Show newer

What is it with conservatives and this "there are only two sexes" nonsense... Are they trying to convince us they arent any smarter than a grade schooler or something. Anyone who has had more than an elementary school education knows full well its not that simple...

Ether has surged past $2,000 to a new all-time high as the native cryptocurrency of the Ethereum blockchain continues a year-long bull run.

by @wsfoxley trib.al/AlZ2PT2 twitter.com/CoinDesk/status/13 #Crypto #Blockchain #Cryptocurrency #Ethereum

--
Sponsored-By NEW News Site:
ChestertonEagle.com

Next time your feeling down just remember there are people stupid enough out there to sincerely beleive germ theory is a hoax, the earth is flat, and that human-caused global warming is a conspiracy...

People literally beleive the whole of science is some giant cabal of scientists in on the conspiracy just so they can get paid... never mind the fact that research scientists are some of the lowest paid scientists compared to those who work for companies implementing and doing...

@alxd Nice! I've played some of them, but definitely some to check out. Some others worth checking out are Mouse Guard, the Cortex Prime system (and earlier Cortex Plus, e.g. Firefly, Marvel), and
Polaris: Chivalric Tragedy at the Utmost North.

Controlling Smart Lights Using Dumb Switches with Shelly and Home Assistant - Presently sponsored by: 1Password is a secure password manager and digital wallet that keeps you saf... feedproxy.google.com/~r/TroyHu #iot

@woke8yearold bitcoin is not energy inefficient; bitcoin would run fine on a dozen pentiums spread around the world because the difficulty adapts to available processing power; economics drives processing power based on fees users are willing to pay. Changing the algorithm won't change the economics, although proof of stake does allow the cost to come from the least-valuable-alternative rather than electricity specifically.

@sgryphon Indeed I had the time to try it, and it works very well, I can now access that ipv6 server from my ipv4 network. Thanks!

@bob @bjoern @codesections

Democracy is NEVER about empowering tiny numbers of "elites" from any prospective.

We need structers without centralisation. Don't grasp POWER, spread POWER

#indymediaback #4opens #OMN

RT Ryan Sean Adams - rsa.eth 🏴
Federal Reserve of St. Louis drops a paper on DeFi

"DeFi may potentially contribute to a more robust and transparent financial infrastructure."

They even nail the diagram of the DeFi stack.

Q: Someone at the Fed reading @BanklessHQ?

A: Yes.

👇 research.stlouisfed.org/public
twitter.com/RyanSAdams/status/ #Crypto #Blockchain #FED #FederalReserve #StLouis

--
Powered-By Community News Site:
ChestertonEagle.com

Started running D&D Curse of Strahd recently. One of the players used popular culture for inspiration and then created a custom miniature to match.

Have an only site or homeserver that you want to make available to ipv4 clients - try a free CDN service like who will proxy it for you.

@aluaces I just tested Cloudflare free plan on one of my websites. The site only has an AAAA address, but Cloudflare proxies both A and AAAA for you.

@aluaces also, check your mobile provider, as some support IPv6 but may not enable it. e.g. Telstra, in Australia, has had IPv6 for a long time, but only recently been configuring for dual stack (and now some are single stack IPv6).

@aluaces to make an IPv6 site available to IPv4 you need someone with an IPv4 address to provide a proxy. e.g. my hosting provider, Mythic Beasts, provides that for all customers.

Some content delivery networks (CDNs) also provide IPv4 proxy services. Some CDNs have free tiers, try Cloudflare.

Otherwise you need to pay for a very cheap dual stack server (all it needs do is proxy).

If you don't want general availability, you could also try an IPv6 tunnel broker, that will run an tunnel (over IPv4) to your device, e.g. laptop, allowing it to access IPv6 only resources. Try Hurricane Electric.

Again note that if you are self hosting on IPv4 then you would also be using NAT to the private range. The difference is not NAT (both use it), but whether you have an IPv4 address to use with the NAT.

@matrix well Elon Musk recently tweeted to not use Discord, so maybe something similar is happening to Signal. Has there been an upsurge in usage?

@aluaces IPv4 usually require NAT anyway.

At least with an IPv6 server there is only one NAT, compared to hosting provider NAT to 10.x range, then virtual machine NAT to 192.168 range, then container NAT to 172.16 range.

An IPv4 private 172.16 k8s pod is as unreachable by an IPv4 client as IPv6. Any solution with IPv4 (even without IPv6) needs NAT.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.