Source:
Maturana H. R. & Guiloff G. D. (1980) The quest for the intelligence of intelligence. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 3(2): 135–148. https://cepa.info/555
A compelling approach to #Intelligence back from the 80's that does not rely upon #ProblemSolving or #GoalOrientedBehavior as do most of the contemporary doctrines of #AI and #AGI.
In #Kihbernetics we distinguish between three control functions (levels):
1️⃣ #Regulation the purpose of which is maintaining the system's #homeostasis,
2️⃣ #Control for finding an optimal path (and way of utilizing the regulators) to fulfill a given #goal, and
3️⃣ #Guidance (governance) providing direction.
Korzybski's famous remark that "the #map is not the #territory" because people regularly confuse conceptual models of #reality with reality itself, and its derivatives such as "all models are wrong" originates from regarding the #model as a #blueprint or picture ***describing*** that reality.
The #model is instead a #recipe (instruction) or a #tool for helping us navigate the terrain, what Maturana would call a #GenerativeMechanism with which each one of us is able to create our own image of reality depending on what we "want" from the terrain we are navigating through.
#Problem Dissolution, #RAckoff
"A #PhilosophicalSolution of a problem proceeds by showing that the troublesome questions rest on #MistakenAssumptions."
#BRundle (2004) - "Why there is Something rather than Nothing"
>As business struggles to adapt to a rapidly changing world, managers are bombarded with a bewildering array of schemes for how to be a boss and make an organization tick. It’s tempting to be seduced by *futurist fantasies where every company has the culture of a startup, and where employees in wacky, whimsical office settings, liberated from hierarchies* and bosses that oppress them, are the foundation for breakthrough performance.
>
>***“Get real,”*** warn Nicolai J. Foss and Peter G. Klein. These fads ironically lead to micromanaging and, often, to disaster. Companies and societies, they show, need authority and hierarchy to coordinate work, including creative work. And, *counterintuitively, Foss and Klein illustrate how the creative use of authority and hierarchy helps companies to be more agile and flexible*, enabling educated, motivated people and teams to thrive.
https://www.google.ca/books/edition/Why_Managers_Matter/e6ddEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0
"The Turing test is not a good test for testing the supposed "intelligence" of an artificial system. This is well known in the Artificial Intelligence scientific community (I analyze this issue in my book “Cognitive Design for Artificial Minds”, Routledge, 2021). Trivially, one of the problems of the test concerns the fact that it is entirely "behavioral": that is, it looks only at the final behavior (the output) of a system without analyzing what are the mechanisms that led to that output."
Translated with: "Simple Translate" Extension for Firefox:
https://simple-translate.sienori.com/
#Life is a necessary condition and comes before #Intelligence which is in turn necessary for the acquisition of #Language:
>Language use is an aspect of human collective behaviour, and it only makes sense in the wider context of the human social activity of which it forms a part (*Wittgenstein, 1953*). A human infant is born into a community of language users with which it shares a world, and it acquires language by interacting with this community and with the world it shares with them.
Trying to "reverse engineer" intelligence from LLMs seems like a futile endeavor. Instead of #AI, it may be more useful to redirect efforts to building #ArtificialLife (#AL)
When we say that
>we are asking the model to remind us of the lyrics of a well-known nursery rhyme, ... what we are really doing is asking it the following question:
>>Given the statistical distribution of words in the public corpus, what words are most likely to follow the sequence “Twinkle twinkle ”?
To which an accurate answer is “little star” 😀
Not just any kind of body. #Intelligence needs a #living body able to (re)#produce and maintain itself. That's why I believe we won't have #AGI until we figure out "#ArtficialLife" first.
For me it is the opposite. I see the ask for #understanding as pleading for #support from the bottom. "Do you understand me?" can be translated into "Do you support what I'm saying?"
The term #comprehension, on the other hand, "sounds" more like #control. "Do you comprehend?" may be apprehended as "Do you have a good enough #grasp over all of this" so I can be sure you won't "screw up" something?😀
@bbak @kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus
Wasn't trying to start an argument. I just don't see anything questionable in using these terms for identifying different organizational cultures.
The term "culture" is used mainly to describe a set of values, beliefs, and behaviors shared among members of an organization, and those are often based on particular (known) frameworks, methodologies, or approaches like Scrum, Kanban, CMMI, ISO ...
Anyways, I think we've beaten this issue to death so I'll join you in wishing all the best in the New Year to all you good people. Have fun🎉
@bbak @kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus
If we can have names like "Gothic architecture" and "Christian religion" why is using "Kanban culture" as distinct from "Scrum culture" being controversial?
And yes, #memory is very important for #learning, state dependent (dynamical) systems.
@bbak @kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus
Where did you get the idea that I equate policies and culture?
Stories songs, and other documents are never just a description of the culture that created them. As you correctly identified, when they are accepted by the masses as a #Standard, they can be a powerful means for culture specific motivation and control (constraint).
In the end, it really does not matter if your organization is a #Kanban, a #Scrum, or some other #Culture. Every (people) organization is a #DynamicalSystem with #Memory.
@bbak @kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus
Of course. A document that describes it is the #product of the #culture. It is a form (means) of #preservation and #communication of cultural traits. A kind of #memory.
Instead of a written document, you may have a bard singing songs about the culture that would be fulfilling the same role.
@kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus
#Behavior is what an #external #Observer will see as the interaction of the organization with its #environment while I see #Culture as more of an #internal thing.
Culture for sure affects the #production of the organization's behavior but, at the same time, it is quite possible that two different organizations with completely different internal cultures may exhibit the same or similar external behavior.
@kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus
Of course they can, have to, and will change. What I'm saying is that there is no need for a "special" organizational #overhaul change process. It should all be part of a daily #maintenance routine.
It is common knowledge though, that #Innovation works best when there are #Constraints in the process and that's hard to change something that is not properly documented. Changes done on someone's whim or "hunch" are the worst.
I see #Culture as nothing more than the organized collection of all the standard (written and unwritten) procedures an organization uses daily. That's the "living document" they pull out when they want to explain how they "do business here". It helps when there is at least an illustration or some other "hard" document that can be shared.
@kironbondale@mastodon.world @joeposaurus
Years ago, while working with a SW development organization, I was arguing that their #Agile SW development process is already structured as a #Dynamical #Learning #Organization. They just have to make sure they keep track, analyze, document, and possibly standardize procedures discussed in their daily #Scrum meetings because that's where their organizational #Knowledge (#Culture) is created and maintained.
Didn't "get it" even after being provided with hints. It seems to know a little bit more about VSM though.
In any case, I don't think you can expect any definitive answers or arguments from a "bullshitter" designed to please you by providing what it "thinks" you may want to hear 😀. At best, you can get an overview of the most common (mis)understandings of the matter you are inquiring about.
According to #WRAshby, #Regulation is blocking the flow of #Variety from the (environmental) #Disturbance to the (internal, #System protected) #EssentialVariable. There are two primary forms of blocking the effect of the disturbance on the system:
1️⃣ Passive (by sheltering from), and
2️⃣ Active (on par with)
From:
W. Ross Ashby (1956) - An Introduction to Cybernetics, (Chapman & Hall, London) - available electronically from:
http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASHBBOOK.html
#Kihbernetics is the study of #Complex #Dynamical #Systems with #Memory which is very different from all other #SystemsThinking approaches. Kihbernetic theory and principles are derived primarily from these three sources:
1️⃣ #CE_Shannon's theory of #Information and his description of a #Transducer,
2️⃣ #WR_Ashby's #Cybernetics and his concept of #Transformation, and
3️⃣ #HR_Maturana's theory of #Autopoiesis and the resulting #Constructivism
Although applicable to any dynamical system with memory (mechanisms, organisms, or organizations) we developed our Kihbernetic worldview mostly to help people navigate their #organization through times of #change.
We define* an organization as:
"An integrated composite of people, products, and processes that provide a capability to satisfy a stated need or objective."
*Definition of the word "system" in MIL_STD_499B
#People are at the forefront of our thinking (the #who and #why are we doing this for and/or with?).
We then focus our efforts on understanding all the functions or #Processes in your organization (#how and #when something happens or has to happen?).
Finally, we get to analyze the #Products and/or services that you put on the market but are mostly interested in the tools that you use or may need to buy or develop in order to fully integrate your production system (the plan for #what and #where things will happen?).
Our goal is to make the people of your organization self-reliant to the point that they shouldn't need our assistance with the continuous maintenance and adaptation of the system.
In any case, we've got your back while you do the heavy lifting of establishing a better future for your organization!