Eubie Drew (QOTO 🦣) @EubieDrew@qoto.org
- Inactive 🐦
- http://twitter.com/EubieDrew
- Activist 🐘
- https://spore.social/@EubieDrew
Interested in #PlanetaryScience, #Exoplanets, #Astrochemistry, #Astrophysics, and #ClimateScience.
Sometimes send curated cross-posted content from my Twitter acct, #𓅪𐃘𓃰
Joined Nov 2022
They really seem to think you are on their side.
@EubieDrew@spore.social @Kahu@bigisland.social @mokana@bigisland.social
I guess it will take a while for the new avatar to circulate thru the fediverse.
@Kahu@bigisland.social @mokana@bigisland.social
Actually you CAN put WP in a subdirectory (no subdomain involved). They have that option so you get it out of the way a static website on the TLD.
@mokana@bigisland.social
Sounds like each Masto and the WP are on separate servers. I had the, perhaps naive, idea of communication of some sort between my Masto and my single-user WP.
WP can be installed on a subdirectory/file. Masto apparently can not.
I am low-key focusing on inmotion VPS.
I have not set physical location. Ease of tinkering, code dev.
@robryk Unlisted intentionally to stay in my tech bubble somewhat.
### Serious questions about webhosting
Please boost.
I am looking for webhosting to play with a bunch of installations for exploring software development & coding ideas, not public interaction *at this time*.
Will.install Mastodon and Wordpress, plus likely Pleroma, Friendica, Matrix, Discourse & Git.
Very small data volume & storage, but multiple domains, websites & email addresses.
Could you help me with choosing dedicated/cloud/vpn and selecting a webhost. I would prefer dedicated if I can afford it.
I am familiar with Cpanel & PHP., and I have run WikiMedia & Wordpress sites, 10 years ago.
OR, if you are interested in similar ideas, we could make a hosting relationship.
My awkward attempt to refer to when you subscribe to an account and send it to one of your lists rather than Home.
And many of such folks are addicted to the rush. It takes over their life. This is why It doesn't take very many individuals to create chaos.
Eubie Drew (QOTO 🦣)
boosted
@EubieDrew @1dalm When I was a bit younger, I thought the recent past had been filled with drama (WWII, Cold War, social change) but it was all becoming less “exciting“ now. Wrong!
It's amazing what widely available technology that bypasses the #prefrontalcortex can accomplish. We are allowing our collective ids to resonate and create an irrational behavior convergence.
(I hope there is more to what I just wrote than a bunch of $5 words.)
❝How is doing a #QOTO-style account #subscribe to a #list different from putting an account on a list with the show replies set to "no one".❞
That wasn't very clear. Let me restate:
How is doing a QOTO-style subscribe of an account to a list different from putting an account on a list with the show replies set to "no one"?
@freemo To be a little more specific:
Do accounts know they are on your lists?
How are they different from #twitter lists?
Can lists be shared?
How is doing a #QOTO-style account #subscribe to a #list different from putting an account on a list with the show replies set to "no one".
I have been happily employing #lists via #QOTO's robust subscribe capabilities, and just now started to explore the conventional list features.
Basically, I leapfrogged the technology.
So now I am curious about the pro & cons of the two methods (QOTO or standard) of using lists to observe individual #fediverse account.
It seems like they are parallel/redundant in most ways with respect to me as the information consumer, but how do these two methods differ from the POV of the observed accounts and 3rd parties looking at my lists?
I really want to settle on either adding people to lists the standard way, or through subscription (current method).
#
Eubie Drew (QOTO 🦣)
boosted
In my ideal world every server would say "here's how we decide who to federate with" and it would range from "every server that isn't doing protocol-level attacks on us" to "every server on which I haven't personally observed behavior I think my users would prefer not to see, such as [examples]" to "every server not listed on [url]", and then people could decide which kind they want to be on.
There could be one or more fediblock-like tags that people could use to communicate about who to block, without it having to be an absolute condemnation that everyone agrees on.
(I'm on #qoto partly because it's in that first category, not blocking much at all at the server level, and I do like to see trash before burning it, but I'm totally okay that many people would rather not! It's okay to delegate large parts of your Mastodon filtering to a trusted admin if you want; nothing at all wrong with that.)
The problem seems to be that lots of people, including some admins, think that servers have to be divided into universally praised and universally condemned sets, and of course any universally praised server would never federate with a universally condemned one. Some people just want the universe to be simple! But it seldom is.
(And so qoto sometimes gets blocked just because it doesn't block some other server, which seems I think silly to me, although I can put together an argument to the contrary if I try.)
fwiw...
- Inactive 🐦
- http://twitter.com/EubieDrew
- Activist 🐘
- https://spore.social/@EubieDrew
Interested in #PlanetaryScience, #Exoplanets, #Astrochemistry, #Astrophysics, and #ClimateScience.
Sometimes send curated cross-posted content from my Twitter acct, #𓅪𐃘𓃰
Joined Nov 2022
Eubie Drew (QOTO 🦣)'s choices:
