember first thing you do is look at the zoomed out chart, 4 data points is not enough to discern a pattern.

@AlphaKiloPapa

Sorry should have been more clear, I meant the assertion this thread is based on about one-time voters which was not meant literally apparently but to mean "there was a higher than normal turnout" which was true but very different than what was originally said.

@Soretski @truthbait

@Soretski

I didnt demand anything. Now that you explained you didnt actually mean what you were saying and instead just meant "he had an unusually high turnout" I simply agreed with you. The only person insisting on arguing nonsense beyond that is you. I accepted the explanation with no objection.

@truthbait

@AlphaKiloPapa

I take it this is like your other statement. You dont actually know the statistical probability and are just saying it to basically mean "man that seems unusual"?

Given the riots at the time, philly was literally on fire, something i never witnessed in my life, it makes perfect sense to me that we saw a record turnout **on both sides**. What i find strange is that despite there being record turnouts on both sides it is only suggestive of fraud on Biden's side.

@Soretski @truthbait

@Soretski

Fair enough, if you didnt mean what you said literally and were just trying to say that biden got an unusually high popular vote that is higher than what democrats typically have gotten, then sure. I will be happy to grant you that.

That said it isnt particularly compelling on its own as an argument for election fraud, especially since he only ran once, so we have no idea. I mean if that is the argument used one could say the same aboutn Trump, that he got an unusually high popular vote as well compared to past elections.

@truthbait

I hate it, thanks.

@black6 Lets hope this meme goes chiral :)