Show newer

small web 

@slothrop @kerr1ck @scanlime

There are service websites like this (e.g. you can't buy railway tickets in Poland between IIRC 1am and 2am), and _those_ are just annoying.

On the other hand, there are websites that run on unreliable power sources and are sometimes simply unavailable. Those _are_ charming: see for example solar.lowtechmagazine.com/abou

@delroth Aah. I didn't associate them that way for some reason; probably because there's too many of them.

@timorl @chjara @cell

In a world without popular support for the concept of IP (with everything else being left equal) people would be incentivized to rely on secrecy. This situation sounds like one that would be more common in a world where secrecy is used more often. (Obviously, there are possible worlds without IP where that problem doesn't exist and maybe even it's hard to get a world with IP where it doesn't exist, but I'm think of quite literal ceteris paribus.)

@delroth I wonder if I see something and don't realize the implications or if I don't see it. What is the thing that looks similar to cel shading here?

How popular is en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynefi?

I've learned about it a few days ago and I realized that the boundaries it describes are very often by people without explicit references to it, and the correlations it implies (e.g. that need for reasoning from first principles is strongly correlated with problems that are not precisely specified). Now I wonder if everyone learnt about it and uses it (and I just didn't get the memo) or if there's a different source for these ideas.

The reason I noticed that is that I find some of the consequences of that view of the world weird and/or suboptimal for good modeling of the world. In particular, I like well-specified problems where you need to reason from first principles. Also, I see a tendency in the environments that deal with things that Cynefin marks as "complicated" to _not_ make it easy to reason from first principles (by not caring about making the relevant first principles easy to specify).

(-adjacent, because cryptography is the area that seems to straddle complicated and complex) (well, if not that then what is the branch of philosophy that does the same to motivation that epistemology does to knowledge?)

@peterdrake The fellow who was TAing my group in abstract algebra (slawomir-cynk.u.matinf.uj.edu.) always gave the impression of just randomly following digressions, but we always ended up traversing through the relevant and important topics. To this day I don't know how much planning he did.

@matthew_d_green WDYM by a "server"? A machine, a VM, a process, or anything that is "physically" present on some concrete machine (as opposed to the request being handled by ~whoever is able to do so in the vicinity?), or something else?

@LunaFoxgirlVT@vt.social It would be nice if there was a way to subscribe to a blocklist (so that its changes actually affect you ~immediately). @ariadne

@delroth Something like UUIDs of "same" users in the new and old install differed?

@zyk@mastodon.nz What about "someone on your instance viewed a thread that should contain/contains the toot"?

@cafkafk Also, wave at CCTV cameras, in case some bored security guard is forced to watch the video stream.

@freemo Where do you keep the code and do you keep the configuration in a public place too? (I want to try figuring out what sends those duplicated Access-Control-Allow-Origin headers that mess up remote following sometimes) @obi

@obi Was any of your mastodon tabs backlogged (i.e. had lots of posts that weren't displayed yet and was presenting a "NNN new items" entry at the very top)? @freemo

@obi Typing should be affected only by thing happening on your machine. This might very well include your (web?) client being busy, but the server being busy should not cause that effect (other than maybe when you're typing a mention). @freemo

@grzgrz Czy wiesz czy istnieje wersja tekstowa?

@grzgrz Najśmieszniejszy który widziałem (disclaimer: dotyczył instancji na której jestem) to "blokujemy, bo oni nie blokują X".

@didek
> to czemu by nie

W świecie w którym ~wszyscy tak robią, blokowanie wcześniej nieznanych instancji byłoby bardziej popularnym podejściem.

@grzgrz

@AubreyDeLosDestinos Ale to nieprawda. Co _najmniej_ istnieje wymaganie respektowania życzenia zaprzestania prób komunikacji z kimś (i też pewna wersja "do not spread hate", ale to jest bardzo ocenne, więc nie mogę wiele twierdzić na temat tego, jak bardzo znaczenie będzie się pokrywać z tym, jak ktoś inny by to rozumiał). @grzgrz

@lcamtuf Note that instances that have people that follow you will generally fetch media too. "Remote" media is treated as a cache, and various instances have various approaches to how long they cache it for etc. I would hope that they drop it when they receive a deletion event for the associated post, but (a) it's hope (b) that notice might never arrive if something broke their mutual federation in the meantime (e.g. one blocked the other; iirc in either direction).

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.